Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not so fast. GC & BI were tied 5-5 at half.
This isn’t true. It was 7-5 GC at half.
so it would make you feel better at 16-1 over the last two quarters…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://laxnumbers.com/team_info.php?y=2024&t=21069
ranked 1st - but look at their schedule - no CT teams, no mcdonogh...
Anonymous wrote:https://laxnumbers.com/team_info.php?y=2024&t=21069
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not so fast. GC & BI were tied 5-5 at half.
This isn’t true. It was 7-5 GC at half.
Anonymous wrote:Not so fast. GC & BI were tied 5-5 at half.
Anonymous wrote:Not so fast. GC & BI were tied 5-5 at half.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GC over BI 23-6.
Is the BI part of the score missing a "1" next to the "6".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Latest from Vegas:
STAB -1.5 vs GV
SR -13.5 vs HC
SSSA -12.5 at HAS
GC -7.5 vs BI
All favorites cover
STAB -1.5
SR-13.5
SSSAS -12.5
GC -7.5