Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Glad they are not covering it. I have no intention of watching a piece produced by a former ABC exec who, by the way, happened to spike the story about Jeffrey Epstein.
If they have to hire a TV producer to choreograph a hearing, they are going for drama. With Democrats, it's all about the optics.
Welcome, Traitors! 500,000 American soldiers died in WWII to protect democracy and you hand it over to a fat-assed, lying clown with an elaborate combover. MAGA!
Anonymous wrote:
Glad they are not covering it. I have no intention of watching a piece produced by a former ABC exec who, by the way, happened to spike the story about Jeffrey Epstein.
If they have to hire a TV producer to choreograph a hearing, they are going for drama. With Democrats, it's all about the optics.
Anonymous wrote:
Glad they are not covering it. I have no intention of watching a piece produced by a former ABC exec who, by the way, happened to spike the story about Jeffrey Epstein.
If they have to hire a TV producer to choreograph a hearing, they are going for drama. With Democrats, it's all about the optics.
Anonymous wrote:
Glad they are not covering it. I have no intention of watching a piece produced by a former ABC exec who, by the way, happened to spike the story about Jeffrey Epstein.
If they have to hire a TV producer to choreograph a hearing, they are going for drama. With Democrats, it's all about the optics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Glad they are not covering it. I have no intention of watching a piece produced by a former ABC exec who, by the way, happened to spike the story about Jeffrey Epstein.
If they have to hire a TV producer to choreograph a hearing, they are going for drama. With Democrats, it's all about the optics.
You sound like a fool then. I would watch a literal circus if it meant being able to find out more about what happened that day. What bit I saw live on TV was outrageous (there's optics for you) and I want to know who is behind it.
Anonymous wrote:
then maybe fox should show the unabridged version, like cspan does, with zero commentary and bias. Right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Glad they are not covering it. I have no intention of watching a piece produced by a former ABC exec who, by the way, happened to spike the story about Jeffrey Epstein.
If they have to hire a TV producer to choreograph a hearing, they are going for drama. With Democrats, it's all about the optics.
You sound like a fool then. I would watch a literal circus if it meant being able to find out more about what happened that day. What bit I saw live on TV was outrageous (there's optics for you) and I want to know who is behind it.
Anonymous wrote:
Glad they are not covering it. I have no intention of watching a piece produced by a former ABC exec who, by the way, happened to spike the story about Jeffrey Epstein.
If they have to hire a TV producer to choreograph a hearing, they are going for drama. With Democrats, it's all about the optics.
Anonymous wrote:
Glad they are not covering it. I have no intention of watching a piece produced by a former ABC exec who, by the way, happened to spike the story about Jeffrey Epstein.
If they have to hire a TV producer to choreograph a hearing, they are going for drama. With Democrats, it's all about the optics.
[…]