Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any guesses when closing arguments will be?
Friday
Opening arguments maybe. I would
not expect closing before next week.
Opening arguments were in April. Do you mean jury deliberations? I would guess verdict on Monday or Tuesday
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any guesses when closing arguments will be?
Friday
Opening arguments maybe. I would
not expect closing before next week.
Opening arguments were in April. Do you mean jury deliberations? I would guess verdict on Monday or Tuesday
Anonymous wrote:2 mistrial requests in one week reeks of desperation from the defense. They still have no defense. You can't say karen broke her tail light in a driveway then have the defenses one witness saying the tail light had to be broken at 35-40 mph. They literally contradict themselves. She's so guilty it hurts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any guesses when closing arguments will be?
Friday
Opening arguments maybe. I would
not expect closing before next week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any guesses when closing arguments will be?
Friday
Opening arguments maybe. I would
not expect closing before next week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any guesses when closing arguments will be?
Friday
Anonymous wrote:Any guesses when closing arguments will be?
Anonymous wrote:The defense all but shut down the commonwealth’s case today. Several highly qualified experts concluded that the victim simply wasn’t hit by a car, and the prosecution’s cross just reinforced the strength and credibility of the defense’s experts. The victim’s injuries and the damage to the car are a complete mismatch with the commonwealth’s theory. The prosecution embarrassed itself. This trial feels much different than the first. The defense hasn’t focused on all the shady things other people did (other than law enforcement), and they hit a home run establishing the victim was not hit by a car. The prosecutor also became so annoying and rude towards the end it had to be off-putting to the jury.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:His arm had no broken bones. None. No fractures. No hairline fractures. That is just not possible
That's not what the experts testified to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The defenses 24 mph experiment proved karen hit him.
Haven't been following the 2nd trial. 24 mph seems to be really fast while driving in reverse. I'm skeptical how anyone could calculate with any precision how fast you would need to be traveling to break a tail light.
Repeat the experiment multiple times at different speeds. Record the results. Perform statistical analysis.
Cool. Sounds like I could do that in my backyard.