Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero evidence she was ever a stay at home mom.

She had a full time nanny turned household manager, chef, housekeeper etc.

+1. All this spamming for her is so fake. It's hilarious.

I don't think so. There are a lot of SAHMs here married to wealthy men and this case hit a sensitive spot.

Nope. I've been married to one person for over 25 years, have two adult kids, and have worked in public schools for most of my adult life. I just happen to think that Kevin Costner, a "movie star" worth $400 million, has shown his cheapness since his engagement (with a dinky diamond) to Christine, a woman nearly 20 years younger. His cheapness continues.

This is an excellent point; given his net worth at the time of the engagement, he should’ve given her a rock worth millions - and that would have been something for her to use to support herself after he dumped her following the use of her for the most productive years of her life.

And yes, HE dumped her. She filed first and he was pissed because he had planned to file. What this whole situation has revealed is just exactly how huge a misogynist pig Kevin Costner is. Everything about how he treated Christine from day one is just gross.

Source that he was the one who asked for a divorce? I have seen this posted several times on this thread but nothing to back it up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero evidence she was ever a stay at home mom.

She had a full time nanny turned household manager, chef, housekeeper etc.

+1. All this spamming for her is so fake. It's hilarious.

I don't think so. There are a lot of SAHMs here married to wealthy men and this case hit a sensitive spot.

Nope. I've been married to one person for over 25 years, have two adult kids, and have worked in public schools for most of my adult life. I just happen to think that Kevin Costner, a "movie star" worth $400 million, has shown his cheapness since his engagement (with a dinky diamond) to Christine, a woman nearly 20 years younger. His cheapness continues.

This is an excellent point; given his net worth at the time of the engagement, he should’ve given her a rock worth millions - and that would have been something for her to use to support herself after he dumped her following the use of her for the most productive years of her life.

And yes, HE dumped her. She filed first and he was pissed because he had planned to file. What this whole situation has revealed is just exactly how huge a misogynist pig Kevin Costner is. Everything about how he treated Christine from day one is just gross.

There is zero proof of this yet people like you repeat this every 5 pages.

So how do you account for his incredibly pathetic behavior and attitude that reflect a lack of generosity for a wife of 20 years and the mother of his three children? Such a cheapskate.

Ok so you’ve just been making this rumor up because you believed that she was owed more money than she agreed to?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero evidence she was ever a stay at home mom.

She had a full time nanny turned household manager, chef, housekeeper etc.

+1. All this spamming for her is so fake. It's hilarious.

I don't think so. There are a lot of SAHMs here married to wealthy men and this case hit a sensitive spot.

Nope. I've been married to one person for over 25 years, have two adult kids, and have worked in public schools for most of my adult life. I just happen to think that Kevin Costner, a "movie star" worth $400 million, has shown his cheapness since his engagement (with a dinky diamond) to Christine, a woman nearly 20 years younger. His cheapness continues.

This is an excellent point; given his net worth at the time of the engagement, he should’ve given her a rock worth millions - and that would have been something for her to use to support herself after he dumped her following the use of her for the most productive years of her life.

And yes, HE dumped her. She filed first and he was pissed because he had planned to file. What this whole situation has revealed is just exactly how huge a misogynist pig Kevin Costner is. Everything about how he treated Christine from day one is just gross.

There is zero proof of this yet people like you repeat this every 5 pages.

So how do you account for his incredibly pathetic behavior and attitude that reflect a lack of generosity for a wife of 20 years and the mother of his three children? Such a cheapskate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero evidence she was ever a stay at home mom.

She had a full time nanny turned household manager, chef, housekeeper etc.

+1. All this spamming for her is so fake. It's hilarious.

I don't think so. There are a lot of SAHMs here married to wealthy men and this case hit a sensitive spot.

Nope. I've been married to one person for over 25 years, have two adult kids, and have worked in public schools for most of my adult life. I just happen to think that Kevin Costner, a "movie star" worth $400 million, has shown his cheapness since his engagement (with a dinky diamond) to Christine, a woman nearly 20 years younger. His cheapness continues.

This is an excellent point; given his net worth at the time of the engagement, he should’ve given her a rock worth millions - and that would have been something for her to use to support herself after he dumped her following the use of her for the most productive years of her life.

And yes, HE dumped her. She filed first and he was pissed because he had planned to file. What this whole situation has revealed is just exactly how huge a misogynist pig Kevin Costner is. Everything about how he treated Christine from day one is just gross.

There is zero proof of this yet people like you repeat this every 5 pages.

So how do you account for his incredibly pathetic behavior and attitude that reflect a lack of generosity for a wife of 20 years and the mother of his three children? Such a cheapskate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero evidence she was ever a stay at home mom.

She had a full time nanny turned household manager, chef, housekeeper etc.

+1. All this spamming for her is so fake. It's hilarious.

I don't think so. There are a lot of SAHMs here married to wealthy men and this case hit a sensitive spot.

Nope. I've been married to one person for over 25 years, have two adult kids, and have worked in public schools for most of my adult life. I just happen to think that Kevin Costner, a "movie star" worth $400 million, has shown his cheapness since his engagement (with a dinky diamond) to Christine, a woman nearly 20 years younger. His cheapness continues.

This is an excellent point; given his net worth at the time of the engagement, he should’ve given her a rock worth millions - and that would have been something for her to use to support herself after he dumped her following the use of her for the most productive years of her life.

And yes, HE dumped her. She filed first and he was pissed because he had planned to file. What this whole situation has revealed is just exactly how huge a misogynist pig Kevin Costner is. Everything about how he treated Christine from day one is just gross.

