Anonymous wrote:Charles was hamstrung by tradition. He was supposed to marry a virgin blue blood. He would have married Camilla and lived happily ever after if he had not been the heir. He and Diana were a complete mismatch and made each other miserable. Divorce was inevitable.

Lmao. He did not love Camilla, she was just a convenient and easy f**k. What exactly have you read abou their backstory? Charles was generally unfaithful, he had dozens of girls. Camilla became Chief Mistress because she was convenient. Her house was nearby the Wales house. She was married, so we wouldn't make too many demands of Charles (mistresses mustn't be demanding, they must be soothers of your insecurities). She was plain/not very cute, so she wouldn't outshine Charles. (Many biographers, including Andrew Morton, have noted that Charles actually resented Diana's beauty and hated that she got more cheers and camera flashes than he did.)

And he would've ended the affair many times, if not for Camilla clutching him like a drowning squirrel. The Queen was said to have been angry that Camilla didn't leave Charles alone to repair his marriage.

That he married Camilla in the end has nothing to do with "love", but again soothing his bruised ego. She enabled his narcissism from the start, and he probably resented the public scandal about their affair. So finally he's like, "Well f**k it, I'll need a wife once I'm king, and I'm insecure and lonely, and people already ripped me a new one for having an affair with Camilla. So I'll marry her and then I can give my critics the finger. Hah! We won!"

So romantic. Much roses. Wow.

Charles was hamstrung by tradition. He was supposed to marry a virgin blue blood. He would have married Camilla and lived happily ever after if he had not been the heir. He and Diana were a complete mismatch and made each other miserable. Divorce was inevitable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

She was groomed at the age of 13 to become Charles's wife. She really didn't have a choice in the matter and had a young, fairy-girl fantasy. It was a different time and you cannot compare a 19-year old of the 1982 with a 2023, 19-year old, more less her idolization of Charles at 13 in the 1970's. Her family did her wrong.

She was not groomed at 13 to become charles's wife any more than any other 13 year old was. What nonsense. You must have her confused with Queen Elizabeth, who met her future husband at 13. If you compare 19 year olds then and now, 19 year olds then were treated like women ready to be with a man and 19 year olds today are treated like children, who have to be shielded from men.

Every girl on the planet wants to marry a prince. Imagine if her family had talked her out of it, how pissed she'd be. She'd be in a bar drunk at 11 am saying, "I could have married a prince you know. But no, my family talked me out of it." Then she'd turn to the person on her other side and say, "I could have married a prince, you know, but..." while the bar tender, airpods in his ears, wipes the bar with a rag.

Lol

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

She was groomed at the age of 13 to become Charles's wife. She really didn't have a choice in the matter and had a young, fairy-girl fantasy. It was a different time and you cannot compare a 19-year old of the 1982 with a 2023, 19-year old, more less her idolization of Charles at 13 in the 1970's. Her family did her wrong.

Diana and I are the same age and both introverts. I was able to make decisions about my work, whom I wanted to date and marry without needing my family's approval. You infantilize women with your attitudes. She willingly accepted his proposal and married him. She remained in the marriage long enough to have two sons and divorce him. She was stronger than you give her credit for.

She also thought Charles loved her when she said yes.

She could have divorced him earlier. She chose to stay in a loveless marriage longer than many of her contemporaries. She had her reasons and made her decision, which was her perogative as an adult.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

Yes but likely pressured by her family to seize the golden opportunity.

Imagine the advice you would get here as a mother if you wanted wanted to discourage or stop a 19 year old daughter from dating or marrying the wrong guy. You can't stop that train once it's left the station. The mother would be told unequivocally to butt out. Diana made her bed.

If Diana wanted to be Queen, she would have stayed married. The reason I respect her is that she chose to live the life that was right for her, and walked away from the monarchy. Unlike her son and wife, who chose their lives but didn't walk away -- instead choosing to do Netflix specials and sell books trashing their family.

Isn’t Charles the one who asked for the divorce?

Queen Elizabeth told them to divorce.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

Yes but likely pressured by her family to seize the golden opportunity.

Imagine the advice you would get here as a mother if you wanted wanted to discourage or stop a 19 year old daughter from dating or marrying the wrong guy. You can't stop that train once it's left the station. The mother would be told unequivocally to butt out. Diana made her bed.

If Diana wanted to be Queen, she would have stayed married. The reason I respect her is that she chose to live the life that was right for her, and walked away from the monarchy. Unlike her son and wife, who chose their lives but didn't walk away -- instead choosing to do Netflix specials and sell books trashing their family.

Isn’t Charles the one who asked for the divorce?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

She was groomed at the age of 13 to become Charles's wife. She really didn't have a choice in the matter and had a young, fairy-girl fantasy. It was a different time and you cannot compare a 19-year old of the 1982 with a 2023, 19-year old, more less her idolization of Charles at 13 in the 1970's. Her family did her wrong.

