Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So to sum up, the people here advocating to move other families’ kids also believe that schools don’t affect property values.

That tells you all you need to know about the absurdity of their position.

And to the very ill-informed who are arguing based on this premise, you should make a realtor friend so you can understand why you are bafoonishly wrong.

I don't care about your property value. Why should I? Why should anyone, except you?

I'm baffled that anyone thinks a convincing argument to the universe is that their house might be worth less.
I really could not care less.

You'd care a lot more if you held an elected position.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So to sum up, the people here advocating to move other families’ kids also believe that schools don’t affect property values.

That tells you all you need to know about the absurdity of their position.

And to the very ill-informed who are arguing based on this premise, you should make a realtor friend so you can understand why you are bafoonishly wrong.

I don't care about your property value. Why should I? Why should anyone, except you?

I'm baffled that anyone thinks a convincing argument to the universe is that their house might be worth less.
I really could not care less.

You do not care anyone's kids that will be impacted, namely kids in Oakton, Chantilly or Centreville.

Why you come here to dictate where should we be rezoned to?

You care about moving other people kids to gain benefit for yourself.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is the whole County residence's best interest to united to advocate to stay where we bought our house at.

Remember we as parents of fcps students share the same interest for our own kids, you do not share anything in common with people trying to move other people's kids.

Yesterday was Langley and McLean.

Today is Oakton and Chantilly and Centreville.

Who will be next?

They will find another targeted kids to move next. Would that be you?

You are welcome to stay where you bought your house. FCPS has NEVER guaranteed boundaries though.

From the current boundary locator: "FCPS provides no guarantee that any residential address will continually be served by the same elementary, middle, and/or high school(s) or AAP center(s)."

More people are moving out of Fairfax than are moving in, and the numbers are big. That number will keep growthing if fcps school sink.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So to sum up, the people here advocating to move other families’ kids also believe that schools don’t affect property values.

That tells you all you need to know about the absurdity of their position.

And to the very ill-informed who are arguing based on this premise, you should make a realtor friend so you can understand why you are bafoonishly wrong.

I don't care about your property value. Why should I? Why should anyone, except you?

I'm baffled that anyone thinks a convincing argument to the universe is that their house might be worth less.
I really could not care less.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So to sum up, the people here advocating to move other families’ kids also believe that schools don’t affect property values.

That tells you all you need to know about the absurdity of their position.

And to the very ill-informed who are arguing based on this premise, you should make a realtor friend so you can understand why you are bafoonishly wrong.

I don't care about your property value. Why should I? Why should anyone, except you?

I'm baffled that anyone thinks a convincing argument to the universe is that their house might be worth less.
I really could not care less.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So to sum up, the people here advocating to move other families’ kids also believe that schools don’t affect property values.

That tells you all you need to know about the absurdity of their position.

And to the very ill-informed who are arguing based on this premise, you should make a realtor friend so you can understand why you are bafoonishly wrong.

I don't care about your property value. Why should I? Why should anyone, except you?

Anonymous wrote:My kid went to South County and I happened to be in the area today and wanted to see what all the gossip had been about. Last last two High Schools FCPS has built had tons of outdoor space and I guess I assumed they would want the same. Both schools (Westfield & South County) have a two stadium type setup with multiple grass fields and baseball and softball on site. I guess I was expecting something similar, but I'm sorry to offend you for bringing it up. The footprint of the property seemed so small and caught me off guard I guess.

Anonymous wrote:Just drove around Skyview for the first time today. There doesn't appear to be much athletic space or parking. I saw also saw no baseball fields, softball fields, or tennis courts. Stadium would need a major expansion that would eat into the already limited parking. Not sure how this would all work. Has FCPS ever released any plans for how they would build/setup these facilities? Might help people get on board if they knew what the plans were.

Anonymous wrote:So to sum up, the people here advocating to move other families’ kids also believe that schools don’t affect property values.

That tells you all you need to know about the absurdity of their position.

And to the very ill-informed who are arguing based on this premise, you should make a realtor friend so you can understand why you are bafoonishly wrong.

Anonymous wrote:My kid went to South County and I happened to be in the area today and wanted to see what all the gossip had been about. Last last two High Schools FCPS has built had tons of outdoor space and I guess I assumed they would want the same. Both schools (Westfield & South County) have a two stadium type setup with multiple grass fields and baseball and softball on site. I guess I was expecting something similar, but I'm sorry to offend you for bringing it up. The footprint of the property seemed so small and caught me off guard I guess.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why the SB and Reid and FCPS admin are spending so much time and effort getting community feedback. Every management decision is not a democracy. They were presumably elected or hired for their competence in administrating school system. Set the boundaries and move on. Stop catering to individual HOAs or PTA presidents or whoever,

It seems like the loudest, most-well connected voices are getting their way with the current ridiculous process. If FCPS wants us all to "get a vote" on the boundaries, set up a vote. If they don't want to do that, then make a decision using your so called expertise and judgment and move us all on.

You keep saying that FCPS shouldn’t listen to families, and we keep telling you how absolutely absurd that is. Sounds like you just don’t want to put in the effort that others do to advocate for your own kids.

Feedback is one thing. But, it should be based on facts and not emotion.
RIO's facts are "I want." Everyone wants stability and a good school. Not just RIO. Everyone wants good property values. There is no reason to think property values will drop.

I've not seen one concrete reason why Crossfield should not go to Skyview. Not one. Oakton is at capacity and there are currently well over 50 new construction homes in the boundary--and many more to come. It is puzzling why the data was not included in the presentation last month.

The new schools will have sports. VHSL sports.
The new school will have challenging AP classes and electives.
The new school will save money on transportation.
The new school will save time on commute--better quality of life.
The new school will be a community school. Crossfield families shop in the Skyview area. The children play sports in the Skyview area.

Oakton parents works hard and paid for high price for their property.

You are saying it is fair to move other people's kids without concrete reason? What benefit bring you by moving other people' kids?

Oakton parents do not shop in Skyview area.

Ask Chantilly parents, ask Mclean Parents, ask Great Falls parents, ask Centreville parents, they will tell you the same reason why they need to stay.

The only people who want to go to Kyview is because the see their house value will increase a lot by rezoned to Skyview.

I would say it is fair for you to give up your home so other people can live in your home and you should work hard to support them!

What a dumb post. Oakton parents work hard to buy their house? Sheesh.
I’ve got news for you. Pretty much all parents are working hard and doing the best they can to buy a house in the best neighborhood they can afford. Oakton parents are not unique whatsoever. Except maybe stupider if they think paying all that money for a house is going to result in a better outcome for their kid.

Go visit the college forum and you’ll see that it’s a wash. Oakton is an incredibly competitive high school. It is harder for kids to stand out or make sports teams. As an example, it is easier to get into UVA from South Lakes compared to Oakton. I’m not sure all of the hustle is worth it.

I just think it's funny that so many people think that the value of their house is based on the high school it's zoned to. There are $2 Million houses zoned to crappy high schools, it's location based. This area is close to Reston where there are a lot of jobs and an easy commute to Tysons, where there are also a lot of jobs. Home values are going to keep going up, not because of the high school they are zoned to, but because this is a high demand area due to high paying jobs within an easy commute.

Anonymous wrote:My kid went to South County and I happened to be in the area today and wanted to see what all the gossip had been about. Last last two High Schools FCPS has built had tons of outdoor space and I guess I assumed they would want the same. Both schools (Westfield & South County) have a two stadium type setup with multiple grass fields and baseball and softball on site. I guess I was expecting something similar, but I'm sorry to offend you for bringing it up. The footprint of the property seemed so small and caught me off guard I guess.