Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I can think of a dozen examples from my youth too, but more than luck, what prevented disaster was either

1) the men we were with were not violent or bad people
2) my friends and I looked out for each other and were protective , we paid attention to everyone’s situation and kept each other safe
3) one of us was always a designated driver, so at least one totally sober person knew what was going on

But let's take this specific case. If you went swimming alone at 4am, in treacherous waters, while drunk, do you think you'd survive? The woman had the odds stacked against her by taking such a risk, regardless of the guy she was with.

His statement is the only proof she went in the water, I believe. Otherwise, a group walked down to the beach.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Victim blaming of what she wore, how much she drank, who she went with etc are incredibly sad. Why turn a tragic event into a full blown character assassination?

Same goes for the guy, until he is convicted for anything, he is innocent as well.

Parent blaming for bringing their children to USA for TJ in Virginia. Typical Indian scam. It is why so many people want TJ shutdown.

WTAF is wrong with y'all? She came here as a toddler, not to attend TJ. By all means shut it down with department of education but someone's death isn't the right time to air your petty grievances.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It has been well documented by now that head injuries sustained by NFL players may lead to what's known as chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or CTE. The disease seems to be slow but progressive; essentially, the brain deteriorates over time. Early CTE symptoms include impulsivity, explosivity and aggression.

This guy was more likely to be volatile, esp when he chose to get trashed.

The amount is gross speculation on this thread is unhinged even by DCUM standards. You’re throwing CTE in the mix now?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm confused about the friends. They went on an excursion the next day. They did not report her missing till 4pm. Was she not going on the excursion with them? And when did they realize she was missing? Did the young man report to the friends he could't find her?

All of this has been answered in the last week dude.

There have been no formal statements released from the friends. Only speculation. Can you point to actual factual evidence about why they went on the excursion?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I can think of a dozen examples from my youth too, but more than luck, what prevented disaster was either

1) the men we were with were not violent or bad people
2) my friends and I looked out for each other and were protective , we paid attention to everyone’s situation and kept each other safe
3) one of us was always a designated driver, so at least one totally sober person knew what was going on

But let's take this specific case. If you went swimming alone at 4am, in treacherous waters, while drunk, do you think you'd survive? The woman had the odds stacked against her by taking such a risk, regardless of the guy she was with.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't reports say the POI guy was or is a lifeguard?

sure, like a lot of our 15 year olds - certified to monitor the neighborhood pool

Lifeguard to know NOT to go in the water. Especially at night.

he was drunk

The point is, he would never be able to save her no matter how many years of lifeguard training he had. Especially drunk! People are wild to think that she could have been saved.

Still don't know if she needed or wanted to be saved in water. Nor if she needed or wanted to be saved by him. If foul play?
What if:
-neither went in water
-both went in water
-he went in water, didnt notice if she went in
-he went in, she didn't go in
-she went in, he didn't
-didnt go in water and didn't see what she did
-went in water to try to help her
-went in didn't help her
-he forced her into water
-she forced him into water

Hi you poster. Yes. We’ll never know these things. No one will. We can’t blame people of things we have no evidence of just because we hate men.

Where did any portion above say anything about hating men? YOU hate men?

Troll

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm confused about the friends. They went on an excursion the next day. They did not report her missing till 4pm. Was she not going on the excursion with them? And when did they realize she was missing? Did the young man report to the friends he could't find her?

Could it be that everyone in that group assumed she was still sleeping in? Sleeping until early afternoon is not unheard of after being out all night.

Maybe they contacted her. They thought she was with the guy?

And the guy didn't think about her after waking up, or assumed she was already with friends.

Anonymous wrote:I'm confused about the friends. They went on an excursion the next day. They did not report her missing till 4pm. Was she not going on the excursion with them? And when did they realize she was missing? Did the young man report to the friends he could't find her?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm confused about the friends. They went on an excursion the next day. They did not report her missing till 4pm. Was she not going on the excursion with them? And when did they realize she was missing? Did the young man report to the friends he could't find her?

All of this has been answered in the last week dude.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't reports say the POI guy was or is a lifeguard?

sure, like a lot of our 15 year olds - certified to monitor the neighborhood pool

Lifeguard to know NOT to go in the water. Especially at night.

he was drunk

The point is, he would never be able to save her no matter how many years of lifeguard training he had. Especially drunk! People are wild to think that she could have been saved.

Still don't know if she needed or wanted to be saved in water. Nor if she needed or wanted to be saved by him. If foul play?
What if:
-neither went in water
-both went in water
-he went in water, didnt notice if she went in
-he went in, she didn't go in
-she went in, he didn't
-didnt go in water and didn't see what she did
-went in water to try to help her
-went in didn't help her
-he forced her into water
-she forced him into water

Hi you poster. Yes. We’ll never know these things. No one will. We can’t blame people of things we have no evidence of just because we hate men.

Where did any portion above say anything about hating men? YOU hate men?

Anonymous wrote:Conflicting Stories

The other major factor raising suspicion against Riibe is that during questioning, he gave three different versions of his account of what happened on 6 March.

In one version, he told police that he and Konanki went swimming and were caught in a wave. He claims that after swallowing water, he became ill and returned to his hotel room.

In his second version of the statement, Ribe stated that strong waves hit him and Konanki, and while he managed to get out, before passing out on the beach, he last saw Konanki in knee-deep water.

While in his final version, he stated that he saw Konanki walking along the beach, with the water up to her knees, heading toward a lounge chair where she had left her cover-up.

Contradicting most parts of his statement, reports suggest that surveillance footage reveals that Riibe returned to his hotel at 8:54 a.m. barefoot and shirtless. However, there has been no video evidence showing Konanki after 5:55 a.m.

Are these 3 versions necessarily inconsistent, though? In each version, he comes out of the water and eventually goes back to his hotel room, while she is still in the water when he last sees her. Would it be likely that surveillance somewhere would have shown them if they had gone somewhere together between 5:55 and 8:55 a.m.? It seems likely that there would be some witnesses walking the beach prior to 8:55 a.m. who could say whether or not he was there asleep on the beach. If he was, agree that it would be highly doubtful that he would have killed her then fallen asleep on the beach, where her friends knew she was when they last saw her.

Anonymous wrote:I'm confused about the friends. They went on an excursion the next day. They did not report her missing till 4pm. Was she not going on the excursion with them? And when did they realize she was missing? Did the young man report to the friends he could't find her?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't reports say the POI guy was or is a lifeguard?

sure, like a lot of our 15 year olds - certified to monitor the neighborhood pool

Lifeguard to know NOT to go in the water. Especially at night.

he was drunk

The point is, he would never be able to save her no matter how many years of lifeguard training he had. Especially drunk! People are wild to think that she could have been saved.

Still don't know if she needed or wanted to be saved in water. Nor if she needed or wanted to be saved by him. If foul play?
What if:
-neither went in water
-both went in water
-he went in water, didnt notice if she went in
-he went in, she didn't go in
-she went in, he didn't
-didnt go in water and didn't see what she did
-went in water to try to help her
-went in didn't help her
-he forced her into water
-she forced him into water

Hi you poster. Yes. We’ll never know these things. No one will. We can’t blame people of things we have no evidence of just because we hate men.

Anonymous wrote:I'm confused about the friends. They went on an excursion the next day. They did not report her missing till 4pm. Was she not going on the excursion with them? And when did they realize she was missing? Did the young man report to the friends he could't find her?