Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reports I have heard have said that Volker's "interview" absolutely destroys the Pelosi/Schiff narrative.

We will see when the transcripts of the interview are released.

And, in other news....... The White House has refused to produce any documents they have requested until Pelosi takes a vote so the process can be defined.
Nancy will be getting a letter outlining this tomorrow.
Check.

Please link the reports, because people are posting first hand accounts here that are pretty damaging.

First hand? You mean staffers from the Hill are posting here? Members of congress?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Wall Street Journal exclusive:
Trump ordered the removal of the ambassador to Ukraine after months of complaints from allies, including Rudy Giuliani, that she was undermining him abroad and obstructing efforts to persuade Kyiv to investigate Biden.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-ordered-ukraine-ambassador-removed-after-complaints-from-giuliani-others-11570137147?redirect=amp#click=https://t.co/2yoTb1G7Ow

WSJ, huh? Ouch. That’s gotta hurt.

Intersting. I heard she didn't support the newly elected president of Ukraine.

Anonymous wrote:Reports I have heard have said that Volker's "interview" absolutely destroys the Pelosi/Schiff narrative.

We will see when the transcripts of the interview are released.

And, in other news....... The White House has refused to produce any documents they have requested until Pelosi takes a vote so the process can be defined.
Nancy will be getting a letter outlining this tomorrow.
Check.

Please link the reports, because people are posting first hand accounts here that are pretty damaging.

Reports I have heard have said that Volker's "interview" absolutely destroys the Pelosi/Schiff narrative.

We will see when the transcripts of the interview are released.

And, in other news....... The White House has refused to produce any documents they have requested until Pelosi takes a vote so the process can be defined.
Nancy will be getting a letter outlining this tomorrow.
Check.

Lifting^^

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also

The former U.S. special envoy for Ukraine told House investigators on Thursday that he warned President Trump’s personal attorney, Rudolph W. Giuliani, that Giuliani was receiving untrustworthy information from Ukrainian political figures about former vice president Joe Biden and his son, according to two people familiar with his testimony

WaPo

So basically, the State Department told Giuliani this was fake stuff and he continued to push it and now we have the president and vice president pushing it on the American public, and 30% have bought it, and it will be used as a pretext to give Ukraine to Russia.

And putin is the clear winner.

Way to go, GOP.

Listing sanctions has always been the goal.

Anonymous wrote: Wall Street Journal exclusive:
Trump ordered the removal of the ambassador to Ukraine after months of complaints from allies, including Rudy Giuliani, that she was undermining him abroad and obstructing efforts to persuade Kyiv to investigate Biden.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-ordered-ukraine-ambassador-removed-after-complaints-from-giuliani-others-11570137147?redirect=amp#click=https://t.co/2yoTb1G7Ow

WSJ, huh? Ouch. That’s gotta hurt.

Does anyone here have any theories as to why Nick Mulvaney hasn't been issued a subpoena yet?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And Pelosi responds:

It's cute how Republicans continue to wildly underestimate Nancy Pelosi.

She’s awesome. Best regards - cracked me up

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Wall Street Journal exclusive:
Trump ordered the removal of the ambassador to Ukraine after months of complaints from allies, including Rudy Giuliani, that she was undermining him abroad and obstructing efforts to persuade Kyiv to investigate Biden.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-ordered-ukraine-ambassador-removed-after-complaints-from-giuliani-others-11570137147?redirect=amp#click=https://t.co/2yoTb1G7Ow

Move along, nothing to see here.

No joke!


thoughts and prayers!

no, wait...

no proof of collusion!

no, that's not it...

no big deal!

GOP bingo!

Anonymous wrote: Wall Street Journal exclusive:
Trump ordered the removal of the ambassador to Ukraine after months of complaints from allies, including Rudy Giuliani, that she was undermining him abroad and obstructing efforts to persuade Kyiv to investigate Biden.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-ordered-ukraine-ambassador-removed-after-complaints-from-giuliani-others-11570137147?redirect=amp#click=https://t.co/2yoTb1G7Ow

Move along, nothing to see here.

Wall Street Journal exclusive:
Trump ordered the removal of the ambassador to Ukraine after months of complaints from allies, including Rudy Giuliani, that she was undermining him abroad and obstructing efforts to persuade Kyiv to investigate Biden.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-ordered-ukraine-ambassador-removed-after-complaints-from-giuliani-others-11570137147?redirect=amp#click=https://t.co/2yoTb1G7Ow

Anonymous wrote:And Pelosi responds:

It's cute how Republicans continue to wildly underestimate Nancy Pelosi.

I'd say Volker's testimony is pretty damaging to Trump...

"The former US special envoy for Ukraine told House investigators that he urged Ukraine’s leadership not to interfere in US politics in a conversation that followed a phone call between President Trump and Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky, according to two sources familiar with the testimony.

Volker’s testimony seems to confirm the whistleblower description in the complaint that Volker and another US diplomat “provided advice to the Ukrainian leadership about how to ‘navigate’ the demands that the president made.”

He also told lawmakers that the Ukrainian government had a lot of questions why the military aid was being held up and he did not have a good explanation, according to the sources describing the testimony." Manu Raju and Jeremy Herb

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/gop-minority-calls-for-delay-on-trump-impeachment-until-pelosi-agrees-to-give-white-house-more-control-over-process/

And Pelosi responds: