Anonymous wrote:I do think if celebs want to avoid scrutiny of their relationships, it's not that hard. Look at Zendaya and Tom Holland. They got engaged without announcing it (people found out like several months later and only because she was spotted at an event in a ring that no jeweler's PR had announced was on loan to her, and then it was confirmed it was an engagement ring) and then no news about a wedding, and now it sounds like they already got married. Stuff like this is why people don't obsessively speculate about them, because they are just private and don't invite people in.

You can also do what Josh Allen and Haylee Steinfeld did and be more public (public engagement announcement, released wedding photos to press) but just be extremely straightforward and not dodgy about it -- we are getting married, yes the wedding is soon, here are pictures of our wedding. You can actually tamp down paparazzi obsessiveness if tabloids just know in advance they'll get good quality photos from the source and a press release in a timely way that avoids anyone being scooped. Take all the mystery out of it.

Or you can be extremely public about it but also keep it all a mystery to build maximum interest and speculation, and then complain that the scrutiny is unfairly intense. That is also an option.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do think if celebs want to avoid scrutiny of their relationships, it's not that hard. Look at Zendaya and Tom Holland. They got engaged without announcing it (people found out like several months later and only because she was spotted at an event in a ring that no jeweler's PR had announced was on loan to her, and then it was confirmed it was an engagement ring) and then no news about a wedding, and now it sounds like they already got married. Stuff like this is why people don't obsessively speculate about them, because they are just private and don't invite people in.

You can also do what Josh Allen and Haylee Steinfeld did and be more public (public engagement announcement, released wedding photos to press) but just be extremely straightforward and not dodgy about it -- we are getting married, yes the wedding is soon, here are pictures of our wedding. You can actually tamp down paparazzi obsessiveness if tabloids just know in advance they'll get good quality photos from the source and a press release in a timely way that avoids anyone being scooped. Take all the mystery out of it.

Or you can be extremely public about it but also keep it all a mystery to build maximum interest and speculation, and then complain that the scrutiny is unfairly intense. That is also an option.

Oh please. Nobody is near the level of stardom Taylor is - you’re seriously comparing them to Haylee and Josh? Ridiculous.

Rihanna is more popular than Taylor and she hasn’t released an album or toured in over a decade.

Oh wow. No, no she's not.

Most people globally would not be able to name one TS song. She’s successful because she knows how to manipulate her American fanbase into buying 30 different variants of her albums.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do think if celebs want to avoid scrutiny of their relationships, it's not that hard. Look at Zendaya and Tom Holland. They got engaged without announcing it (people found out like several months later and only because she was spotted at an event in a ring that no jeweler's PR had announced was on loan to her, and then it was confirmed it was an engagement ring) and then no news about a wedding, and now it sounds like they already got married. Stuff like this is why people don't obsessively speculate about them, because they are just private and don't invite people in.

You can also do what Josh Allen and Haylee Steinfeld did and be more public (public engagement announcement, released wedding photos to press) but just be extremely straightforward and not dodgy about it -- we are getting married, yes the wedding is soon, here are pictures of our wedding. You can actually tamp down paparazzi obsessiveness if tabloids just know in advance they'll get good quality photos from the source and a press release in a timely way that avoids anyone being scooped. Take all the mystery out of it.

Or you can be extremely public about it but also keep it all a mystery to build maximum interest and speculation, and then complain that the scrutiny is unfairly intense. That is also an option.

Oh please. Nobody is near the level of stardom Taylor is - you’re seriously comparing them to Haylee and Josh? Ridiculous.

Rihanna is more popular than Taylor and she hasn’t released an album or toured in over a decade.

Oh wow. No, no she's not.

Yeah, that’s ridiculous. Taylor just came off an 18 month tour that was the biggest tour any of us will ever witness. It changed local economics for gods sake.

And the fact that she is so prolific constantly putting out new makes her talked about all the time.

PP is really trying to say the person that we talk about all the time is less popular than the person no one has talked about for 10 years.

