Anonymous wrote:That is the part that the judge is considering in contempt of perjury.

It's also why he's called the Covington lawyers into his courtroom.

I suspect the Covington lawyers have some 'splaining to do....

That is the part that the judge is considering in contempt of perjury.

It's also why he's called the Covington lawyers into his courtroom.

Why he pled.....

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile crickets from the left on the open FBI file on Flynn that found nothing until Strok's email on January 4th

Thank goodness you're not a LEO. None of you are LEOs.

PP, you're so smart. Can I ask the Dcum LEO expert if a counter intelligence file becomes a criminal file is right?

Anonymous wrote:

So impatient. Flynn was happy to wait 2 years for sentencing but now hr can't wait until June?

Lol

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile crickets from the left on the open FBI file on Flynn that found nothing until Strok's email on January 4th

Because that is being misconstrued, but go on believing your fantasy.

How can you misconstrue "close the case" and "no derogatory information"?

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile crickets from the left on the open FBI file on Flynn that found nothing until Strok's email on January 4th

Thank goodness you're not a LEO. None of you are LEOs.

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile crickets from the left on the open FBI file on Flynn that found nothing until Strok's email on January 4th

Because that is being misconstrued, but go on believing your fantasy.

Meanwhile crickets from the left on the open FBI file on Flynn that found nothing until Strok's email on January 4th

Anonymous wrote:This is a good thread that summarizes how Flynn lied and hypothizes as to why

I would be interested to understand from Flynn defenders where this person is wrong.

Because, her premise is wrong: she is asking WHY Flynn lied. That was the charge in the guilty plea, but Flynn is now withdrawing that plea.

And, since there is also discrepancy in the documents and evidence of severe bias on the part of the investigators (and the Special Counsel office), it is questionable that he lied.
There is also some evidence that he was coerced into the plea.

Therefore, her whole thread may be based on a falsehood.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a good thread that summarizes how Flynn lied and hypothizes as to why

I would be interested to understand from Flynn defenders where this person is wrong.

All speculation and conjecture.

Ironic post of the day. Care to back up our speculation and conjecture post with some facts?

In tweet #9, she says that Flynn lied because the "truth" would have severe political costs for the Trump administration. That makes no sense, because the prosecutors already knew "the truth", and Flynn himself said he knew that the calls were monitored.

In tweet #10, she says that Flynn lied because the "truth" could have exposed him, the transition team members, and Trump to criminal charges. Yet, she then says that "Flynn was likely unaware of exactly what statutes may have been violated".

She is basically saying that he lied as part of a conspiracy to cover up crimes by Trump and "the transition team members".

This belongs over in the conspiracy theory thread.

This is a good post debunking the Flynn defenders arguments.

https://www.emptywheel.net/2020/05/19/glenn-greenwalds-invented-claims-in-defense-of-bill-barr-and-mike-flynn/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a good thread that summarizes how Flynn lied and hypothizes as to why

I would be interested to understand from Flynn defenders where this person is wrong.

All speculation and conjecture.

Ironic post of the day. Care to back up our speculation and conjecture post with some facts?

Anonymous wrote:This is a good thread that summarizes how Flynn lied and hypothizes as to why

I would be interested to understand from Flynn defenders where this person is wrong.

All speculation and conjecture.