High inflation, food shortages. empty store shelves, broken supply chains, $5+ gasoline, looming recession, ominous nuclear conflict, odious intrusive government, rising interest rates, out of control crime, mass illegal immigration, biased media, corrupt politicos, and rigged elections.
WELCOME TO THE THIRD WORLD – THANK YOU JOE BIDEN & FELLOW DEMOCRATS

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would love to witness the chaos that rationing would create, wouldn’t you?

I kind of hope Biden does this, because it would be hilarious to see how many Democratic members of Congress would lose their jobs over it come November.

It would be exactly the type of shoot themselves in the foot action we've come to expect from the Biden administration.

I think people forget (or don't about) how much chaos was created by gas rationing in the seventies and it's "moral equivalence to war."

We obviously survived the gas rationing of the 70’s just fine, didn’t we? There’s no reason it wouldn’t work again.

As president, Jimmy Carter did not survive it.

Rationing makes people think of failed and semi-failed states, like Venezuela. I doubt that’s something Biden and the Dems want to be associated with right before the mid-terms.

If people understand that the purpose of rationing is to punish the oil companies and gas station operators who are gouging prices right now, they’ll be all for it. But the optics of it have to be communicated effectively. People need to understand the point of the rationing is to stabilize prices and limit profiteering by big oil. When they see oil companies as the enemy, they will applaud the administration for going after them.

You’re either delusional or engaged in parody of an economically clueless liberal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would love to witness the chaos that rationing would create, wouldn’t you?

I kind of hope Biden does this, because it would be hilarious to see how many Democratic members of Congress would lose their jobs over it come November.

It would be exactly the type of shoot themselves in the foot action we've come to expect from the Biden administration.

I think people forget (or don't about) how much chaos was created by gas rationing in the seventies and it's "moral equivalence to war."

We obviously survived the gas rationing of the 70’s just fine, didn’t we? There’s no reason it wouldn’t work again.

As president, Jimmy Carter did not survive it.

Rationing makes people think of failed and semi-failed states, like Venezuela. I doubt that’s something Biden and the Dems want to be associated with right before the mid-terms.

If people understand that the purpose of rationing is to punish the oil companies and gas station operators who are gouging prices right now, they’ll be all for it. But the optics of it have to be communicated effectively. People need to understand the point of the rationing is to stabilize prices and limit profiteering by big oil. When they see oil companies as the enemy, they will applaud the administration for going after them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would love to witness the chaos that rationing would create, wouldn’t you?

I kind of hope Biden does this, because it would be hilarious to see how many Democratic members of Congress would lose their jobs over it come November.

It would be exactly the type of shoot themselves in the foot action we've come to expect from the Biden administration.

I think people forget (or don't about) how much chaos was created by gas rationing in the seventies and it's "moral equivalence to war."

We obviously survived the gas rationing of the 70’s just fine, didn’t we? There’s no reason it wouldn’t work again.

As president, Jimmy Carter did not survive it.

Reagan was elected by massive voter fraud. Let’s not even suggest he wasn’t. There is no possible way any candidate challenging an incumbent wins a 49 state election. That’s just not even in the realm of reality.

Do you have any cites that assert fraud? I have never heard this and voted Carter.

Carter, by the way, carried six states and Washington DC.

Any election with a “R” on the ballot is all the citation for fraud one needs. I wasn’t there obviously. But you’re old, and surely you must’ve suspected something at the time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would love to witness the chaos that rationing would create, wouldn’t you?

I kind of hope Biden does this, because it would be hilarious to see how many Democratic members of Congress would lose their jobs over it come November.

It would be exactly the type of shoot themselves in the foot action we've come to expect from the Biden administration.

I think people forget (or don't about) how much chaos was created by gas rationing in the seventies and it's "moral equivalence to war."

We obviously survived the gas rationing of the 70’s just fine, didn’t we? There’s no reason it wouldn’t work again.

As president, Jimmy Carter did not survive it.