I love Rihanna and I get that she has a strong fan base but she lays low. Taylor keeps producing music and going on tour and things so of course we’re going to talk about it more and of course it’s going to be harder to hide her relationship.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ESPN reports Travis is coming back for another NFL season. This isn't good for his mental and physical health. Another year for CTE to further metastasize.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/48153217/sources-travis-kelce-expected-return-chiefs

This is silly. The risk is small.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do think if celebs want to avoid scrutiny of their relationships, it's not that hard. Look at Zendaya and Tom Holland. They got engaged without announcing it (people found out like several months later and only because she was spotted at an event in a ring that no jeweler's PR had announced was on loan to her, and then it was confirmed it was an engagement ring) and then no news about a wedding, and now it sounds like they already got married. Stuff like this is why people don't obsessively speculate about them, because they are just private and don't invite people in.

You can also do what Josh Allen and Haylee Steinfeld did and be more public (public engagement announcement, released wedding photos to press) but just be extremely straightforward and not dodgy about it -- we are getting married, yes the wedding is soon, here are pictures of our wedding. You can actually tamp down paparazzi obsessiveness if tabloids just know in advance they'll get good quality photos from the source and a press release in a timely way that avoids anyone being scooped. Take all the mystery out of it.

Or you can be extremely public about it but also keep it all a mystery to build maximum interest and speculation, and then complain that the scrutiny is unfairly intense. That is also an option.

Oh please. Nobody is near the level of stardom Taylor is - you’re seriously comparing them to Haylee and Josh? Ridiculous.

Rihanna is more popular than Taylor and she hasn’t released an album or toured in over a decade.

Oh wow. No, no she's not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do think if celebs want to avoid scrutiny of their relationships, it's not that hard. Look at Zendaya and Tom Holland. They got engaged without announcing it (people found out like several months later and only because she was spotted at an event in a ring that no jeweler's PR had announced was on loan to her, and then it was confirmed it was an engagement ring) and then no news about a wedding, and now it sounds like they already got married. Stuff like this is why people don't obsessively speculate about them, because they are just private and don't invite people in.

You can also do what Josh Allen and Haylee Steinfeld did and be more public (public engagement announcement, released wedding photos to press) but just be extremely straightforward and not dodgy about it -- we are getting married, yes the wedding is soon, here are pictures of our wedding. You can actually tamp down paparazzi obsessiveness if tabloids just know in advance they'll get good quality photos from the source and a press release in a timely way that avoids anyone being scooped. Take all the mystery out of it.

Or you can be extremely public about it but also keep it all a mystery to build maximum interest and speculation, and then complain that the scrutiny is unfairly intense. That is also an option.

Oh please. Nobody is near the level of stardom Taylor is - you’re seriously comparing them to Haylee and Josh? Ridiculous.

Rihanna is more popular than Taylor and she hasn’t released an album or toured in over a decade.

Oh wow. No, no she's not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do think if celebs want to avoid scrutiny of their relationships, it's not that hard. Look at Zendaya and Tom Holland. They got engaged without announcing it (people found out like several months later and only because she was spotted at an event in a ring that no jeweler's PR had announced was on loan to her, and then it was confirmed it was an engagement ring) and then no news about a wedding, and now it sounds like they already got married. Stuff like this is why people don't obsessively speculate about them, because they are just private and don't invite people in.

You can also do what Josh Allen and Haylee Steinfeld did and be more public (public engagement announcement, released wedding photos to press) but just be extremely straightforward and not dodgy about it -- we are getting married, yes the wedding is soon, here are pictures of our wedding. You can actually tamp down paparazzi obsessiveness if tabloids just know in advance they'll get good quality photos from the source and a press release in a timely way that avoids anyone being scooped. Take all the mystery out of it.

Or you can be extremely public about it but also keep it all a mystery to build maximum interest and speculation, and then complain that the scrutiny is unfairly intense. That is also an option.

Oh please. Nobody is near the level of stardom Taylor is - you’re seriously comparing them to Haylee and Josh? Ridiculous.

Rihanna is more popular than Taylor and she hasn’t released an album or toured in over a decade.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ESPN reports Travis is coming back for another NFL season. This isn't good for his mental and physical health. Another year for CTE to further metastasize.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/48153217/sources-travis-kelce-expected-return-chiefs

This is silly. The risk is small.

