The abject speculation and unintelligent commentary here (like people trying to talk about Luminol but spelling it wrong) is mind-numbing.

I just want to know the WHY.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A former FBI investigator said something about the ransom notes sent by email and very hard to track. He thinks this was a fairly sophisticated job and could even be an overseas server. I really doubt it’s the sister and brother-in-law having an accident and cooking all this up in a couple of hours.

Which is why it is so weird to me that they are looking for evidence inside Annie’s house. I really hope she’s not involved.

Perhaps the idea is she was never dropped off at home. She died during or after the dinner at Annie’s home. Her blood was planted on the porch to make it appear like a kidnapping

The Apple Watch data contradicts this theory.

96% of this thread is fantasy and projection. People don’t like to let facts or the absence thereof getting in the way of their bone deep knowledge about what happened in any given situation.

I agree there is a lot of specification, but often it is based on known facts of the case that have been released.

I hope she’s still alive

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:THE SPECULATION IN THIS THREAD IS SICKENING.

Some of you are absolute scum.

I have to agree and I think Jeff should consider setting this down. This is a cesspool of speculation and baseless accusations.

They aren’t baseless. The man’s car was impounded and police spend hours last night photographing garage in the dark. These are facts.

It is very possible that their house is being examined because that’s the last place she went. It would make sense to see if any clues were left behind or evidence of someone stalking her that night. Taking his car could be a required formality since she was in it a few hours earlier. Or they could be checking it for a tracking/bugging device.

They don’t light up with luminal the garage of an every family member of a kidnapped person. For over an hour. In the dark.

Was luminal used? I didn’t read that in the media accounts.

Luminal not confirmed. But they took photos in the dark for 3 hours. If they were just taking normal photos they would turn the lights on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A former FBI investigator said something about the ransom notes sent by email and very hard to track. He thinks this was a fairly sophisticated job and could even be an overseas server. I really doubt it’s the sister and brother-in-law having an accident and cooking all this up in a couple of hours.

Which is why it is so weird to me that they are looking for evidence inside Annie’s house. I really hope she’s not involved.

Perhaps the idea is she was never dropped off at home. She died during or after the dinner at Annie’s home. Her blood was planted on the porch to make it appear like a kidnapping

The Apple Watch data contradicts this theory.

96% of this thread is fantasy and projection. People don’t like to let facts or the absence thereof getting in the way of their bone deep knowledge about what happened in any given situation.

There is a terrible feeling of doom as Monday approaches.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A former FBI investigator said something about the ransom notes sent by email and very hard to track. He thinks this was a fairly sophisticated job and could even be an overseas server. I really doubt it’s the sister and brother-in-law having an accident and cooking all this up in a couple of hours.

Which is why it is so weird to me that they are looking for evidence inside Annie’s house. I really hope she’s not involved.

Perhaps the idea is she was never dropped off at home. She died during or after the dinner at Annie’s home. Her blood was planted on the porch to make it appear like a kidnapping

The Apple Watch data contradicts this theory.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A former FBI investigator said something about the ransom notes sent by email and very hard to track. He thinks this was a fairly sophisticated job and could even be an overseas server. I really doubt it’s the sister and brother-in-law having an accident and cooking all this up in a couple of hours.

Which is why it is so weird to me that they are looking for evidence inside Annie’s house. I really hope she’s not involved.

Perhaps the idea is she was never dropped off at home. She died during or after the dinner at Annie’s home. Her blood was planted on the porch to make it appear like a kidnapping

Anonymous wrote:I actually hope (but don’t believe) this is some elaborate hoax about how white women get more media attention than women of color, or how AI distorts news coverage and you don’t know what to believe or something along those lines.

That wouldn't require harming an elderly woman. You could just make something up to do either of those things.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think looking at the sister and her husband's house means it IS them. As in-town caregivers, it's likely they share service providers and have people coming in and out of both houses. Just as likely they are looking to collect evidence related to stuff like that.

Yep, going through all the people who come in and out of both of these homes (since she was probably over at the SIL and BIL's home a lot) is probably a priority. Remember Elizabeth Smart was taken by someone who had been in their house doing work. The main suspect in Relisha Rudd's case was a janitor.

I have never forgotten the Laura Houghteling case in Bethesda where the killer was a crazy guy the mom paid to do yardwork.

https://washingtonian.com/2024/08/29/what-happened-to-laura-houghteling/

It can go the other way too. Remember the Brookland case where the man hired to do yard work was killed by the homeowner's mentally ill brother who lived in the basement?
https://wapo.st/3O4yint

I am not taking a position on who I believe the suspect is. I don't think we have enough information from LE, there surely is a lot they haven't said, or misdirected.

That said, I haven't bought the money motive for the SIL. If it was him, however, I would imagine something like this: he drove NG home. They had a conversation in that car that alarmed him--something she knew or confronted him about? This was not plotted and planned, and likely there will be more evidence that comes out that was left behind.

Back door left open to try for the "wandered off" theory. But the media and investigation team didn't run with that. Speculation about abduction led someone (who was involved with the disappearance - or a third party) to go with the ransom angle which is why it came 48 hours later.

The media reporting and videos have contained snippets designed to put pressure on someone. To signal we are getting close, and see how they respond. "This was a sophisticated person." A lengthy first video, humanizing their mom. Followed by the shorter video yesterday. "We understand you." Even if it's not directed at the ransom-writer, they are trying to bring the suspect in.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:THE SPECULATION IN THIS THREAD IS SICKENING.

Some of you are absolute scum.

I have to agree and I think Jeff should consider setting this down. This is a cesspool of speculation and baseless accusations.

They aren’t baseless. The man’s car was impounded and police spend hours last night photographing garage in the dark. These are facts.

It is very possible that their house is being examined because that’s the last place she went. It would make sense to see if any clues were left behind or evidence of someone stalking her that night. Taking his car could be a required formality since she was in it a few hours earlier. Or they could be checking it for a tracking/bugging device.

They don’t light up with luminal the garage of an every family member of a kidnapped person. For over an hour. In the dark.

Was luminal used? I didn’t read that in the media accounts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:THE SPECULATION IN THIS THREAD IS SICKENING.

Some of you are absolute scum.

I have to agree and I think Jeff should consider setting this down. This is a cesspool of speculation and baseless accusations.

They aren’t baseless. The man’s car was impounded and police spend hours last night photographing garage in the dark. These are facts.

It is very possible that their house is being examined because that’s the last place she went. It would make sense to see if any clues were left behind or evidence of someone stalking her that night. Taking his car could be a required formality since she was in it a few hours earlier. Or they could be checking it for a tracking/bugging device.

Why didn’t they do that data ago, though? You’d think that would be one of their first steps.

I actually hope (but don’t believe) this is some elaborate hoax about how white women get more media attention than women of color, or how AI distorts news coverage and you don’t know what to believe or something along those lines.