Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obama and Biden weaponized our intelligence agencies to spy on political rivals. Just ask all those 501c3 groups, Sharyl Attickson, James Rosen etal...

You have it wrong friend. The intelligence agencies under Obama and Biden, as they had for the previous 70 years, were working on behalf of the American people against the bad guys. The bad guys are the ones who were conspiring with our enemies against the national interest. They were discovered because they were doing this in a way that the IC and our allies were able to monitor calls of our adversaries and discern there were Americans conspiring with them. The unmasking process is to find out who was doing the conspiring and the unmasking revealed that it was political rivals.

The original discussion around the counter-intelligence was done literally to protect Trump FROM these traitors. It was only when Trump got defensive, both in August 2016 and then later with Comey, that everyone realized that Trump was part of the problem. Everything since has been the firehose of shit to cover for the traitors, including the one in the Oval Office.

Who was found to have "conspired"?

Stone was. Flynn was. Read the documents.

Junior wanted to but was too dumb to figure out how.

Etc.

I did. There is no charge of conspiracy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obama and Biden weaponized our intelligence agencies to spy on political rivals. Just ask all those 501c3 groups, Sharyl Attickson, James Rosen etal...

You have it wrong friend. The intelligence agencies under Obama and Biden, as they had for the previous 70 years, were working on behalf of the American people against the bad guys. The bad guys are the ones who were conspiring with our enemies against the national interest. They were discovered because they were doing this in a way that the IC and our allies were able to monitor calls of our adversaries and discern there were Americans conspiring with them. The unmasking process is to find out who was doing the conspiring and the unmasking revealed that it was political rivals.

The original discussion around the counter-intelligence was done literally to protect Trump FROM these traitors. It was only when Trump got defensive, both in August 2016 and then later with Comey, that everyone realized that Trump was part of the problem. Everything since has been the firehose of shit to cover for the traitors, including the one in the Oval Office.

Who was found to have "conspired"?

Stone was. Flynn was. Read the documents.

Junior wanted to but was too dumb to figure out how.

Etc.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obama and Biden weaponized our intelligence agencies to spy on political rivals. Just ask all those 501c3 groups, Sharyl Attickson, James Rosen etal...

You have it wrong friend. The intelligence agencies under Obama and Biden, as they had for the previous 70 years, were working on behalf of the American people against the bad guys. The bad guys are the ones who were conspiring with our enemies against the national interest. They were discovered because they were doing this in a way that the IC and our allies were able to monitor calls of our adversaries and discern there were Americans conspiring with them. The unmasking process is to find out who was doing the conspiring and the unmasking revealed that it was political rivals.

The original discussion around the counter-intelligence was done literally to protect Trump FROM these traitors. It was only when Trump got defensive, both in August 2016 and then later with Comey, that everyone realized that Trump was part of the problem. Everything since has been the firehose of shit to cover for the traitors, including the one in the Oval Office.

Who was found to have "conspired"?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LOL!
This, coming from someone who, no doubt, waited breathlessly for the Mueller report to confirm the Steele dossier and prove collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign.
In due time. You will see how right those of us are who know there was misconduct, if not criminality, in the previous administration.

DP, but that was neither the charge, nor the scope of the Mueller investigation and report. If you are still making this material falsehood, then you have not read the report for yourself and are parroting the claims of others.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obama and Biden weaponized our intelligence agencies to spy on political rivals. Just ask all those 501c3 groups, Sharyl Attickson, James Rosen etal...

You have it wrong friend. The intelligence agencies under Obama and Biden, as they had for the previous 70 years, were working on behalf of the American people against the bad guys. The bad guys are the ones who were conspiring with our enemies against the national interest. They were discovered because they were doing this in a way that the IC and our allies were able to monitor calls of our adversaries and discern there were Americans conspiring with them. The unmasking process is to find out who was doing the conspiring and the unmasking revealed that it was political rivals.

The original discussion around the counter-intelligence was done literally to protect Trump FROM these traitors. It was only when Trump got defensive, both in August 2016 and then later with Comey, that everyone realized that Trump was part of the problem. Everything since has been the firehose of shit to cover for the traitors, including the one in the Oval Office.

Anonymous wrote:

LOL!
This, coming from someone who, no doubt, waited breathlessly for the Mueller report to confirm the Steele dossier and prove collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign.
In due time. You will see how right those of us are who know there was misconduct, if not criminality, in the previous administration.

Anonymous wrote:Obama and Biden weaponized our intelligence agencies to spy on political rivals. Just ask all those 501c3 groups, Sharyl Attickson, James Rosen etal...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Determined he [Flynn] wasn't being straight with the Vice President and others."

Is Reince Preibus lying in this interview from February 2017?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMWE2Hlb9ZU

I am waiting to hear what comes out in terms of what he said to the FBI and to the VP before I form an opinion on whether he lied to anybody.
At this point, I am not trusting the FBI to be truthful to the defense, the court, or the administration.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a lifelong intelligence officer, Flynn knew the tactics and illegal activities of these "17" intelligence agencies. He wanted to clean shop and the FBI got him to misrepresent a date and time that he talked to the Russian Ambassador. When he does talk to Durham (if not already), heads will roll for those in the Obama Administration who used illegal activities to further political goals.

Is this sarcasm?