She was not groomed at 13 to become charles's wife any more than any other 13 year old was. What nonsense. You must have her confused with Queen Elizabeth, who met her future husband at 13. If you compare 19 year olds then and now, 19 year olds then were treated like women ready to be with a man and 19 year olds today are treated like children, who have to be shielded from men.

Every girl on the planet wants to marry a prince. Imagine if her family had talked her out of it, how pissed she'd be. She'd be in a bar drunk at 11 am saying, "I could have married a prince you know. But no, my family talked me out of it." Then she'd turn to the person on her other side and say, "I could have married a prince, you know, but..." while the bar tender, airpods in his ears, wipes the bar with a rag.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

She was groomed at the age of 13 to become Charles's wife. She really didn't have a choice in the matter and had a young, fairy-girl fantasy. It was a different time and you cannot compare a 19-year old of the 1982 with a 2023, 19-year old, more less her idolization of Charles at 13 in the 1970's. Her family did her wrong.

Diana and I are the same age and both introverts. I was able to make decisions about my work, whom I wanted to date and marry without needing my family's approval. You infantilize women with your attitudes. She willingly accepted his proposal and married him. She remained in the marriage long enough to have two sons and divorce him. She was stronger than you give her credit for.

She also thought Charles loved her when she said yes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

She was groomed at the age of 13 to become Charles's wife. She really didn't have a choice in the matter and had a young, fairy-girl fantasy. It was a different time and you cannot compare a 19-year old of the 1982 with a 2023, 19-year old, more less her idolization of Charles at 13 in the 1970's. Her family did her wrong.

Diana and I are the same age and both introverts. I was able to make decisions about my work, whom I wanted to date and marry without needing my family's approval. You infantilize women with your attitudes. She willingly accepted his proposal and married him. She remained in the marriage long enough to have two sons and divorce him. She was stronger than you give her credit for.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

Yes but likely pressured by her family to seize the golden opportunity.

Imagine the advice you would get here as a mother if you wanted wanted to discourage or stop a 19 year old daughter from dating or marrying the wrong guy. You can't stop that train once it's left the station. The mother would be told unequivocally to butt out. Diana made her bed.

If Diana wanted to be Queen, she would have stayed married. The reason I respect her is that she chose to live the life that was right for her, and walked away from the monarchy. Unlike her son and wife, who chose their lives but didn't walk away -- instead choosing to do Netflix specials and sell books trashing their family.

Diana did sell her story and did interviews. Showed Harry how to be strong.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/royals/king-charles-wants-prince-harry-back-family-coronation-source/

Hope this is true and they can make amends.

Sounds like Charles' motivation is selfish and transactional. The rift with Harry makes him look bad and vies for more positive attention to his coronation.

Dp Either way to you whatever Charles does is "wrong" Invite them or not you would always blame him.

I'm not a knee-jerk Charles hater. This is my first post.

Anonymous wrote:Diana would have been the British Jackie Onassis if she was alive--married or dating uberwealthy, exciting men while running her charities and living a fabulous life with her children. Wearing a seatbelt seems like such a small, unimportant hassle when you are dodging the paparazzi but it was this lapse in judgment that was responsible for her death and that of Dodi Fayed and their driver.

Diana wasn't dating those guys before she died so I don't know why you would think there was going to be some fairy tale ending to a life that was anything but a fairy tale.

Diana would have been the British Jackie Onassis if she was alive--married or dating uberwealthy, exciting men while running her charities and living a fabulous life with her children. Wearing a seatbelt seems like such a small, unimportant hassle when you are dodging the paparazzi but it was this lapse in judgment that was responsible for her death and that of Dodi Fayed and their driver.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://people.com/royals/king-charles-wants-prince-harry-back-family-coronation-source/

Hope this is true and they can make amends.

Sounds like Charles' motivation is selfish and transactional. The rift with Harry makes him look bad and vies for more positive attention to his coronation.

Dp Either way to you whatever Charles does is "wrong" Invite them or not you would always blame him.

Remember when Charles asked Harry to vacate the lease on Frogmore cottage so that his pedo brother could move in? Seems like a great father/son dynamic

So? Like it or not Prince Andrew has not been convicted and for him, the Frogmore cottage was a big step down.

But you hate Charles so you are very biased.

Sure, the non-sweater who loves to party with teens is still being taken care of by the family

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she had just bothered to wear a seatbelt, she would be living an amazing life with Dodi (or the like), her sons, and grandchildren.

Wasn't he a coke head? So I don't think it would have ended happily. If the paps hadn't chased her and her driver not been drunk...see too many what ifs...

She would have definitely lived if she put on her seatbelt. The only survivor, her bodyguard, wore his seatbelt.