Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Americans calling Trudeau a fascist aren't too worked up about Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Obviously because Putin is behaving true to form whilst Trudeau’s behavior is entirely at odds with expectations in a liberal democracy. If you can’t understand the difference then you have bigger issues.

So, hypocrisy is a greater sin than invading a neighboring country. Got it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Large protest movements who plan to be in DC must apply for permission for a special event. Why? Because while protesting is a right, it is not an unqualified one. That is, the right to protest doesn’t supersede every other right for every other person. Other people in the city want to do other things. The point is, protests always must take place within the bounds of recognizing other rights and other people’s rights. There is no right to shutdown the world because you want to. That is not freedom.

BLM and Antifa are calling

Go back to parler you creep. No comparison between the groups. You asshats try to be masters at normalizing lies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Americans calling Trudeau a fascist aren't too worked up about Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

We are. The difference your dense brain can’t comprehend is that we already know modern USSR is why it is. However, Canada and Trudeau sell themselves as an example of liberal democracy. Yet he’s actually behaving worse than Putin or Trump. Try not to laugh.

Did Trudeau invade Alaska? It's hard not to laugh when you guys make such idiots of yourselves.

He invaded the bank accounts, driving permits and right to work of many people. Besides seizing 10 million dollars from donations. Yes, Trudeau is another fascist graduated from Klaus Schwab’s WEF Young global leaders. Truck him!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Americans calling Trudeau a fascist aren't too worked up about Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Obviously because Putin is behaving true to form whilst Trudeau’s behavior is entirely at odds with expectations in a liberal democracy. If you can’t understand the difference then you have bigger issues.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Americans calling Trudeau a fascist aren't too worked up about Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

We are. The difference your dense brain can’t comprehend is that we already know modern USSR is why it is. However, Canada and Trudeau sell themselves as an example of liberal democracy. Yet he’s actually behaving worse than Putin or Trump. Try not to laugh.

Did Trudeau invade Alaska? It's hard not to laugh when you guys make such idiots of yourselves.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Americans calling Trudeau a fascist aren't too worked up about Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Obviously because Putin is behaving true to form whilst Trudeau’s behavior is entirely at odds with expectations in a liberal democracy. If you can’t understand the difference then you have bigger issues.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Americans calling Trudeau a fascist aren't too worked up about Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

We are. The difference your dense brain can’t comprehend is that we already know modern USSR is why it is. However, Canada and Trudeau sell themselves as an example of liberal democracy. Yet he’s actually behaving worse than Putin or Trump. Try not to laugh.

Anonymous wrote:The Americans calling Trudeau a fascist aren't too worked up about Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Americans calling Trudeau a fascist aren't too worked up about Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

We are. The difference your dense brain can’t comprehend is that we already know modern USSR is why it is. However, Canada and Trudeau sell themselves as an example of liberal democracy. Yet he’s actually behaving worse than Putin or Trump. Try not to laugh.

Anonymous wrote:The Americans calling Trudeau a fascist aren't too worked up about Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We also learned that some pp thinks truckers and essential staff should be jailed if they walk away from their jobs!!

Nobody is being jailed. They are welcome to quit. They just don't want to.

Again, read the thread. One pp thinks that essential staff should be jailed if they quit.

I think Jeff deleted some of the more egregious comments about forced labor

Sure, but it doesn’t change the fact that some of the more deranged amongst us have radical views on the topic.

The topic itself is radical. It's terrorism.

The topic can nothing to do with pp thinking that nurses, doctors, truckers, etc. should not be allowed to quit and should be jailed if they stop working their essential jobs. It was an unhinged person.

Yes it does. Radical acts of terrorism get correspondingly radical responses. It used to be law in Canada as recently as 2015 that nurses were not allowed to quit their jobs. In the U.S., a military member who goes AWOL before their service is up will get thrown in the brig.

More action in downtown Ottawa today, than in previous 3 weeks!

Sure, peaceful protestors are “radical terrorists”. Time to add more tinfoil to your hat nutjob.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We also learned that some pp thinks truckers and essential staff should be jailed if they walk away from their jobs!!

Nobody is being jailed. They are welcome to quit. They just don't want to.

Again, read the thread. One pp thinks that essential staff should be jailed if they quit.

I think Jeff deleted some of the more egregious comments about forced labor

Sure, but it doesn’t change the fact that some of the more deranged amongst us have radical views on the topic.

The topic itself is radical. It's terrorism.

The topic can nothing to do with pp thinking that nurses, doctors, truckers, etc. should not be allowed to quit and should be jailed if they stop working their essential jobs. It was an unhinged person.

Yes it does. Radical acts of terrorism get correspondingly radical responses. It used to be law in Canada as recently as 2015 that nurses were not allowed to quit their jobs. In the U.S., a military member who goes AWOL before their service is up will get thrown in the brig.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These truckers are dangerous people!

But what makes them especially dangerous is their trucks. Hundreds of thousands of pounds of destructive force, capable of high speed attacks.

These solid metal trucks alone can take down a building!

It’s time we recognize this danger and call them what they are: assault trucks.

Exactly. Don't forget what Timothy McVeigh used in the OKC bombing that killed 168 people.

A small rental truck?

Yes, it was small. Think of how much more destruction these big rigs can cause.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Large protest movements who plan to be in DC must apply for permission for a special event. Why? Because while protesting is a right, it is not an unqualified one. That is, the right to protest doesn’t supersede every other right for every other person. Other people in the city want to do other things. The point is, protests always must take place within the bounds of recognizing other rights and other people’s rights. There is no right to shutdown the world because you want to. That is not freedom.

BLM and Antifa are calling