Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

Not the topic. And totally irrelevant to whether she was allowed to get an abortion in Ohio. Which she was not.

It’s very relevant, but, I understand, inconvenient for you

DP children should not be sexually abused.

But when that does happen they need to have access to abortion if they become pregnant. Because babies should not be gestating babies.

The forced birthers want the baby to be born. Honestly, they believe the 10 year old is at fault. She was asking for it. It’s part of her punishment for being a slutty 10 year old.
It’s what they believe.

The rapist is at fault, as is the mother who covered for him

Yes, we know.

Okay, we agree on that. Now, what do you do about the baby who is pregnant and can't get an abortion in her state because of draconian laws? Something has to be done fast because pregnancies aren't stagnant and can't be put on pause.

And crickets from the forced birthers.

Do you realize how many answers to your response have been deleted so far?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

Not the topic. And totally irrelevant to whether she was allowed to get an abortion in Ohio. Which she was not.

It’s very relevant, but, I understand, inconvenient for you

DP children should not be sexually abused.

But when that does happen they need to have access to abortion if they become pregnant. Because babies should not be gestating babies.

The forced birthers want the baby to be born. Honestly, they believe the 10 year old is at fault. She was asking for it. It’s part of her punishment for being a slutty 10 year old.
It’s what they believe.

The rapist is at fault, as is the mother who covered for him

Yes, we know.

Okay, we agree on that. Now, what do you do about the baby who is pregnant and can't get an abortion in her state because of draconian laws? Something has to be done fast because pregnancies aren't stagnant and can't be put on pause.

And crickets from the forced birthers.

Do you realize how many answers to your response have been deleted so far?

The answer is a private matter and the forced birthers can just stay out of it as they should. The voters will take care of ensuring that this is the legal answer on election day.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

Not the topic. And totally irrelevant to whether she was allowed to get an abortion in Ohio. Which she was not.

It’s very relevant, but, I understand, inconvenient for you

DP children should not be sexually abused.

But when that does happen they need to have access to abortion if they become pregnant. Because babies should not be gestating babies.

The forced birthers want the baby to be born. Honestly, they believe the 10 year old is at fault. She was asking for it. It’s part of her punishment for being a slutty 10 year old.
It’s what they believe.

The rapist is at fault, as is the mother who covered for him

Yes, we know.

Okay, we agree on that. Now, what do you do about the baby who is pregnant and can't get an abortion in her state because of draconian laws? Something has to be done fast because pregnancies aren't stagnant and can't be put on pause.

And crickets from the forced birthers.

Do you realize how many answers to your response have been deleted so far?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

Not the topic. And totally irrelevant to whether she was allowed to get an abortion in Ohio. Which she was not.

It’s very relevant, but, I understand, inconvenient for you

DP children should not be sexually abused.

But when that does happen they need to have access to abortion if they become pregnant. Because babies should not be gestating babies.

The forced birthers want the baby to be born. Honestly, they believe the 10 year old is at fault. She was asking for it. It’s part of her punishment for being a slutty 10 year old.
It’s what they believe.

The rapist is at fault, as is the mother who covered for him

Yes, we know.

Okay, we agree on that. Now, what do you do about the baby who is pregnant and can't get an abortion in her state because of draconian laws? Something has to be done fast because pregnancies aren't stagnant and can't be put on pause.

And crickets from the forced birthers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Public reprimand? That's it?
No apology to the doctor required? No setting the record straight?
Indiana is a state I plan to avoid forever.

She should sue the AG personally.

Anonymous wrote:Public reprimand? That's it?
No apology to the doctor required? No setting the record straight?
Indiana is a state I plan to avoid forever.

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone wonder how many little girls have been forced to give birth since the activists judges overturned Roe?

Anonymous wrote:Indiana Attorney General Rokita receives a public reprimand from the Indiana Supreme Court because of his conduct in the matter.

