Anonymous wrote:Walz looks like obese Chris Farley in the “van down by the river skit”.

Anonymous wrote:Walz looks like obese Chris Farley in the “van down by the river skit”.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think kamala pissed off a lot of Jewish people and Pennsylvanians by pretending to consider shapiro when we all knew she wouldn’t dare run with a Jew due to the ongoing war in gaza. She tried to score political points with PA and Jewish people and that backfired majorly when she didn’t select him - despite having a 60% approval rating in a must win state - precisely bc he’s Jewish.

And I’m disgusted by the party’s fringe reaction to her potentially selecting a Jew- looking at you, the Cynthia Nixons and the Rashida tlaibs of the party. Crying on social media that it would be a death sentence for the party to nominate Shapiro, who has called Netanyahu Israel’s worst leader of all time and is probably less pro Israel than walz - IS antisemitic. Kamala gave into a disgusting part of the dem fringe by forgoing Shapiro. I have no issues with walz, but in my opinion he’s not an asset to the campaign, sort of how Hilary picked Tim Kaine who wouldn’t overshadow her.

If Trump wasn’t the Republican nominee I’m not sure I’d vote for Kamala after this.

Ok. Thanks for that anecdote

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I live in SEC country (getting the Georgia TV commercials from both campaigns).

Walz is seen as open border, sanctuary city far left radical.

+1

Democrats can explode with happiness and joy that Walz “looks normal” and pretend his folksy shtick will play with SEC fans. Hint: It won’t. People will see the things Walz has done in MN and run away from him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What shouldn’t be lost in today’s news cycle is that the governor of a crucial swing state was humiliated by being skipped over for this nomination. And why? Because the anti-Israel activists in the party would have gone even more crazy due to Shapiro’s presence on the ticket. So don’t be at all surprised when the late night Philly magic doesn’t happen on election night.

This was exactly my reaction to this news. How you all are celebrating the anti-semitism of the far left that this choice has given its stamp of approval for is beyond me. This is not a "unifying" choice, unless your version of the Democratic party expunges a whole lot of Jews. PA is going to go to Trump.

Anonymous wrote:I think kamala pissed off a lot of Jewish people and Pennsylvanians by pretending to consider shapiro when we all knew she wouldn’t dare run with a Jew due to the ongoing war in gaza. She tried to score political points with PA and Jewish people and that backfired majorly when she didn’t select him - despite having a 60% approval rating in a must win state - precisely bc he’s Jewish.

And I’m disgusted by the party’s fringe reaction to her potentially selecting a Jew- looking at you, the Cynthia Nixons and the Rashida tlaibs of the party. Crying on social media that it would be a death sentence for the party to nominate Shapiro, who has called Netanyahu Israel’s worst leader of all time and is probably less pro Israel than walz - IS antisemitic. Kamala gave into a disgusting part of the dem fringe by forgoing Shapiro. I have no issues with walz, but in my opinion he’s not an asset to the campaign, sort of how Hilary picked Tim Kaine who wouldn’t overshadow her.

If Trump wasn’t the Republican nominee I’m not sure I’d vote for Kamala after this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a democrat and I find the whole "weird" line of attack to be pretty weird itself. What are we advocating for here? A society of conformists? Sounds fascist to me.

The point is to pivot from the "end of democracy" that inadvertently made Trump look more powerful when the fact is he's a weak, clownish and yes, weird guy who should be made fun of far more. Ridicule also has the benefit of being more effective vs. fascism/authoritarianism.

So fight fascism with fascism? Or adopting Trump's tactics, making fun of others? Sorry I just don't think it's a winning line of attack.

The majority of Americans disagree with you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I live in SEC country (getting the Georgia TV commercials from both campaigns).

Walz is seen as open border, sanctuary city far left radical.

That can't be true since nobody heard of him until yesterday.

+1. The right wing trolls are such desperate dorks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz looks like obese Chris Farley in the “van down by the river skit”.

The left has been negging Trump for his weight but think Walz is charming.

Anonymous wrote:I live in SEC country (getting the Georgia TV commercials from both campaigns).

Walz is seen as open border, sanctuary city far left radical.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

One person’s socialism is another person’s neighborliness.

So if you’re against socialism, then you support ending social security and Medicare, right?

DP
I’m fine with them. Pretty sure they’ve been around for longer than I have, and we are not a socialist country.
But good try.

Pp here. I support them as well. But they are “socialist” policies. I’m tired of people saying how much they hate “socialism” when they clearly support a lot of “socialist” policies.

The interstate highway system is also socialist, as is the US Postal system, the military, the FAA and a host of other "government services"

Exactly! That’s my point. We have many “socialist” programs. They are good for our economy and our people. Which is why people who criticize Walz (and others) for being a “socialist”need to stop and think about what policies they are objecting to. My guess is that the folks who are so angry about “socialist” politicians are happy to collect their disability checks and complain loudly about potholes not being fixed.

Move to Venezuela- they love socialism

DP. These are the countries that have some form of universal health care, which MAGA considers to be "socialist." Most of our closest allies are in that list. And as far as Venezuela goes, it's more of a kleptocracy than anything else.

Australia
Austria
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
Chile
Cuba
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Luxembourg
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Portugal
Singapore
South Korea
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
United Kingdom

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a democrat and I find the whole "weird" line of attack to be pretty weird itself. What are we advocating for here? A society of conformists? Sounds fascist to me.

The point is to pivot from the "end of democracy" that inadvertently made Trump look more powerful when the fact is he's a weak, clownish and yes, weird guy who should be made fun of far more. Ridicule also has the benefit of being more effective vs. fascism/authoritarianism.

So fight fascism with fascism? Or adopting Trump's tactics, making fun of others? Sorry I just don't think it's a winning line of attack.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz looks like obese Chris Farley in the “van down by the river skit”.

The left has been negging Trump for his weight but think Walz is charming.