Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Exactly, I was just going to post that. The GOP talking point says: "Forcefully refute Democrat lies regarding GOP positions on abortion and women's health care," it adds, saying Republicans do not want to take away contraception, mammograms and female health care or throw doctors and women in jail.”
But they sure are doing that!! Stupid people need to look at their actions/laws they passed and wake up!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So no response on what if the woman wants to give up full custody of the embryo. I feel that The father should have to pay to incubate it somewhere, whether that be a medical lab or a another woman, a surrogate whoever they want. So instead of terminating the pregnancy it can just be moved somewhere else at his expense.
I'll agree to that as soon as a guy can decide to keep a baby the mother does not want and and force her to pay child support for 18 years. A guy has no say at the moment but can be forced to support an unwanted child, fair is fair
Both the bio mom and bio dad will be on the hook to support the child. GOP voters won’t want their taxes going towards supporting those new mouths.
I foresee lots of dumpster babies, courtesy of the GOP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So no response on what if the woman wants to give up full custody of the embryo. I feel that The father should have to pay to incubate it somewhere, whether that be a medical lab or a another woman, a surrogate whoever they want. So instead of terminating the pregnancy it can just be moved somewhere else at his expense.
I'll agree to that as soon as a guy can decide to keep a baby the mother does not want and and force her to pay child support for 18 years. A guy has no say at the moment but can be forced to support an unwanted child, fair is fair
Both the bio mom and bio dad will be on the hook to support the child. GOP voters won’t want their taxes going towards supporting those new mouths.
I foresee lots of dumpster babies, courtesy of the GOP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So do women not get the right to life anymore?. Last I heard it was in the Constitution and I shouldn't have to give up my life to bring another one into this world
Are you serious? It's not in the Constitution. It's in the Declaration of Independence.
It is in the Constitution, though.
“No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
So make a law at the federal level![]()
Again, what makes you think this court wouldn’t invalidate that law?
Make sure it follows constitutional guidelines and they won’t
I am curious, under what power would the federal government be able to regulate abortions?
Anonymous wrote:
Exactly, I was just going to post that. The GOP talking point says: "Forcefully refute Democrat lies regarding GOP positions on abortion and women's health care," it adds, saying Republicans do not want to take away contraception, mammograms and female health care or throw doctors and women in jail.”
But they sure are doing that!! Stupid people need to look at their actions/laws they passed and wake up!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So no response on what if the woman wants to give up full custody of the embryo. I feel that The father should have to pay to incubate it somewhere, whether that be a medical lab or a another woman, a surrogate whoever they want. So instead of terminating the pregnancy it can just be moved somewhere else at his expense.
I'll agree to that as soon as a guy can decide to keep a baby the mother does not want and and force her to pay child support for 18 years. A guy has no say at the moment but can be forced to support an unwanted child, fair is fair
Both the bio mom and bio dad will be on the hook to support the child. GOP voters won’t want their taxes going towards supporting those new mouths.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Women need to start withholding sex from men—period. Vibrators are better anyway!
Seriously, we need to STRIKE FAST and HARD on this: SEX Ban imposed on ALL Men in Washington Starting Next Monday ( one week from the leak):
No Senator, Congressman, Legislative Aid, Staffer, Head of Communications, Lawyer, Lobbyist, Media personality,Pentagon, CIA, US Atty's Office, FBI office IS GETTING LAID
EVER Again starting NEXT Monday- until a Constitutional Amendment is passed that says, " a woman has domain over her own body and any decision she makes with it is between her and her MD and no law can be passed by Any State or Federal Body Abridging her right to control what enters , grows inside ( or not ) and leaves her own body" " Her gifts to the world are through her own labor and are therefore her own free choice and cannot be compelled"
And as for the " GOOd men" who want to Support us NO SEX for them Either until they Take the defense of US inTo High Gear
Also, Every Actress in America on TV and in Movies SHOULD Effective Next Monday REFUSE to have her sexuality exploited to make profits for Print media, film , TV, online Ads - let hairy , fat men try to sell products using only hairy fat men as Advertising.
