Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.
And that has nothing to do with today’s PP and its mission. The founders of this nation, the writers of the Constitution owned human beings and thought Africans were inferior. Yet we do not dismiss this country or its Constitution because the founders were flawed.
I noticed PP likes to set up its abortion mills in poor minority neighborhoods. They are clearly targeting poor black girls and women. They are racists just like founder Margeret Sanger was.
PP provides healthcare to women. It’s really disgusting how much you hate that.
It's interesting that I never hear anyone say they've been to PP for healthcare. They do mention going to "doc in a box," emergency room, primary care physician, internist, OB/GYN, or the health dept.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.
And that has nothing to do with today’s PP and its mission. The founders of this nation, the writers of the Constitution owned human beings and thought Africans were inferior. Yet we do not dismiss this country or its Constitution because the founders were flawed.
I noticed PP likes to set up its abortion mills in poor minority neighborhoods. They are clearly targeting poor black girls and women. They are racists just like founder Margeret Sanger was.
PP provides healthcare to women. It’s really disgusting how much you hate that.
It's interesting that I never hear anyone say they've been to PP for healthcare. They do mention going to "doc in a box," emergency room, primary care physician, internist, OB/GYN, or the health dept.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.
And that has nothing to do with today’s PP and its mission. The founders of this nation, the writers of the Constitution owned human beings and thought Africans were inferior. Yet we do not dismiss this country or its Constitution because the founders were flawed.
I noticed PP likes to set up its abortion mills in poor minority neighborhoods. They are clearly targeting poor black girls and women. They are racists just like founder Margeret Sanger was.
PP provides healthcare to women. It’s really disgusting how much you hate that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.
No, she didn’t. But idiot pro-birthed try to push that narrative - taking her comments out of context. She did more for “inferior” people than most others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.
And that has nothing to do with today’s PP and its mission. The founders of this nation, the writers of the Constitution owned human beings and thought Africans were inferior. Yet we do not dismiss this country or its Constitution because the founders were flawed.
I noticed PP likes to set up its abortion mills in poor minority neighborhoods. They are clearly targeting poor black girls and women. They are racists just like founder Margeret Sanger was.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.
And that has nothing to do with today’s PP and its mission. The founders of this nation, the writers of the Constitution owned human beings and thought Africans were inferior. Yet we do not dismiss this country or its Constitution because the founders were flawed.
I noticed PP likes to set up its abortion mills in poor minority neighborhoods. They are clearly targeting poor black girls and women. They are racists just like founder Margeret Sanger was.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.
And that has nothing to do with today’s PP and its mission. The founders of this nation, the writers of the Constitution owned human beings and thought Africans were inferior. Yet we do not dismiss this country or its Constitution because the founders were flawed.
I noticed PP likes to set up its abortion mills in poor minority neighborhoods. They are clearly targeting poor black girls and women. They are racists just like founder Margeret Sanger was.
Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.
And that has nothing to do with today’s PP and its mission. The founders of this nation, the writers of the Constitution owned human beings and thought Africans were inferior. Yet we do not dismiss this country or its Constitution because the founders were flawed.
Anonymous wrote:Founder of PP hated "inferior" people.
Anonymous wrote:
Someone here has to care about the children.
This more of us, the better...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Abortion should be a woman’s right to choose - end of story.
Similarly child support should be a man’s right to choose.
There should be zero compulsion by the state regarding child support just as the state should not interfere in a woman’s right to choose.
That's a completely incoherent point of view. But go ahead and continue to try to use your HS debate tactics.
Why is it incoherent?
Why do you support one and not the other?
A woman shouldn’t be compelled to do something she doesn’t want to, and likewise a man shouldn’t either
So it’s not really about the rights of the child for you, it’s just about punishing women for not behaving the way men want. Got it.
Yep. The incels have decided to make this their next issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Abortion should be a woman’s right to choose - end of story.
Similarly child support should be a man’s right to choose.
There should be zero compulsion by the state regarding child support just as the state should not interfere in a woman’s right to choose.
That's a completely incoherent point of view. But go ahead and continue to try to use your HS debate tactics.
Why is it incoherent?
Why do you support one and not the other?
A woman shouldn’t be compelled to do something she doesn’t want to, and likewise a man shouldn’t either
So it’s not really about the rights of the child for you, it’s just about punishing women for not behaving the way men want. Got it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Abortion should be a woman’s right to choose - end of story.
Similarly child support should be a man’s right to choose.
There should be zero compulsion by the state regarding child support just as the state should not interfere in a woman’s right to choose.
That's a completely incoherent point of view. But go ahead and continue to try to use your HS debate tactics.
Why is it incoherent?
Why do you support one and not the other?
A woman shouldn’t be compelled to do something she doesn’t want to, and likewise a man shouldn’t either
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Abortion should be a woman’s right to choose - end of story.
Similarly child support should be a man’s right to choose.
There should be zero compulsion by the state regarding child support just as the state should not interfere in a woman’s right to choose.
So you don’t believe children should have a right to parental support?
No.