There is zero proof of this yet people like you repeat this every 5 pages.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero evidence she was ever a stay at home mom.

She had a full time nanny turned household manager, chef, housekeeper etc.

+1. All this spamming for her is so fake. It's hilarious.

I don't think so. There are a lot of SAHMs here married to wealthy men and this case hit a sensitive spot.

Nope. I've been married to one person for over 25 years, have two adult kids, and have worked in public schools for most of my adult life. I just happen to think that Kevin Costner, a "movie star" worth $400 million, has shown his cheapness since his engagement (with a dinky diamond) to Christine, a woman nearly 20 years younger. His cheapness continues.

This is an excellent point; given his net worth at the time of the engagement, he should’ve given her a rock worth millions - and that would have been something for her to use to support herself after he dumped her following the use of her for the most productive years of her life.

And yes, HE dumped her. She filed first and he was pissed because he had planned to file. What this whole situation has revealed is just exactly how huge a misogynist pig Kevin Costner is. Everything about how he treated Christine from day one is just gross.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue for Christine is that she’s also sunk her ability to marry again with her nonsense. Rich men will see the legal shenanigans and how the judge reacted, and stay away.

Nonsense. She's very pretty and appears to have been a good wife and mother. Most men and women can see that she had a luxurious life with Kevin but that he has been a controlling jerk who, despite having a net worth of 400 million, and giving his first wife 80 million, decided to play hardball/cheapskate with his much younger second wife. Not a generous way to be at all. Oh well, he's also had a child with a girlfriend between marriages. He probably figures he can find another trusting, gullible woman.

I don't understand why these guys don't get a vasectomy or just stay unmarried.

Serial sperminators are egomaniacs. I would not be surprised if he makes one more kid before heading off into the sunset.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue for Christine is that she’s also sunk her ability to marry again with her nonsense. Rich men will see the legal shenanigans and how the judge reacted, and stay away.

Nonsense. She's very pretty and appears to have been a good wife and mother. Most men and women can see that she had a luxurious life with Kevin but that he has been a controlling jerk who, despite having a net worth of 400 million, and giving his first wife 80 million, decided to play hardball/cheapskate with his much younger second wife. Not a generous way to be at all. Oh well, he's also had a child with a girlfriend between marriages. He probably figures he can find another trusting, gullible woman.

I don't understand why these guys don't get a vasectomy or just stay unmarried.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero evidence she was ever a stay at home mom.

She had a full time nanny turned household manager, chef, housekeeper etc.

+1. All this spamming for her is so fake. It's hilarious.

I don't think so. There are a lot of SAHMs here married to wealthy men and this case hit a sensitive spot.

Except she's the second wife. The SAHMs should be comparing themselves to Cindy who got 80M.

Rich men usually don’t make the same mistake twice. Ivana Trump got a hefty divorce settlement, Marla Maples did not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero evidence she was ever a stay at home mom.

She had a full time nanny turned household manager, chef, housekeeper etc.

+1. All this spamming for her is so fake. It's hilarious.

I don't think so. There are a lot of SAHMs here married to wealthy men and this case hit a sensitive spot.

Nope. I've been married to one person for over 25 years, have two adult kids, and have worked in public schools for most of my adult life. I just happen to think that Kevin Costner, a "movie star" worth $400 million, has shown his cheapness since his engagement (with a dinky diamond) to Christine, a woman nearly 20 years younger. His cheapness continues.

This is an excellent point; given his net worth at the time of the engagement, he should’ve given her a rock worth millions - and that would have been something for her to use to support herself after he dumped her following the use of her for the most productive years of her life.

And yes, HE dumped her. She filed first and he was pissed because he had planned to file. What this whole situation has revealed is just exactly how huge a misogynist pig Kevin Costner is. Everything about how he treated Christine from day one is just gross.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero evidence she was ever a stay at home mom.

She had a full time nanny turned household manager, chef, housekeeper etc.

+1. All this spamming for her is so fake. It's hilarious.

I don't think so. There are a lot of SAHMs here married to wealthy men and this case hit a sensitive spot.

Except she's the second wife. The SAHMs should be comparing themselves to Cindy who got 80M.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero evidence she was ever a stay at home mom.

She had a full time nanny turned household manager, chef, housekeeper etc.

+1. All this spamming for her is so fake. It's hilarious.

I don't think so. There are a lot of SAHMs here married to wealthy men and this case hit a sensitive spot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero evidence she was ever a stay at home mom.

She had a full time nanny turned household manager, chef, housekeeper etc.

+1. All this spamming for her is so fake. It's hilarious.

I don't think so. There are a lot of SAHMs here married to wealthy men and this case hit a sensitive spot.

Nope. I've been married to one person for over 25 years, have two adult kids, and have worked in public schools for most of my adult life. I just happen to think that Kevin Costner, a "movie star" worth $400 million, has shown his cheapness since his engagement (with a dinky diamond) to Christine, a woman nearly 20 years younger. His cheapness continues.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The issue for Christine is that she’s also sunk her ability to marry again with her nonsense. Rich men will see the legal shenanigans and how the judge reacted, and stay away.

Nonsense. She's very pretty and appears to have been a good wife and mother. Most men and women can see that she had a luxurious life with Kevin but that he has been a controlling jerk who, despite having a net worth of 400 million, and giving his first wife 80 million, decided to play hardball/cheapskate with his much younger second wife. Not a generous way to be at all. Oh well, he's also had a child with a girlfriend between marriages. He probably figures he can find another trusting, gullible woman.

Anonymous wrote:The issue for Christine is that she’s also sunk her ability to marry again with her nonsense. Rich men will see the legal shenanigans and how the judge reacted, and stay away.