Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

So you admit, we are no better than the enemy. Innocent children be damn. Oh shucks, I already knew this administration cared naught for little girls. Epstein Island, everybody say it loud.

You’re being silly. Get serious and we can have a conversation.

OMG we just took out the leadership of the biggest stare supporter of terrorists in the world but we were supposed to do it with zero casualties. We were just supposed to ask nicely for the Ayatollah to not give nuclear suitcase bombs to Hamas and Hezbollah and they would have totes done it!!!

And this is you going full crazy and mentally slow. The Ayatollah did not have any nukes to give to Hamas and Hezbollah. You know who has provided financial and military aid to Hamas, you already know. Say it out loud. You can do it. Benjamin Netanyahu has provided such assistance to Hamas, not once but consistently over the years.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

NP - that doesn’t justify killing children. If this president wanted to attack Iran, he needed to get Congressional approval before doing so.

1. It probably does. You wouldn’t take their side risk of killing 100 kids to save 20,000+ people?

2. I agree re Congressional approval.

How did 20,000 people get saved?

How many protesters did the Iranian regime kill so far this year? How many more would have died in the months ahead?

Look, I actually am not in favor of this aggression. But we should all recognize that this is a complicated situation.

For those who are opposed bc of potential civilian cost, we have to consider the alternative.

For those concerned about US intervention (citing Iraq or Afghanistan), we need to also weigh cases where the US did NOT intervene and the result was tragic. See Syria and Rwanda.

I get that people are wound up and that many are here with predetermined agendas, but the reality is that this is a complicated issue that merits far more serious discussion than it’s receiving here.

It can be as complicated as you want it to be. The U.S. has no business overthrowing a regime in any country. Let’s mind our own business and fix our country that is in shambles currently. Stop bombing countries, killing innocent people and trying to act like a white savior when you are anything but. War is never ever the answer.

47 years of negotiating with them to no avail. Sometimes, war is the answer.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

NP - that doesn’t justify killing children. If this president wanted to attack Iran, he needed to get Congressional approval before doing so.

1. It probably does. You wouldn’t take their side risk of killing 100 kids to save 20,000+ people?

2. I agree re Congressional approval.

How did 20,000 people get saved?

How many protesters did the Iranian regime kill so far this year? How many more would have died in the months ahead?

Look, I actually am not in favor of this aggression. But we should all recognize that this is a complicated situation.

For those who are opposed bc of potential civilian cost, we have to consider the alternative.

For those concerned about US intervention (citing Iraq or Afghanistan), we need to also weigh cases where the US did NOT intervene and the result was tragic. See Syria and Rwanda.

I get that people are wound up and that many are here with predetermined agendas, but the reality is that this is a complicated issue that merits far more serious discussion than it’s receiving here.

It can be as complicated as you want it to be. The U.S. has no business overthrowing a regime in any country. Let’s mind our own business and fix our country that is in shambles currently. Stop bombing countries, killing innocent people and trying to act like a white savior when you are anything but. War is never ever the answer.

Anytime you democrats want to help fix the country and not just endlessly campaign for party power, you let us know.

We keep putting up candidates and morons keep electing Trump. Maybe get your affairs in order before making accusations.

Anonymous wrote:I am so proud to be part of an all powerful and influential nation of people! I didn’t realize the power we have until I came onto this forum and discovered that being Jewish makes me omnipotent!! Thank you for acknowledging our power. Let me know what wish you for and maybe I will grant it to you. You could always convert and then you too will be all powerful and influential. By the way, Hitler had the same feelings and beliefs that lots of people writing on this board have about Jews. Hitler did no damage at all. None . So what was it you said you wished for?

Anonymous wrote:Three tankers damaged in Gulf and one seafarer killed as US-Iran conflict escalates

http://reut.rs/4r5gJBs

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

NP - that doesn’t justify killing children. If this president wanted to attack Iran, he needed to get Congressional approval before doing so.

1. It probably does. You wouldn’t take their side risk of killing 100 kids to save 20,000+ people?

2. I agree re Congressional approval.

How did 20,000 people get saved?

How many protesters did the Iranian regime kill so far this year? How many more would have died in the months ahead?

