Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.forbes.com/sites/alicegwalton/2014/10/23/the-science-of-the-common-core-experts-weigh-in-on-its-developmental-appropriateness/
Nice summary of problems with Common Core. Quotes from experts.
Major "problems" with the Common Core standards:
1. Children aged 4-7 should be playing. However, they weren't playing before the Common Core standards, and if the Common Core standards went away tomorrow, they still wouldn't be playing.
2. Testing. However, the requirement for testing comes from the No Child Left Behind Act, which predates the Common Core standards. If the Common Core standards went away tomorrow, there would still be a testing requirement.
3. Children aren't standardized. However, there were standards before the Common Core standards. The No Child Left Behind Act requires standards. If the Common Core standards went away tomorrow, there would still be a requirement for standards.
Anonymous wrote:How is it giving kids opportunities when you spend more time on sight words than you do on phonics, leaving them with limited vocabulary and literacy?
What is the source of this statement. I taught first grade and I challenge this statement.
What does "basically expired" mean, legally?
Anonymous wrote:Then you should work on changing the No Child Left Behind Act.
NCLB has basically expired. Duncan is giving waivers for AYP. He might as well just waive the tests and make everybody happy. I have contacted my senators and representatives.
Then you should work on changing the No Child Left Behind Act.
2. Testing. However, the requirement for testing comes from the No Child Left Behind Act, which predates the Common Core standards. If the Common Core standards went away tomorrow, there would still be a testing requirement.
Anonymous wrote:http://www.forbes.com/sites/alicegwalton/2014/10/2...developmental-appropriateness/
Nice summary of problems with Common Core. Quotes from experts.
Thanks. This is the best article I have read so far. The tests need to go right away. The standards can be made usable.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/alicegwalton/2014/10/2...developmental-appropriateness/
Nice summary of problems with Common Core. Quotes from experts.
Anonymous wrote:http://www.forbes.com/sites/alicegwalton/2014/10/23/the-science-of-the-common-core-experts-weigh-in-on-its-developmental-appropriateness/
Nice summary of problems with Common Core. Quotes from experts.
Anonymous wrote:One set of standards is actually cheaper, more cost-effective and provides far greater ROI than the way it had been done prior with a thousand flowers blooming.
But a thousand flowers blooming is a beautiful field of color.
The diversity of experience and thought due to expansion of experiences through differing standards and curricula was positive. If tests are the same and textbooks are all made by the same 2 or 3 companies, well, BORING. It's like having McDonald's and Subway all over.
How is it giving kids opportunities when you spend more time on sight words than you do on phonics, leaving them with limited vocabulary and literacy?