Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There are emails to back Durham’s statements up

Durham’s statement is stupid. The FBI knew he worked for the DNC.

The text message he revealed in Monday's filing said this to General Counsel for the FBI James Baker:

"Jim—it’s Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and sensitive) I need to discuss. Do you have availability for a short meeting tomorrow? I’m coming on my own—not on behalf of a client or company—want to help the Bureau. Thanks."

This text was sent the day before he told Baker about "purported data and 'white papers' that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel" between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which has ties to the Kremlin.

[b]So, he claimed to be representing himself. A lie.

The bolded is the crux of the issue.

Is a personal text message subject to those laws? Doubtful.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There are emails to back Durham’s statements up

Durham’s statement is stupid. The FBI knew he worked for the DNC.

The text message he revealed in Monday's filing said this to General Counsel for the FBI James Baker:

"Jim—it’s Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and sensitive) I need to discuss. Do you have availability for a short meeting tomorrow? I’m coming on my own—not on behalf of a client or company—want to help the Bureau. Thanks."

This text was sent the day before he told Baker about "purported data and 'white papers' that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel" between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which has ties to the Kremlin.

[b]So, he claimed to be representing himself. A lie.

The bolded is the crux of the issue.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There are emails to back Durham’s statements up

Durham’s statement is stupid. The FBI knew he worked for the DNC.

The text message he revealed in Monday's filing said this to General Counsel for the FBI James Baker:

"Jim—it’s Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and sensitive) I need to discuss. Do you have availability for a short meeting tomorrow? I’m coming on my own—not on behalf of a client or company—want to help the Bureau. Thanks."

This text was sent the day before he told Baker about "purported data and 'white papers' that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel" between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which has ties to the Kremlin.

So, he claimed to be representing himself. A lie.

I love how Durham is trying his hardest to burn down what is left of the FBI. These high-profile "lying to the FBI" crimes are a good deterrent for anyone to speak to the FBI. And this case is a great deterrent for anyone considering giving a tip to the FBI. (Most tipsters have an ulterior motive. That's expected, goes with the territory. It's not a crime, or at least, it didn't used to be.)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There are emails to back Durham’s statements up

Durham’s statement is stupid. The FBI knew he worked for the DNC.

Anonymous wrote:

There are emails to back Durham’s statements up

Yeah, he still hasn't gotten past the biggest hurdle. Because he can't.

Durhan is a sad joke now. He just looks ridiculous.

Oh well.

Anonymous wrote:Guess who is investigating the DNC server... <grabbing the popcorn>

At this point, you must be 500 lbs from eating so much popcorn.

Guess who is investigating the DNC server... <grabbing the popcorn>

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Drip drip drip

I’m hearing more indictments by summer

You’ve been saying “just a few more weeks” for over a year now. No one takes this seriously anymore.

Progress has been made over that time. I’m not worried.

What progress? You sound like a total Qronut.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's not flipping witnesses and nothing is coming of this. It is a waste of time and money that won't produce anything meaningful.

Some very specific information suggests otherwise.

You can’t tell us what that specific information is, but you swear it proves your point. 😆

Time my friends, Time. Summer’s coming

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's not flipping witnesses and nothing is coming of this. It is a waste of time and money that won't produce anything meaningful.

Some very specific information suggests otherwise.

You can’t tell us what that specific information is, but you swear it proves your point. 😆

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's not flipping witnesses and nothing is coming of this. It is a waste of time and money that won't produce anything meaningful.

Some very specific information suggests otherwise.

Specific and secret information. Very specific and very secret.