Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Haven't most Americans ordered donuts at some point in their lives?
Don't they serve a variety of donuts after mass? They do at my church.
It's not like he's George H.W. Bush who had never seen a grocery store scanner.
This was the best he could do because he comes off as hostile and spoiling for a fight in every video I've seen. He tried to seem friendly.
JD and Usha hate lower caste Americans and they can’t help but project their disdain. JD is a terrible politician with negative charisma.
Trump has negative charisma - he's hateful, but compelling. Vance just has bad vibes, like really bad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Haven't most Americans ordered donuts at some point in their lives?
Don't they serve a variety of donuts after mass? They do at my church.
It's not like he's George H.W. Bush who had never seen a grocery store scanner.
This was the best he could do because he comes off as hostile and spoiling for a fight in every video I've seen. He tried to seem friendly.
JD and Usha hate lower caste Americans and they can’t help but project their disdain. JD is a terrible politician with negative charisma.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As they used to say on Seinfeld, not that there’s anything wrong with it, but does anyone get a gay (or maybe the term is “questioning”) vibe from JD Vance?
No. I get a desperate incel vibe from him. You can't tell whether he is straight or gay, but he definitely comes off as someone so awkward and undesirable that no one would be interested in spending time with him other than to make fun of him. He's almost pitiable.
Then along comes Peter Thiel who probably did groom him and pushed him into venture capitol. He made money, but wasn't very good at it. The one project he tried very hard and stuck with for more than a year or so, ended up folding and he managed to extricate himself from it a few months before it went bankrupt, but he was very involved with it, so probably was pretty instrumental in the collapse.
Anonymous wrote:Vance may go down as the worst VP pick ever in history.
He'll do well in the debates since he likes to attack, but it will just increase his unlikeable factor IMO.
Anonymous wrote:
Walz's "George W Bush high on Halloween candy" schtick is off-putting, but that's where we are. Goofy doofuses are fine people, but not Presidential.
He's basically daring Trump and Vance to prove thet aren't lizard people in skin suits, and they can't do it. That's where the bar is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I actually hate this man. I would be happy to donate to any strong challenger in Ohio who wants to take away his Senate seat in 4 years. Vance sucks.
Futile. Incumbent senators basically never lose. He is a an eager scholarship boy sellout plucked from central casting, backdoored into YLS with mediocre stats, and given a book and movie deal to be a politician for the next 40 years. They want this dweeb as the face of open borders, WWIII, and globalism.
I think your ChatGPT lost track of who you were trying to smear.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Vance may go down as the worst VP pick ever in history.
He'll do well in the debates since he likes to attack, but it will just increase his unlikeable factor IMO.
He's not some seasoned litigator. He's going to get clobbered by Tim.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Vance may go down as the worst VP pick ever in history.
He'll do well in the debates since he likes to attack, but it will just increase his unlikeable factor IMO.
He's not some seasoned litigator. He's going to get clobbered by Tim.
Anonymous wrote:Vance may go down as the worst VP pick ever in history.
He'll do well in the debates since he likes to attack, but it will just increase his unlikeable factor IMO.