Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s pretty clear at this point that both sides of the story are true: Britney has serious mental health issues that are not well controlled, AND there were people who took advantage of the conservatorship for personal gain.
+1000
her inner circle now planning an intervention, completely foreseeable,
https://people.com/music/britney-spears-intervention-stalls-inner-cycle-concerned/
Finally! Not that she'll listen, I imagine.
She’s seems to be in complete denial. She needs to be back in a conservatorship. Neutral third party NOT her boytoy husband.
Brain imaging studies have shown that this crucial area of the brain can be damaged by schizophrenia and bipolar disorder as well as by diseases like dementia. When the frontal lobe isn’t operating at 100%, a person may lose—or partially lose—the ability to update his or her self-image.
Without an update, we’re stuck with our old self-image from before the illness started. Since our perceptions feel accurate, we conclude that our loved ones are lying or making a mistake. If family and friends insist they're right, the person with an illness may get frustrated or angry, or begin to avoid them.
Early studies of anosognosia indicated that approximately 30% of people with schizophrenia and 20% of people with bipolar disorder experienced "severe" lack of awareness of their diagnosis. Treating mental health conditions is much more complicated if lack of insight is one of the symptoms. People with anosognosia are placed at increased risk of homelessness or arrest. Learning to understand anosognosia and its risks can improve the odds of helping people with this difficult symptom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s pretty clear at this point that both sides of the story are true: Britney has serious mental health issues that are not well controlled, AND there were people who took advantage of the conservatorship for personal gain.
+1000
her inner circle now planning an intervention, completely foreseeable,
https://people.com/music/britney-spears-intervention-stalls-inner-cycle-concerned/
Finally! Not that she'll listen, I imagine.
She’s seems to be in complete denial. She needs to be back in a conservatorship. Neutral third party NOT her boytoy husband.
Agreed!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s pretty clear at this point that both sides of the story are true: Britney has serious mental health issues that are not well controlled, AND there were people who took advantage of the conservatorship for personal gain.
+1000
her inner circle now planning an intervention, completely foreseeable,
https://people.com/music/britney-spears-intervention-stalls-inner-cycle-concerned/
Finally! Not that she'll listen, I imagine.
She’s seems to be in complete denial. She needs to be back in a conservatorship. Neutral third party NOT her boytoy husband.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s pretty clear at this point that both sides of the story are true: Britney has serious mental health issues that are not well controlled, AND there were people who took advantage of the conservatorship for personal gain.
+1000
her inner circle now planning an intervention, completely foreseeable,
https://people.com/music/britney-spears-intervention-stalls-inner-cycle-concerned/
Finally! Not that she'll listen, I imagine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s pretty clear at this point that both sides of the story are true: Britney has serious mental health issues that are not well controlled, AND there were people who took advantage of the conservatorship for personal gain.
+1000
her inner circle now planning an intervention, completely foreseeable,
https://people.com/music/britney-spears-intervention-stalls-inner-cycle-concerned/
Anonymous wrote:It’s pretty clear at this point that both sides of the story are true: Britney has serious mental health issues that are not well controlled, AND there were people who took advantage of the conservatorship for personal gain.
Anonymous wrote:She’s now publicly shaming her kids and blaming them for not loving her enough. The kid is 15!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pearl clutching over these videos is ridiculous. I see a frustrated mom disciplining her kids. She's not the first and won't be the last mother to use strong language with her kids. In one video she is saying she the kid should show respect. In the other she takes a kid's phone away for walking barefoot in winter weather. You may not agree with her but this is hardly abuse. If anything, Fed looks like an ass for sharing these videos.
She's not a regular mom who gets frustrated dealing with her kids day in and day out. She had 1 to 2 days a week with a court ordered Monitor. She didn't raise those kids, KF did. At best, they probably view her as a part time babysitter, not someone who plays much of a parental role. She honestly doesn't have much ground to stand on on "parenting" them in a harsh way when she plays such a limited role in their lives. Given that, it looks bad she can't even hold it together during limited visitation and makes baffling parenting decisions (waking up kids to moisturize their faces? wtf). It's not a good look. Would you be cool with a babysitter speaking to your kids like that? Cursing at them and calling them weird? I would not. Team Kevin, he really stepped up as a parent in a way I didn't expect and I'm not surprised they boys don't want to spend time with their chaotic mom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is posting yourself nude considered empowering? I will never ever understand that
Me either.
Because she's reclaiming her body that others have profited from and exploited since childhood.
By displaying it to everyone else?
NP. By her own choice. She can do it.
The reality is that she is an adult abuse survivor whose body was exploited by the people who should have protected her. She is finally able to make her own choices. Do I think it is great for her to pose nude? No. But I would literally support her if she walked nude down Central Park, because it is how she is reclaiming a terrible history.