Rationing makes people think of failed and semi-failed states, like Venezuela. I doubt that’s something Biden and the Dems want to be associated with right before the mid-terms.

If people understand that the purpose of rationing is to punish the oil companies and gas station operators who are gouging prices right now, they’ll be all for it. But the optics of it have to be communicated effectively. People need to understand the point of the rationing is to stabilize prices and limit profiteering by big oil. When they see oil companies as the enemy, they will applaud the administration for going after them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would love to witness the chaos that rationing would create, wouldn’t you?

I kind of hope Biden does this, because it would be hilarious to see how many Democratic members of Congress would lose their jobs over it come November.

It would be exactly the type of shoot themselves in the foot action we've come to expect from the Biden administration.

I think people forget (or don't about) how much chaos was created by gas rationing in the seventies and it's "moral equivalence to war."

We obviously survived the gas rationing of the 70’s just fine, didn’t we? There’s no reason it wouldn’t work again.

As president, Jimmy Carter did not survive it.

Reagan was elected by massive voter fraud. Let’s not even suggest he wasn’t. There is no possible way any candidate challenging an incumbent wins a 49 state election. That’s just not even in the realm of reality.

Do you have any cites that assert fraud? I have never heard this and voted Carter.

Carter, by the way, carried six states and Washington DC.

Any election with a “R” on the ballot is all the citation for fraud one needs. I wasn’t there obviously. But you’re old, and surely you must’ve suspected something at the time.

Lol! I am old. But I think you are underestimating the extent to which people blamed Carter for high inflation and havoc at the gas pump.

Boomers were as a group more unsophisticated and not as educated as subsequent generations. That’s why they were duped into supporting Reagan

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would love to witness the chaos that rationing would create, wouldn’t you?

I kind of hope Biden does this, because it would be hilarious to see how many Democratic members of Congress would lose their jobs over it come November.

It would be exactly the type of shoot themselves in the foot action we've come to expect from the Biden administration.

I think people forget (or don't about) how much chaos was created by gas rationing in the seventies and it's "moral equivalence to war."

We obviously survived the gas rationing of the 70’s just fine, didn’t we? There’s no reason it wouldn’t work again.

As president, Jimmy Carter did not survive it.

Reagan was elected by massive voter fraud. Let’s not even suggest he wasn’t. There is no possible way any candidate challenging an incumbent wins a 49 state election. That’s just not even in the realm of reality.

Do you have any cites that assert fraud? I have never heard this and voted Carter.

Carter, by the way, carried six states and Washington DC.

Any election with a “R” on the ballot is all the citation for fraud one needs. I wasn’t there obviously. But you’re old, and surely you must’ve suspected something at the time.

Lol! I am old. But I think you are underestimating the extent to which people blamed Carter for high inflation and havoc at the gas pump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would love to witness the chaos that rationing would create, wouldn’t you?

I kind of hope Biden does this, because it would be hilarious to see how many Democratic members of Congress would lose their jobs over it come November.

It would be exactly the type of shoot themselves in the foot action we've come to expect from the Biden administration.

I think people forget (or don't about) how much chaos was created by gas rationing in the seventies and it's "moral equivalence to war."

We obviously survived the gas rationing of the 70’s just fine, didn’t we? There’s no reason it wouldn’t work again.

As president, Jimmy Carter did not survive it.

Reagan was elected by massive voter fraud. Let’s not even suggest he wasn’t. There is no possible way any candidate challenging an incumbent wins a 49 state election. That’s just not even in the realm of reality.

Do you have any cites that assert fraud? I have never heard this and voted Carter.

Carter, by the way, carried six states and Washington DC.

Any election with a “R” on the ballot is all the citation for fraud one needs. I wasn’t there obviously. But you’re old, and surely you must’ve suspected something at the time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would love to witness the chaos that rationing would create, wouldn’t you?

I kind of hope Biden does this, because it would be hilarious to see how many Democratic members of Congress would lose their jobs over it come November.