Respondent Theodore Rokita is, and at relevant times was, the Attorney General of Indiana. On July 13, 2022, Respondent appeared on a national television program to discuss an Indiana physician who had performed an abortion on a ten-year-old rape victim from Ohio. During that appearance Respondent described the physician as an “abortion activist acting as a doctor—with a history of failing to report.” Respondent admits, and we find, that he engaged in attorney misconduct by making this statement.
...
The Court concludes that [Rokita] violated Indiana Professional Conduct Rules 3.6(a) and 4.4(a) by making an extrajudicial statement that had a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding and had no substantial purpose other than to embarrass or burden the physician. For [Rokita]’s professional misconduct, he is hereby publicly reprimanded.

Two of the five Indiana Justices believe that a harsher punishment was warranted due to his status as the Attorney General and the scope and breadth of his misconduct.

https://public.courts.in.gov/Decisions/api/Document/Opinion?Id=9KDDHss6z73sddUdIVCzo4eqM9PfqIzsdkrr6v2WIiT5ZbS-zYlxkQetH5WIVMSP0

Respondent Theodore Rokita is, and at relevant times was, the Attorney General of Indiana. On July 13, 2022, Respondent appeared on a national television program to discuss an Indiana physician who had performed an abortion on a ten-year-old rape victim from Ohio. During that appearance Respondent described the physician as an “abortion activist acting as a doctor—with a history of failing to report.” Respondent admits, and we find, that he engaged in attorney misconduct by making this statement.
...
The Court concludes that [Rokita] violated Indiana Professional Conduct Rules 3.6(a) and 4.4(a) by making an extrajudicial statement that had a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding and had no substantial purpose other than to embarrass or burden the physician. For [Rokita]’s professional misconduct, he is hereby publicly reprimanded.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

Not the topic. And totally irrelevant to whether she was allowed to get an abortion in Ohio. Which she was not.

It’s very relevant, but, I understand, inconvenient for you

DP children should not be sexually abused.

But when that does happen they need to have access to abortion if they become pregnant. Because babies should not be gestating babies.

The forced birthers want the baby to be born. Honestly, they believe the 10 year old is at fault. She was asking for it. It’s part of her punishment for being a slutty 10 year old.
It’s what they believe.

The rapist is at fault, as is the mother who covered for him

Yes, we know.

Okay, we agree on that. Now, what do you do about the baby who is pregnant and can't get an abortion in her state because of draconian laws? Something has to be done fast because pregnancies aren't stagnant and can't be put on pause.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

Not the topic. And totally irrelevant to whether she was allowed to get an abortion in Ohio. Which she was not.

It’s very relevant, but, I understand, inconvenient for you

DP children should not be sexually abused.

But when that does happen they need to have access to abortion if they become pregnant. Because babies should not be gestating babies.

The forced birthers want the baby to be born. Honestly, they believe the 10 year old is at fault. She was asking for it. It’s part of her punishment for being a slutty 10 year old.
It’s what they believe.

The rapist is at fault, as is the mother who covered for him

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

And, why does that mean she has to have the rapists baby again?

She doesn’t. The hospital refused to do an abortion.

Because of draconian laws that do not spell out that a pregnant child is always an exception to the ban and can receive an abortion legally without threat of prosecution.

If you are more worried about prosecution than doing the right moral thing, that’s a character flaw.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually the republican politicians said the victim didn’t exist. They screamed for a weekend on Fox News that it was fake news.
And just left it at that.

Democrats hid the identity of the mother until it became clear that the danger was coming from inside the house

Doxxing the mother would dox the identity of the 10 year old victim.

Who needs to be protected from the mother since the rapist was her boyfriend.

Not the topic. And totally irrelevant to whether she was allowed to get an abortion in Ohio. Which she was not.

It’s very relevant, but, I understand, inconvenient for you

DP children should not be sexually abused.

But when that does happen they need to have access to abortion if they become pregnant. Because babies should not be gestating babies.

The forced birthers want the baby to be born. Honestly, they believe the 10 year old is at fault. She was asking for it. It’s part of her punishment for being a slutty 10 year old.
It’s what they believe.

The rapist is at fault, as is the mother who covered for him