Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Before all this testing, we did have standards. Instead of concentrating on schools that were weak and trying to improve them, they decided to close the achievement gap--from the top down.
Not sure I follow- thought people were complaining that the new standards are too hard?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't like Common core, but this mess about the holocaust denial has nothing to do with it.
When a district states the paper was to meet common core standards, you have an issue. Clearly, the district didn't understand Common Core. Why is that?
I once had a kindergartener take a marker and write FUK and DAM on the bathroom walls. His behavior demonstrated mastery of the following Common Core standards:
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.L.K.1.A
Print many upper- and lowercase letters.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.L.K.2.C
Write a letter or letters for most consonant and short-vowel sounds (phonemes).
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.L.K.2.D
Spell simple words phonetically, drawing on knowledge of sound-letter relationships.
That doesn't mean that the behavior was OK or that the standards are bad. It simply means that it's a teacher's job to teach their students when and how to apply their skills.
A student who can read papers by holocaust deniers and historians, decide which one they agree with, and write an essay explaining their argument while citing specific evidence from that text, is in fact demonstrating mastery of the CCSS. So, in that sense that district is right. This assignment does meet the CCSS. That doesn't make it in any way appropriate. There are, after all, many other topics a student can write about to demonstrate mastery of the same standard, just as there are many other words and surfaces my kindergarten could have used to demonstrate his prowess at spelling and handwriting.
They were given 3 reference books - all supported the hoax theory
And your point is.....?
Anonymous wrote:Before all this testing, we did have standards. Instead of concentrating on schools that were weak and trying to improve them, they decided to close the achievement gap--from the top down.
What do you mean "what counts?". I don't understand your question. My point is the implementation of the standards (which are good IMO) is siphoning public money away from schools and enriching Pearson so it can develop crappy curriculum and yet more testing (bad). Instead of giving teachers raises and putting more resources into schools, we're sending it to a for profit company whose "products" are making kids and their parents miserable. So, I'm arguing that the anger about the whole issue is misplaced in its focus on standards, versus curriculum and testing.
Anonymous wrote:The standards themselves are great - but the curriculum, testing, and the implementation of the entire thing is a disaster.
[Report Post]
And, tell me what counts--the standards or the rest.
The standards themselves are great - but the curriculum, testing, and the implementation of the entire thing is a disaster.
[Report Post]
Anonymous wrote:And much more informative than follow-the-money-while-being-on-the-lookout-for-devilish-details
You do know that is what causes the problems? All the devilish details? Which might not be there were it not for all the money to be made?
Anonymous wrote:It is not tied to Common Core State Standards. Texas has not adopted Common Core state standards; they are using their own, Texas standards.
It IS linked to No Child Left Behind, and to funding from the federal government towards public education.
NCLB is different from Common Core state standards.
It doesn't matter if it is linked to CC or not. CC implementation has a requirement of linking tests to teacher performance--or no money.
Anonymous wrote:It is not tied to Common Core State Standards. Texas has not adopted Common Core state standards; they are using their own, Texas standards.
It IS linked to No Child Left Behind, and to funding from the federal government towards public education.
NCLB is different from Common Core state standards.
It doesn't matter if it is linked to CC or not. CC implementation has a requirement of linking tests to teacher performance--or no money.
Anonymous wrote:It is not tied to Common Core State Standards. Texas has not adopted Common Core state standards; they are using their own, Texas standards.
It IS linked to No Child Left Behind, and to funding from the federal government towards public education.
NCLB is different from Common Core state standards.
It doesn't matter if it is linked to CC or not. CC implementation has a requirement of linking tests to teacher performance--or no money.
It is not tied to Common Core State Standards. Texas has not adopted Common Core state standards; they are using their own, Texas standards.
It IS linked to No Child Left Behind, and to funding from the federal government towards public education.
NCLB is different from Common Core state standards.