Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More detail on the Horowitz investigation. It doesn't sound like he will find any evidence of "spying" or improper activity by the FBI.
As such, will we get any sort of acknowledgement that the investigation is with merit and as such, the words in the Mueller Report have integrity?
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/09/us/politics/ig-russia-investigation-steele.html
I forgot the link
We’ll see. The nyt hasn’t been reliable for quite some time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More detail on the Horowitz investigation. It doesn't sound like he will find any evidence of "spying" or improper activity by the FBI.
As such, will we get any sort of acknowledgement that the investigation is with merit and as such, the words in the Mueller Report have integrity?
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/09/us/politics/ig-russia-investigation-steele.html
I forgot the link
Anonymous wrote:More detail on the Horowitz investigation. It doesn't sound like he will find any evidence of "spying" or improper activity by the FBI.
As such, will we get any sort of acknowledgement that the investigation is with merit and as such, the words in the Mueller Report have integrity?
Anonymous wrote:More detail on the Horowitz investigation. It doesn't sound like he will find any evidence of "spying" or improper activity by the FBI.
As such, will we get any sort of acknowledgement that the investigation is with merit and as such, the words in the Mueller Report have integrity?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/09/christopher-steele-trump-dossier-doj-1403318
The interview was contentious at first, the sources added, but investigators ultimately found Steele’s testimony credible and even surprising. The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016. Steele’s American lawyer was present for the conversation.
Oh, look..... Steele's attorneys spoke off the record.
Read the article. It specifically says that this will likely take the wind out of the sails of the Trump supporters who think the IG s going to come out with a blistering report against Mueller.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/09/christopher-steele-trump-dossier-doj-1403318
The interview was contentious at first, the sources added, but investigators ultimately found Steele’s testimony credible and even surprising. The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016. Steele’s American lawyer was present for the conversation.
Oh, look..... Steele's attorneys spoke off the record.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/09/christopher-steele-trump-dossier-doj-1403318
The interview was contentious at first, the sources added, but investigators ultimately found Steele’s testimony credible and even surprising. The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016. Steele’s American lawyer was present for the conversation.
Oh, look..... Steele's attorneys spoke off the record.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/09/christopher-steele-trump-dossier-doj-1403318
The interview was contentious at first, the sources added, but investigators ultimately found Steele’s testimony credible and even surprising. The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016. Steele’s American lawyer was present for the conversation.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/09/christopher-steele-trump-dossier-doj-1403318
The interview was contentious at first, the sources added, but investigators ultimately found Steele’s testimony credible and even surprising. The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016. Steele’s American lawyer was present for the conversation.
Anonymous wrote:Exoneration parade round 2. Coming to a special committee near you!
https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/25/mueller-to-testify-before-congress/
Olc said he could charge the pres but he didn’t? Why?
When did he know the president was innocent? Why did he keep soaking the taxpayers for his 400 page exoneration.
answers coming soon!
Be interesting to see if gonadler and pencilneck ask even remotely intelligent questions.