Anonymous wrote:I just looked at her Instagram page and feel bad for her, especially the close-up photos of her face. You can see in her eyes something is not right. I feel for Sam Asghari, I hope he can find her the help she needs.
Anonymous wrote:But I don’t understand why she cant just have a mental illness? Why does she need a conservatorship for decades? How many other famous people have mental illness but are still allowed to live? How many other regular people have mental illness without a conservatorship? She’s acting wacko but is she more wacko than, say, Madonna? Also, I think most actors and actresses have some sort of mental illness and/or low self esteem going on. She’s not hurting anyone. Let her twirl away and spend all her money. What’s the big deal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But I don’t understand why she cant just have a mental illness? Why does she need a conservatorship for decades? How many other famous people have mental illness but are still allowed to live? How many other regular people have mental illness without a conservatorship? She’s acting wacko but is she more wacko than, say, Madonna? Also, I think most actors and actresses have some sort of mental illness and/or low self esteem going on. She’s not hurting anyone. Let her twirl away and spend all her money. What’s the big deal?
Exactly. 40% of Americans will have a mental illness at some point in their lifetime. This is about power and control over a talented woman, and nothing more.
Anonymous wrote:But I don’t understand why she cant just have a mental illness? Why does she need a conservatorship for decades? How many other famous people have mental illness but are still allowed to live? How many other regular people have mental illness without a conservatorship? She’s acting wacko but is she more wacko than, say, Madonna? Also, I think most actors and actresses have some sort of mental illness and/or low self esteem going on. She’s not hurting anyone. Let her twirl away and spend all her money. What’s the big deal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She was posting nude/nearly nude photos before the conservatorship ended. This is not about empowerment or reclaiming her body, it’s mental illness on full display with no one to protect her now.
Do you think everyone who poses nude is mentally ill?
Show us another healthy 40 year old with teenaged sons who alternates between posts of twirling around or posing nude with a vacant or dazed expression. #SaveBritney will be the social media campaign by mid-2022.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is posting yourself nude considered empowering? I will never ever understand that
Me either.
Because she's reclaiming her body that others have profited from and exploited since childhood.
By displaying it to everyone else?
NP. By her own choice. She can do it.
The reality is that she is an adult abuse survivor whose body was exploited by the people who should have protected her. She is finally able to make her own choices. Do I think it is great for her to pose nude? No. But I would literally support her if she walked nude down Central Park, because it is how she is reclaiming a terrible history.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She was posting nude/nearly nude photos before the conservatorship ended. This is not about empowerment or reclaiming her body, it’s mental illness on full display with no one to protect her now.
Do you think everyone who poses nude is mentally ill?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She was posting nude/nearly nude photos before the conservatorship ended. This is not about empowerment or reclaiming her body, it’s mental illness on full display with no one to protect her now.
Do you think everyone who poses nude is mentally ill?