Small? He'll be 37 years old and plays one of the most physical positions. He's been playing for 25 years! It's a virtually guarantee he has CTE, only question is how severe.

Anonymous wrote:I do think if celebs want to avoid scrutiny of their relationships, it's not that hard. Look at Zendaya and Tom Holland. They got engaged without announcing it (people found out like several months later and only because she was spotted at an event in a ring that no jeweler's PR had announced was on loan to her, and then it was confirmed it was an engagement ring) and then no news about a wedding, and now it sounds like they already got married. Stuff like this is why people don't obsessively speculate about them, because they are just private and don't invite people in.

You can also do what Josh Allen and Haylee Steinfeld did and be more public (public engagement announcement, released wedding photos to press) but just be extremely straightforward and not dodgy about it -- we are getting married, yes the wedding is soon, here are pictures of our wedding. You can actually tamp down paparazzi obsessiveness if tabloids just know in advance they'll get good quality photos from the source and a press release in a timely way that avoids anyone being scooped. Take all the mystery out of it.

Or you can be extremely public about it but also keep it all a mystery to build maximum interest and speculation, and then complain that the scrutiny is unfairly intense. That is also an option.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ESPN reports Travis is coming back for another NFL season. This isn't good for his mental and physical health. Another year for CTE to further metastasize.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/48153217/sources-travis-kelce-expected-return-chiefs

This is silly. The risk is small.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do think if celebs want to avoid scrutiny of their relationships, it's not that hard. Look at Zendaya and Tom Holland. They got engaged without announcing it (people found out like several months later and only because she was spotted at an event in a ring that no jeweler's PR had announced was on loan to her, and then it was confirmed it was an engagement ring) and then no news about a wedding, and now it sounds like they already got married. Stuff like this is why people don't obsessively speculate about them, because they are just private and don't invite people in.

You can also do what Josh Allen and Haylee Steinfeld did and be more public (public engagement announcement, released wedding photos to press) but just be extremely straightforward and not dodgy about it -- we are getting married, yes the wedding is soon, here are pictures of our wedding. You can actually tamp down paparazzi obsessiveness if tabloids just know in advance they'll get good quality photos from the source and a press release in a timely way that avoids anyone being scooped. Take all the mystery out of it.

Or you can be extremely public about it but also keep it all a mystery to build maximum interest and speculation, and then complain that the scrutiny is unfairly intense. That is also an option.

Oh please. Nobody is near the level of stardom Taylor is - you’re seriously comparing them to Haylee and Josh? Ridiculous.

Anonymous wrote:I do think if celebs want to avoid scrutiny of their relationships, it's not that hard. Look at Zendaya and Tom Holland. They got engaged without announcing it (people found out like several months later and only because she was spotted at an event in a ring that no jeweler's PR had announced was on loan to her, and then it was confirmed it was an engagement ring) and then no news about a wedding, and now it sounds like they already got married. Stuff like this is why people don't obsessively speculate about them, because they are just private and don't invite people in.

You can also do what Josh Allen and Haylee Steinfeld did and be more public (public engagement announcement, released wedding photos to press) but just be extremely straightforward and not dodgy about it -- we are getting married, yes the wedding is soon, here are pictures of our wedding. You can actually tamp down paparazzi obsessiveness if tabloids just know in advance they'll get good quality photos from the source and a press release in a timely way that avoids anyone being scooped. Take all the mystery out of it.

Or you can be extremely public about it but also keep it all a mystery to build maximum interest and speculation, and then complain that the scrutiny is unfairly intense. That is also an option.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ESPN reports Travis is coming back for another NFL season. This isn't good for his mental and physical health. Another year for CTE to further metastasize.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/48153217/sources-travis-kelce-expected-return-chiefs

This is silly. The risk is small.

Anonymous wrote:ESPN reports Travis is coming back for another NFL season. This isn't good for his mental and physical health. Another year for CTE to further metastasize.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/48153217/sources-travis-kelce-expected-return-chiefs