Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the first confirmed private meeting between a Russian national - a lawyer with ties to the Kremlin - and Trump’s inner circle during the campaign. Don Jr. specifically denied setting up meetings with Russians during the campaign.
https://apple.news/AjTvqWoUpRQiR7uaV5cfzTQ

Has Uday lawyered up yet?

I saw what you did here, OP. Uday was the son of Saddam Hussain!!!

Anonymous wrote:This is the first confirmed private meeting between a Russian national - a lawyer with ties to the Kremlin - and Trump’s inner circle during the campaign. Don Jr. specifically denied setting up meetings with Russians during the campaign.
https://apple.news/AjTvqWoUpRQiR7uaV5cfzTQ

Has Uday lawyered up yet?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love that the campaign is using donor money to pay the Trump Corporation for legal consulting. MAGA.

Do the chumps for Trump know this?

Anonymous wrote:Love that the campaign is using donor money to pay the Trump Corporation for legal consulting. MAGA.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Trump attorney Jay Sekulow complained that if the people attending the meeting were so nefarious, then the Secret Service should have vetted them.

First of all, it is not the SS job to vet who the POTUS or PEOTUS meets with in terms of political safety, just physical safety.

Second, at the time of this meeting, Trump had captured enough delegates to win the nomination, but was still a month away from the Cleveland RNC and as such, was not entitled to SS protection (was he?)

Third, if the SS should have been away of this meeting per Trump's attorney, that means Trump himself would have had to be present for it.

Was he?

Excellent, excellent point. Boy, Team Trump needs to have a strategy meeting or something, they are not coming at this defense in a unified way. Their story is changing by the hour-long cable news interview.

Sekulow doesn't know what the f*ck he's talking about. And yet that doesn't stop him. Why anyone would listen to anything this lying sack of turds has to say is beyond me.

Why *is* Sekulow even still making the rounds, after all of his "Jews for Jesus" scandal and how his family skimmed millions that were supposed to be for charity?

Why is this scam artist on TV? Because Trump views him as being an effective attack dog. He's done with Spicer and Sanders. And Conway is beyond pathetic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Trump attorney Jay Sekulow complained that if the people attending the meeting were so nefarious, then the Secret Service should have vetted them.

First of all, it is not the SS job to vet who the POTUS or PEOTUS meets with in terms of political safety, just physical safety.

Second, at the time of this meeting, Trump had captured enough delegates to win the nomination, but was still a month away from the Cleveland RNC and as such, was not entitled to SS protection (was he?)

Third, if the SS should have been away of this meeting per Trump's attorney, that means Trump himself would have had to be present for it.

Was he?

Excellent, excellent point. Boy, Team Trump needs to have a strategy meeting or something, they are not coming at this defense in a unified way. Their story is changing by the hour-long cable news interview.

Sekulow doesn't know what the f*ck he's talking about. And yet that doesn't stop him. Why anyone would listen to anything this lying sack of turds has to say is beyond me.

Why *is* Sekulow even still making the rounds, after all of his "Jews for Jesus" scandal and how his family skimmed millions that were supposed to be for charity?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Trump attorney Jay Sekulow complained that if the people attending the meeting were so nefarious, then the Secret Service should have vetted them.

First of all, it is not the SS job to vet who the POTUS or PEOTUS meets with in terms of political safety, just physical safety.

Second, at the time of this meeting, Trump had captured enough delegates to win the nomination, but was still a month away from the Cleveland RNC and as such, was not entitled to SS protection (was he?)

Third, if the SS should have been away of this meeting per Trump's attorney, that means Trump himself would have had to be present for it.

Was he?

Excellent, excellent point. Boy, Team Trump needs to have a strategy meeting or something, they are not coming at this defense in a unified way. Their story is changing by the hour-long cable news interview.

Sekulow doesn't know what the f*ck he's talking about. And yet that doesn't stop him. Why anyone would listen to anything this lying sack of turds has to say is beyond me.

