Anonymous wrote:What I'm curious to know: Were those visiting South African players that H used in NITQ registered with USA field hockey? If not, that was so wrong--taking a spot in Nationals away from some other team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
If you mean 1 coach engaged in a coup to get half the team to go with them, then yes, this is correct. She was at NIT doing the same thing. Looking to pull more players away.
As someone who witnessed this first hand, this statement is flat out wrong. There was no "coup." A confluence of factors came together for the exodus to happen. Many families were unhappy with the club's leadership and culture and were looking for a change. When a very well-liked and dynamic coach and club administrator moved to Maryland and decided to join up with Wolves, several of the families (which included kids at multiple age levels) decided to follow. This led to others, particularly in younger age groups where many were recruited into the club by the departed coach, to decide to stay with their friends and coaches and switch clubs. The transition to the new club has been very positive for most, if not all, involved and word has started to get out. The field hockey world is very small and, like it or not, people are always looking around (too much in my opinion). If people are unhappy with a club, they will talk to other programs. If you build a culture that people appreciate and gravitate towards, you don't have to "pull more players away," they come to you.
Anonymous wrote:
If you mean 1 coach engaged in a coup to get half the team to go with them, then yes, this is correct. She was at NIT doing the same thing. Looking to pull more players away.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anybody know what happened with Hustle. We need more club teams in the DMV, not less.
It doesn’t really matter at this point and we may never know the real reason. Even what the players were told may not be the truth. All those girls will find a new club or some will move on to a new sport.
I don’t necessarily think we need more clubs, but more practice space and coaches could help the existing clubs
I think in the end, Hustle just lost too many players. The exodus spanned June-November (maybe even later). Players following coaches, friends/carpools, school teammates, etc. Other clubs are also better with helping players get recruited.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anybody know what happened with Hustle. We need more club teams in the DMV, not less.
It doesn’t really matter at this point and we may never know the real reason. Even what the players were told may not be the truth. All those girls will find a new club or some will move on to a new sport.
I don’t necessarily think we need more clubs, but more practice space and coaches could help the existing clubs
Anonymous wrote:If you prioritize development and not selections, Nexus is a pretty good value. 18 hours of training over three weekends with competitive kids and sound instruction for roughly $600.00.
Anonymous wrote:Anybody know what happened with Hustle. We need more club teams in the DMV, not less.
Anonymous wrote:Anybody know what happened with Hustle. We need more club teams in the DMV, not less.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you expand on this? How do the club coaches get to select?
Completely agree with this, USA field hockey has a Nexus problem and allowing club coaches to select for their national tournaments etc is a disservice to all athletes.