Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one is paying more taxes or paying for someone else’s college. The Money has already been spent. Partial forgiveness just reduces how much of it will be paid back. It’s something we do all the time for other loan programs. It isn’t taking money out of the hairdresser’s pocket or breaking the plumber’s leg. It’s probably helping someone in their family, children or spouse or siblings and plenty of other moderate income people like them.
We are paying for debt service on that loan.
Who’s we? Your share is an insignificant amount.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one is paying more taxes or paying for someone else’s college. The Money has already been spent. Partial forgiveness just reduces how much of it will be paid back. It’s something we do all the time for other loan programs. It isn’t taking money out of the hairdresser’s pocket or breaking the plumber’s leg. It’s probably helping someone in their family, children or spouse or siblings and plenty of other moderate income people like them.
We are paying for debt service on that loan.
Anonymous wrote:My plumber is an immigrant who learned plumbing through the Job Corps program and whose kids went to community college and college. I don't think he’s bothered by this. The complaints are all exaggerated and performative political rhetoric.
Anonymous wrote:No one is paying more taxes or paying for someone else’s college. The Money has already been spent. Partial forgiveness just reduces how much of it will be paid back. It’s something we do all the time for other loan programs. It isn’t taking money out of the hairdresser’s pocket or breaking the plumber’s leg. It’s probably helping someone in their family, children or spouse or siblings and plenty of other moderate income people like them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:None of these analogies make sense... Jesus with bread and fish, PPP loans, socialism, etc.
Student loan forgiveness is fine for people making below the median income, which is about $44,225 for individual Americans.
This $125k cap is crazy high... almost 3x the median income. It's disgusting.
Funny how $125 is "crazy high" now. This same board thinks $250K is barely getting by when the subject is tax increases.
Logical fallacy: red herring.
A red herring is not even a logical fallacy. So what you posted is word salad.
Incorrect--it is a type of logical fallacy (but also a literary device)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring
No, despite what you read on Wikipedia, a logical fallacy is something that can be disproven through the use of logic instead of via evidence. Clearly college debt was never a concern in your life.
Besides Wikipedia and countless other sources you can find on the internet, Purdue University begs to differ. "Fallacies are common errors in reasoning that will undermine the logic of your argument. Fallacies can be either illegitimate arguments or irrelevant points, and are often identified because they lack evidence that supports their claim."
Purdue includes red herrings in its list of logical fallacies.
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/logic_in_argumentative_writing/fallacies.html
You will note that they said “fallacies” and not “logical fallacies” despite what was on the top of the page. Note that even in your Wikipedia article they described it as an “informal fallacy”.
A logical fallacy is a type of fallacy that can be disproven with formal logic and is this “invalid” In terms of logic my statement is valid:
DCUM claims $250k income is “barely getting by”
Half of “barely getting by” is not getting by
$125k is half of $250k
Therefore people making $125k are, in the view of DCUM, not getting by.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:None of these analogies make sense... Jesus with bread and fish, PPP loans, socialism, etc.
Student loan forgiveness is fine for people making below the median income, which is about $44,225 for individual Americans.
This $125k cap is crazy high... almost 3x the median income. It's disgusting.
Funny how $125 is "crazy high" now. This same board thinks $250K is barely getting by when the subject is tax increases.
Logical fallacy: red herring.
A red herring is not even a logical fallacy. So what you posted is word salad.
Incorrect--it is a type of logical fallacy (but also a literary device)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring
No, despite what you read on Wikipedia, a logical fallacy is something that can be disproven through the use of logic instead of via evidence. Clearly college debt was never a concern in your life.
Besides Wikipedia and countless other sources you can find on the internet, Purdue University begs to differ. "Fallacies are common errors in reasoning that will undermine the logic of your argument. Fallacies can be either illegitimate arguments or irrelevant points, and are often identified because they lack evidence that supports their claim."
Purdue includes red herrings in its list of logical fallacies.
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/logic_in_argumentative_writing/fallacies.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:None of these analogies make sense... Jesus with bread and fish, PPP loans, socialism, etc.
Student loan forgiveness is fine for people making below the median income, which is about $44,225 for individual Americans.
This $125k cap is crazy high... almost 3x the median income. It's disgusting.
Funny how $125 is "crazy high" now. This same board thinks $250K is barely getting by when the subject is tax increases.
Logical fallacy: red herring.
A red herring is not even a logical fallacy. So what you posted is word salad.
You're wrong: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Red-Herring.
Glad I'm paying off your college degree where you didn't learn this...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:None of these analogies make sense... Jesus with bread and fish, PPP loans, socialism, etc.
Student loan forgiveness is fine for people making below the median income, which is about $44,225 for individual Americans.
This $125k cap is crazy high... almost 3x the median income. It's disgusting.
Funny how $125 is "crazy high" now. This same board thinks $250K is barely getting by when the subject is tax increases.
Logical fallacy: red herring.
A red herring is not even a logical fallacy. So what you posted is word salad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:None of these analogies make sense... Jesus with bread and fish, PPP loans, socialism, etc.
Student loan forgiveness is fine for people making below the median income, which is about $44,225 for individual Americans.
This $125k cap is crazy high... almost 3x the median income. It's disgusting.
Funny how $125 is "crazy high" now. This same board thinks $250K is barely getting by when the subject is tax increases.
Logical fallacy: red herring.
A red herring is not even a logical fallacy. So what you posted is word salad.
Incorrect--it is a type of logical fallacy (but also a literary device)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring
No, despite what you read on Wikipedia, a logical fallacy is something that can be disproven through the use of logic instead of via evidence. Clearly college debt was never a concern in your life.