As sarcastic as a Deputy Secretary of Defense on Morning Joe in 2017. She later admitted under oath to Congress that she lied... why wasn't she indicted?

Look at the GOP carrying Russia’s water for them again, just like the woman you’re smearing said you would!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/05/17/russia-is-interfering-our-elections-again-trump-supporters-are-emulating-russian-tactics/

An OpEd written by Farkas? PLEASE!!!

You’re welcome.

Listen. You’re on the side of Donald Trump. Alex Jones. Conspiracy theories and not taking responsibility. Smearing apolitical employees. No one thinks your side’s points are grounded in reality. They’re just lies.

You belong to the treason party, and for some reason you’re okay with that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a lifelong intelligence officer, Flynn knew the tactics and illegal activities of these "17" intelligence agencies. He wanted to clean shop and the FBI got him to misrepresent a date and time that he talked to the Russian Ambassador. When he does talk to Durham (if not already), heads will roll for those in the Obama Administration who used illegal activities to further political goals.

Is this sarcasm?

As sarcastic as a Deputy Secretary of Defense on Morning Joe in 2017. She later admitted under oath to Congress that she lied... why wasn't she indicted?

Look at the GOP carrying Russia’s water for them again, just like the woman you’re smearing said you would!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/05/17/russia-is-interfering-our-elections-again-trump-supporters-are-emulating-russian-tactics/

An OpEd written by Farkas? PLEASE!!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a lifelong intelligence officer, Flynn knew the tactics and illegal activities of these "17" intelligence agencies. He wanted to clean shop and the FBI got him to misrepresent a date and time that he talked to the Russian Ambassador. When he does talk to Durham (if not already), heads will roll for those in the Obama Administration who used illegal activities to further political goals.

Is this sarcasm?

As sarcastic as a Deputy Secretary of Defense on Morning Joe in 2017. She later admitted under oath to Congress that she lied... why wasn't she indicted?

Look at the GOP carrying Russia’s water for them again, just like the woman you’re smearing said you would!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/05/17/russia-is-interfering-our-elections-again-trump-supporters-are-emulating-russian-tactics/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fact: The FBI strategized about getting him to commit a crime so that they could prosecute him. Fact: They couched the interview so that it would like it was just an informal meeting. Fact: They told him he didn't need counsel.

That, in itself, should be enough for this case to be thrown out.

Fact, you are taking someone else's interpretation of the notes. The person who wrote the notes has commented on them and has said their words were being mischaracterized.

Yeah right. The strategy that was written in those notes, was indeed carried out as planned. What else could those notes have meant?

The FBI never got an explanation for Flynn's lies about the phone calls. Neither he nor KT MacFarlane remember. And the transcript for the calls haven't been released, although one person who saw them said they were very bad.

The FBI's strategy of asking Flynn about the calls wasn't successful, since he lied to them and has never told anyone the truth about them.

This statement makes no sense. The FBI strategy about the interview was carried out to a tee. They did exactly as they planned, and got the result that they wanted. They ALREADY KNEW what was in the phone calls, before the meeting.

Then, why did they need to ask him about it?

They didn't. That is the whole point. The "need to ask him about it" was a pretext for having the meeting, so they could get him to lie. If they just wanted to "ask him about it", they could have shown him the transcript and ask him to explain.

They knew what the phone calls were about. They wanted his explanation for why Pence and Spicer had it wrong.

He didn't give them any explanation, only lies.

That's not what the notes say.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fact: The FBI strategized about getting him to commit a crime so that they could prosecute him. Fact: They couched the interview so that it would like it was just an informal meeting. Fact: They told him he didn't need counsel.

That, in itself, should be enough for this case to be thrown out.

Fact, you are taking someone else's interpretation of the notes. The person who wrote the notes has commented on them and has said their words were being mischaracterized.

Yeah right. The strategy that was written in those notes, was indeed carried out as planned. What else could those notes have meant?

The FBI never got an explanation for Flynn's lies about the phone calls. Neither he nor KT MacFarlane remember. And the transcript for the calls haven't been released, although one person who saw them said they were very bad.

The FBI's strategy of asking Flynn about the calls wasn't successful, since he lied to them and has never told anyone the truth about them.

This statement makes no sense. The FBI strategy about the interview was carried out to a tee. They did exactly as they planned, and got the result that they wanted. They ALREADY KNEW what was in the phone calls, before the meeting.

Then, why did they need to ask him about it?

They didn't. That is the whole point. The "need to ask him about it" was a pretext for having the meeting, so they could get him to lie. If they just wanted to "ask him about it", they could have shown him the transcript and ask him to explain.

They knew what the phone calls were about. They wanted his explanation for why Pence and Spicer had it wrong.

He didn't give them any explanation, only lies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Determined he [Flynn] wasn't being straight with the Vice President and others."

Is Reince Preibus lying in this interview from February 2017?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMWE2Hlb9ZU

I am waiting to hear what comes out in terms of what he said to the FBI and to the VP before I form an opinion on whether he lied to anybody.
At this point, I am not trusting the FBI to be truthful to the defense, the court, or the administration.

JOHN DICKERSON: But that still leaves open the possibility that there might have been other conversations about the sanctions.

MIKE PENCE: I don’t believe there were more conversations.

JOHN DICKERSON: Okay. Okay. Okay. Let’s move on. Okay. Got it--

MIKE PENCE: I can confirm those elements were not a part of that discussion.