It would be exactly the type of shoot themselves in the foot action we've come to expect from the Biden administration.

I think people forget (or don't about) how much chaos was created by gas rationing in the seventies and it's "moral equivalence to war."

We obviously survived the gas rationing of the 70’s just fine, didn’t we? There’s no reason it wouldn’t work again.

As president, Jimmy Carter did not survive it.

Reagan was elected by massive voter fraud. Let’s not even suggest he wasn’t. There is no possible way any candidate challenging an incumbent wins a 49 state election. That’s just not even in the realm of reality.

Do you have any cites that assert fraud? I have never heard this and voted Carter.

Carter, by the way, carried six states and Washington DC.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would love to witness the chaos that rationing would create, wouldn’t you?

I kind of hope Biden does this, because it would be hilarious to see how many Democratic members of Congress would lose their jobs over it come November.

It would be exactly the type of shoot themselves in the foot action we've come to expect from the Biden administration.

I think people forget (or don't about) how much chaos was created by gas rationing in the seventies and it's "moral equivalence to war."

We obviously survived the gas rationing of the 70’s just fine, didn’t we? There’s no reason it wouldn’t work again.

As president, Jimmy Carter did not survive it.

Reagan was elected by massive voter fraud. Let’s not even suggest he wasn’t. There is no possible way any candidate challenging an incumbent wins a 49 state election. That’s just not even in the realm of reality.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would love to witness the chaos that rationing would create, wouldn’t you?

I kind of hope Biden does this, because it would be hilarious to see how many Democratic members of Congress would lose their jobs over it come November.

It would be exactly the type of shoot themselves in the foot action we've come to expect from the Biden administration.

I think people forget (or don't about) how much chaos was created by gas rationing in the seventies and it's "moral equivalence to war."

We obviously survived the gas rationing of the 70’s just fine, didn’t we? There’s no reason it wouldn’t work again.

As president, Jimmy Carter did not survive it.

Rationing makes people think of failed and semi-failed states, like Venezuela. I doubt that’s something Biden and the Dems want to be associated with right before the mid-terms.

If people understand that the purpose of rationing is to punish the oil companies and gas station operators who are gouging prices right now, they’ll be all for it. But the optics of it have to be communicated effectively. People need to understand the point of the rationing is to stabilize prices and limit profiteering by big oil. When they see oil companies as the enemy, they will applaud the administration for going after them.

This is the kind of failed thinking that leads to lost elections.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would love to witness the chaos that rationing would create, wouldn’t you?

I kind of hope Biden does this, because it would be hilarious to see how many Democratic members of Congress would lose their jobs over it come November.

It would be exactly the type of shoot themselves in the foot action we've come to expect from the Biden administration.

I think people forget (or don't about) how much chaos was created by gas rationing in the seventies and it's "moral equivalence to war."

We obviously survived the gas rationing of the 70’s just fine, didn’t we? There’s no reason it wouldn’t work again.

As president, Jimmy Carter did not survive it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would love to witness the chaos that rationing would create, wouldn’t you?

I kind of hope Biden does this, because it would be hilarious to see how many Democratic members of Congress would lose their jobs over it come November.

It would be exactly the type of shoot themselves in the foot action we've come to expect from the Biden administration.

I think people forget (or don't about) how much chaos was created by gas rationing in the seventies and it's "moral equivalence to war."

We obviously survived the gas rationing of the 70’s just fine, didn’t we? There’s no reason it wouldn’t work again.

As president, Jimmy Carter did not survive it.

Rationing makes people think of failed and semi-failed states, like Venezuela. I doubt that’s something Biden and the Dems want to be associated with right before the mid-terms.

If people understand that the purpose of rationing is to punish the oil companies and gas station operators who are gouging prices right now, they’ll be all for it. But the optics of it have to be communicated effectively. People need to understand the point of the rationing is to stabilize prices and limit profiteering by big oil. When they see oil companies as the enemy, they will applaud the administration for going after them.