Anonymous wrote:Yes, you've persuaded me. Everything about the Common Core is bad. Including things that have nothing to do with the Common Core. Even the words "a" and "the" are bad, when they appear in the Common Core standards. Proper planning would have prevented their appearance, and it's impossible to implement them properly. My proof? There is an 'a' in Holocaust. Whose fault is that? Follow the money. (Hint: Arne also starts with an 'a'.)
Have you ever heard of "unintended consequences"? With the requirements for its implementations, good teachers will be fired and mediocre teachers may game the system.
Yes, you've persuaded me. Everything about the Common Core is bad. Including things that have nothing to do with the Common Core. Even the words "a" and "the" are bad, when they appear in the Common Core standards. Proper planning would have prevented their appearance, and it's impossible to implement them properly. My proof? There is an 'a' in Holocaust. Whose fault is that? Follow the money. (Hint: Arne also starts with an 'a'.)
Anonymous wrote:Yes, you've persuaded me. Everything about the Common Core is bad. Including things that have nothing to do with the Common Core. Even the words "a" and "the" are bad, when they appear in the Common Core standards. Proper planning would have prevented their appearance, and it's impossible to implement them properly. My proof? There is an 'a' in Holocaust. Whose fault is that? Follow the money. (Hint: Arne also starts with an 'a'.)
Anonymous wrote:Problem is: in the DC area, there may be cause to be concerned about flooding in your basement. Nevada, not so much. So, why do Nevadans have to plan for flooding in the basement just because DC says so?
Get the federal government out of stormwater management. These things should be handled at the local level. Follow the money, baby! Also, Obamacare.
[Report Post]
Anonymous wrote:
Wrong. My basement flooded last week when it rained because the federal government is involved in stormwater management, and it doesn't say anything in the Constitution about stormwater management. But we have become inured to these unconstitutional federal activities, because of the Common Core. Don't believe me? Follow the money.
Anonymous wrote:Today: 12:25
Anonymous wrote:Yes, it certainly would be harder to remove a Holocaust-denial assignment from the national curriculum, if there were a national curriculum with a Holocaust-denial assignment in it, which not only there isn't, but there never would be.
The PP is right -- this is actually an argument FOR a national curriculum, not against one.
Anonymous wrote:The discussion was in response to the poster who thinks we need a national curriculum.
Anonymous wrote:Problem is: in the DC area, there may be cause to be concerned about flooding in your basement. Nevada, not so much. So, why do Nevadans have to plan for flooding in the basement just because DC says so?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't like Common core, but this mess about the holocaust denial has nothing to do with it.
When a district states the paper was to meet common core standards, you have an issue. Clearly, the district didn't understand Common Core. Why is that?