Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like her.
Yep. Me too. She’ll be a good addition to the court.
An associate professor with 3 years in the bench? Sure, she’s *exceptional.*![]()
Did you know that CHIEF JUSTICE Roberts had even less than three years on the bench? Did you know that Justice Kagan had NO prior judicial experience? Now you do.
John Roberts was a highly accomplished lawyer who argued 39 cases before the Supreme Court. Kagan was Solicitor General.
This is absolutely no comparison between Roberts and Kagan, on one hand, and Amy, on the other. She is mediocrity at its finest. Shameful.
An associate professor whose publications have had virtually no impact in the field. No litigation experience, only 3 years on the bench. She is the least qualified nominee in modern history.
Serious question, is she less qualified on paper than Clarence Thomas? My understanding was he was only on the appeals court for a year and a half after having worked in the Reagan administration.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like her.
Yep. Me too. She’ll be a good addition to the court.
An associate professor with 3 years in the bench? Sure, she’s *exceptional.*![]()
Did you know that CHIEF JUSTICE Roberts had even less than three years on the bench? Did you know that Justice Kagan had NO prior judicial experience? Now you do.
John Roberts was a highly accomplished lawyer who argued 39 cases before the Supreme Court. Kagan was Solicitor General.
This is absolutely no comparison between Roberts and Kagan, on one hand, and Amy, on the other. She is mediocrity at its finest. Shameful.
An associate professor whose publications have had virtually no impact in the field. No litigation experience, only 3 years on the bench. She is the least qualified nominee in modern history.
Serious question, is she less qualified on paper than Clarence Thomas? My understanding was he was only on the appeals court for a year and a half after having worked in the Reagan administration.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like her.
Yep. Me too. She’ll be a good addition to the court.
An associate professor with 3 years in the bench? Sure, she’s *exceptional.*![]()
Did you know that CHIEF JUSTICE Roberts had even less than three years on the bench? Did you know that Justice Kagan had NO prior judicial experience? Now you do.
John Roberts was a highly accomplished lawyer who argued 39 cases before the Supreme Court. Kagan was Solicitor General.
This is absolutely no comparison between Roberts and Kagan, on one hand, and Amy, on the other. She is mediocrity at its finest. Shameful.
An associate professor whose publications have had virtually no impact in the field. No litigation experience, only 3 years on the bench. She is the least qualified nominee in modern history.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like her.
Yep. Me too. She’ll be a good addition to the court.
An associate professor with 3 years in the bench? Sure, she’s *exceptional.*![]()
Did you know that CHIEF JUSTICE Roberts had even less than three years on the bench? Did you know that Justice Kagan had NO prior judicial experience? Now you do.
John Roberts was a highly accomplished lawyer who argued 39 cases before the Supreme Court. Kagan was Solicitor General.
This is absolutely no comparison between Roberts and Kagan, on one hand, and Amy, on the other. She is mediocrity at its finest. Shameful.
An associate professor whose publications have had virtually no impact in the field. No litigation experience, only 3 years on the bench. She is the least qualified nominee in modern history.
But she has 7 children, will outlaw abortion and put morals back in America!!!!
Anonymous wrote:You mean impose HER morals on America.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well before I even read further, let’s just note the source:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/alternet/
LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/alternet/
Controversies
AlterNet has been given a mixed rating by Snopes.com fact checks, and was included in an initial index of "unreliable" news websites crafted by numerous media scientists and fact-checking groups.
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/alternet-media-bias
You can vilify the platform, but try reading the actual court case and you will see the headline and story are accurate.
Anonymous wrote:OK guys, stupid question, but with all the Repubs bailing on Trump to save their skins, are there any R Senators who realize how vastly unpopular this confirmation is and who will actually defy it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like her.
Yep. Me too. She’ll be a good addition to the court.
An associate professor with 3 years in the bench? Sure, she’s *exceptional.*![]()
Did you know that CHIEF JUSTICE Roberts had even less than three years on the bench? Did you know that Justice Kagan had NO prior judicial experience? Now you do.
John Roberts was a highly accomplished lawyer who argued 39 cases before the Supreme Court. Kagan was Solicitor General.
This is absolutely no comparison between Roberts and Kagan, on one hand, and Amy, on the other. She is mediocrity at its finest. Shameful.
An associate professor whose publications have had virtually no impact in the field. No litigation experience, only 3 years on the bench. She is the least qualified nominee in modern history.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like her.
Yep. Me too. She’ll be a good addition to the court.
An associate professor with 3 years in the bench? Sure, she’s *exceptional.*![]()
Did you know that CHIEF JUSTICE Roberts had even less than three years on the bench? Did you know that Justice Kagan had NO prior judicial experience? Now you do.
John Roberts was a highly accomplished lawyer who argued 39 cases before the Supreme Court. Kagan was Solicitor General.
This is absolutely no comparison between Roberts and Kagan, on one hand, and Amy, on the other. She is mediocrity at its finest. Shameful.
Anonymous wrote:
Well before I even read further, let’s just note the source:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/alternet/
LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/alternet/
Controversies
AlterNet has been given a mixed rating by Snopes.com fact checks, and was included in an initial index of "unreliable" news websites crafted by numerous media scientists and fact-checking groups.
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/alternet-media-bias