Look, I actually am not in favor of this aggression. But we should all recognize that this is a complicated situation.

For those who are opposed bc of potential civilian cost, we have to consider the alternative.

For those concerned about US intervention (citing Iraq or Afghanistan), we need to also weigh cases where the US did NOT intervene and the result was tragic. See Syria and Rwanda.

I get that people are wound up and that many are here with predetermined agendas, but the reality is that this is a complicated issue that merits far more serious discussion than it’s receiving here.

It can be as complicated as you want it to be. The U.S. has no business overthrowing a regime in any country. Let’s mind our own business and fix our country that is in shambles currently. Stop bombing countries, killing innocent people and trying to act like a white savior when you are anything but. War is never ever the answer.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

So you admit, we are no better than the enemy. Innocent children be damn. Oh shucks, I already knew this administration cared naught for little girls. Epstein Island, everybody say it loud.

You’re being silly. Get serious and we can have a conversation.

So you can't handle the truth. Got it.

So boring. Wanna try again with something substantive?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

So you admit, we are no better than the enemy. Innocent children be damn. Oh shucks, I already knew this administration cared naught for little girls. Epstein Island, everybody say it loud.

You’re being silly. Get serious and we can have a conversation.

OMG we just took out the leadership of the biggest stare supporter of terrorists in the world but we were supposed to do it with zero casualties. We were just supposed to ask nicely for the Ayatollah to not give nuclear suitcase bombs to Hamas and Hezbollah and they would have totes done it!!!

Why are you so stupid?

Why are you reciting Putin propaganda? Are you a Russian asset Vlad?!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

NP - that doesn’t justify killing children. If this president wanted to attack Iran, he needed to get Congressional approval before doing so.

1. It probably does. You wouldn’t take their side risk of killing 100 kids to save 20,000+ people?

2. I agree re Congressional approval.

How did 20,000 people get saved?

How many protesters did the Iranian regime kill so far this year? How many more would have died in the months ahead?

Look, I actually am not in favor of this aggression. But we should all recognize that this is a complicated situation.

For those who are opposed bc of potential civilian cost, we have to consider the alternative.

For those concerned about US intervention (citing Iraq or Afghanistan), we need to also weigh cases where the US did NOT intervene and the result was tragic. See Syria and Rwanda.

I get that people are wound up and that many are here with predetermined agendas, but the reality is that this is a complicated issue that merits far more serious discussion than it’s receiving here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There is zero justification for this slaughter!

20k plus Iranians killed by the regime this year.

NP - that doesn’t justify killing children. If this president wanted to attack Iran, he needed to get Congressional approval before doing so.

1. It probably does. You wouldn’t take their side risk of killing 100 kids to save 20,000+ people?

2. I agree re Congressional approval.

How did 20,000 people get saved?

How many protesters did the Iranian regime kill so far this year? How many more would have died in the months ahead?

Look, I actually am not in favor of this aggression. But we should all recognize that this is a complicated situation.

For those who are opposed bc of potential civilian cost, we have to consider the alternative.

For those concerned about US intervention (citing Iraq or Afghanistan), we need to also weigh cases where the US did NOT intervene and the result was tragic. See Syria and Rwanda.

I get that people are wound up and that many are here with predetermined agendas, but the reality is that this is a complicated issue that merits far more serious discussion than it’s receiving here.

How many protesters have been executed in the US by ICE? How many innocent fishman have been killed by republicans. 85 girls were killed in a precision bombing of an all girls school by the Israelis or US. Israel has killed over 100,000 in Gaza plus thousands more in neighboring countries.

How many Palestinians are being held and tortured in Gestapo style prisons in Israel? How many will Israel rape, torture and kill in the next year? When will Israel annex the West Bank?

How many people are killed in death camp in North Korea? How many people have the Russian killed in Ukrainians?


Spare me your concern about the Iranian people when you and your republican brothers cheer the execution of US citizens by masked gunmen, the killing of 100,000 plus Palestinians.

If you want to make the world a better place have regime change in Israel.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:3 U.S. troops KIA.

America First amirite??

OMG! Some soldiers died killing Bin Laden too!