ALL WOMEN Report to Washington for Protests: so, no Teaching in schools, no Nursing in Hospitals - You are Needed in Washington Instead
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't planned parenthood just cover the flights + hotels for women to go have abortions in blue states?
I think this could be a key effort. Setup PP clinics for women in red states, fly them first class to blue states, and put them up at the Ritz.
Y’all. No, they can’t in many states. Aiding abortion would be a crime. Do you all really think people haven’t thought of this?
So… the Confederacy has basically revived the Fugitive Slave Act?
I wonder when Republican White ladies will catch on to how their party thinks of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Keep your legs closed and it's not a problem
Keep your pecker in your pants and it's not a problem. Better yet, force men to get vasectomies. Problem solved.
Anonymous wrote:You know, with so much political sorting in this country, especially by state, I'm not convinced overturning Roe will be a big significant political event. Yes, it's possible there will be marginal shifts in suburban purple districts. But if local laws reflect he prevailing local opinion, we may see very little effect.
Anonymous wrote:So… the Confederacy has basically revived the Fugitive Slave Act?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, raise child support payments to include full time salary while a woman is home with her " forced birth baby" for the first 18 months of life- so men pay the woman's salary plus essentials for the baby and RENT
In DC , that should be about $2,500 for rent plus $1,000 for food plus $600 month for health insurance , plus more for supplemental day care ( $1800 mos ) FOR EACh and EVERY Forced Birth= about $6,000 a month every man in DC has to pay a woman who is FORCED to have " his baby"
And , of course, for 18 YEARS
Keep your legs closed and it's not a problem
Rape, incest, threats to life of the mother at 30 weeks.....
It's like you purposely can't conceive of real life events that happen where a woman needs an abortion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Women need to start withholding sex from men—period. Vibrators are better anyway!
Seriously, we need to STRIKE FAST and HARD on this: SEX Ban imposed on ALL Men in Washington Starting Next Monday ( one week from the leak):
No Senator, Congressman, Legislative Aid, Staffer, Head of Communications, Lawyer, Lobbyist, Media personality,Pentagon, CIA, US Atty's Office, FBI office IS GETTING LAID
EVER Again starting NEXT Monday- until a Constitutional Amendment is passed that says, " a woman has domain over her own body and any decision she makes with it is between her and her MD and no law can be passed by Any State or Federal Body Abridging her right to control what enters , grows inside ( or not ) and leaves her own body" " Her gifts to the world are through her own labor and are therefore her own free choice and cannot be compelled"
And as for the " GOOd men" who want to Support us NO SEX for them Either until they Take the defense of US inTo High Gear
Also, Every Actress in America on TV and in Movies SHOULD Effective Next Monday REFUSE to have her sexuality exploited to make profits for Print media, film , TV, online Ads - let hairy , fat men try to sell products using only hairy fat men as Advertising.
ALL WOMEN Report to Washington for Protests: so, no Teaching in schools, no Nursing in Hospitals - You are Needed in Washington Instead
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't planned parenthood just cover the flights + hotels for women to go have abortions in blue states?
I think this could be a key effort. Setup PP clinics for women in red states, fly them first class to blue states, and put them up at the Ritz.
Y’all. No, they can’t in many states. Aiding abortion would be a crime. Do you all really think people haven’t thought of this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, raise child support payments to include full time salary while a woman is home with her " forced birth baby" for the first 18 months of life- so men pay the woman's salary plus essentials for the baby and RENT
In DC , that should be about $2,500 for rent plus $1,000 for food plus $600 month for health insurance , plus more for supplemental day care ( $1800 mos ) FOR EACh and EVERY Forced Birth= about $6,000 a month every man in DC has to pay a woman who is FORCED to have " his baby"
And , of course, for 18 YEARS
Keep your legs closed and it's not a problem
That's exactly the idea: No More Sex