Why *is* Sekulow even still making the rounds, after all of his "Jews for Jesus" scandal and how his family skimmed millions that were supposed to be for charity?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep it up libs - you are WINNING:


According to a recent Harvard-Harris poll, nearly two-thirds of Americans believe that “there exists a campaign to delegitimize” Trump.

The poll also found out that two-thirds believe the Russia investigation, which is being used to try to undermine Trump’s presidency, is “hurting the country” while a majority thought the “Deep State” was using leaks to “unseat” Trump. Other polls have found that the public actually sides with Trump against the “fake news” media that a majority of Americans believe is working with the “Deep State” to undermine Trump.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/339146-poll-voters-grow-weary-of-russia-probes

I see your poll and raise it one.

Percentage of Americans who approve of DJT: 38
Percentage of Americans who disapprove of DJT: 57

http://www.gallup.com/poll/201617/gallup-daily-trump-job-approval.aspx

38%+57%=105%

This 5% extra represent who? Deceased? Illegals?

Grade-shool dropouts?

38 + 57 = 95

Aha-ha! Definitely!
Or drunk )))

Alternative math.

Statistics

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Trump attorney Jay Sekulow complained that if the people attending the meeting were so nefarious, then the Secret Service should have vetted them.

First of all, it is not the SS job to vet who the POTUS or PEOTUS meets with in terms of political safety, just physical safety.

Second, at the time of this meeting, Trump had captured enough delegates to win the nomination, but was still a month away from the Cleveland RNC and as such, was not entitled to SS protection (was he?)

Third, if the SS should have been away of this meeting per Trump's attorney, that means Trump himself would have had to be present for it.

Was he?

Excellent, excellent point. Boy, Team Trump needs to have a strategy meeting or something, they are not coming at this defense in a unified way. Their story is changing by the hour-long cable news interview.

Sekulow doesn't know what the f*ck he's talking about. And yet that doesn't stop him. Why anyone would listen to anything this lying sack of turds has to say is beyond me.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep it up libs - you are WINNING:


According to a recent Harvard-Harris poll, nearly two-thirds of Americans believe that “there exists a campaign to delegitimize” Trump.

The poll also found out that two-thirds believe the Russia investigation, which is being used to try to undermine Trump’s presidency, is “hurting the country” while a majority thought the “Deep State” was using leaks to “unseat” Trump. Other polls have found that the public actually sides with Trump against the “fake news” media that a majority of Americans believe is working with the “Deep State” to undermine Trump.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/339146-poll-voters-grow-weary-of-russia-probes

I see your poll and raise it one.

Percentage of Americans who approve of DJT: 38
Percentage of Americans who disapprove of DJT: 57

http://www.gallup.com/poll/201617/gallup-daily-trump-job-approval.aspx

38%+57%=105%

This 5% extra represent who? Deceased? Illegals?

Grade-shool dropouts?

38 + 57 = 95

Aha-ha! Definitely!
Or drunk )))

Alternative math.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Trump attorney Jay Sekulow complained that if the people attending the meeting were so nefarious, then the Secret Service should have vetted them.

First of all, it is not the SS job to vet who the POTUS or PEOTUS meets with in terms of political safety, just physical safety.

Second, at the time of this meeting, Trump had captured enough delegates to win the nomination, but was still a month away from the Cleveland RNC and as such, was not entitled to SS protection (was he?)

Third, if the SS should have been away of this meeting per Trump's attorney, that means Trump himself would have had to be present for it.

Was he?

Excellent, excellent point. Boy, Team Trump needs to have a strategy meeting or something, they are not coming at this defense in a unified way. Their story is changing by the hour-long cable news interview.

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Trump attorney Jay Sekulow complained that if the people attending the meeting were so nefarious, then the Secret Service should have vetted them.

First of all, it is not the SS job to vet who the POTUS or PEOTUS meets with in terms of political safety, just physical safety.

Second, at the time of this meeting, Trump had captured enough delegates to win the nomination, but was still a month away from the Cleveland RNC and as such, was not entitled to SS protection (was he?)

Third, if the SS should have been away of this meeting per Trump's attorney, that means Trump himself would have had to be present for it.

Was he?