[quote=Anonymous]Anyone think Bondi will continue hollering that DJT is “the greatest President in American history”?[/quote]

She will because she is terrified of what will happen to her if she deviates from the program. She knows he had Epstein silenced and she knows about the murder of the adolescent girls he raped.

Apparently donald didn't know this was happening.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Oh goodness, does she really think she can convince us considering her correspondence with Maxwell? And all the Eastern European girls Epstein had procured for years? Nothing is by "chance" with these people.

I have to think that she was advised that this was going to raise more questions than answers.

She clearly didn’t write it. It’s not clear she knows what “trivial” means—she certainly can’t pronounce it.

I think she said "trifle"

She is so weird.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Oh goodness, does she really think she can convince us considering her correspondence with Maxwell? And all the Eastern European girls Epstein had procured for years? Nothing is by "chance" with these people.

I have to think that she was advised that this was going to raise more questions than answers.

She clearly didn’t write it. It’s not clear she knows what “trivial” means—she certainly can’t pronounce it.

Anonymous wrote:Any theories on why she did this?

1. Bondi plans to tell some truths in revenge
2. Bill gates is testifying, may have info? Melanie was the one who trafficked girls to him?
3. Someone else is to testify that we haven’t heard about that has dirt on her?
4. Andrew or Fergie plan to squeal?

She called for hearing with the survivors.
That would be under oath and it would be interesting to see if they name names.

I read that with a subpoena that NDAs don't count. i'm not a legal expert, though.


But, I don't think she would do this without approval from Trump. This could backfire on Khanna and Massie.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She sued Carville?

That would be a bad idea. It opens her up to discovery.

She was threatening to sue Michael Wolff for $1B for saying that Epstein introduced her to Trump so Wolff is now suing her, therefore opening that up to discovery is already a done deal.

Anonymous wrote:Any theories on why she did this?

Something pretty awful is about to drop and she’s trying to get ahead of it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have we reached the point where Iran is going so badly they've decided to engage with the Epstein files as a distraction?

It seems possible

A distraction from the distraction.

Anonymous wrote:Have we reached the point where Iran is going so badly they've decided to engage with the Epstein files as a distraction?

It seems possible

Any theories on why she did this?

Have we reached the point where Iran is going so badly they've decided to engage with the Epstein files as a distraction?

This is so weird.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clearly something big is about to drop....

https://bsky.app/profile/acyn.bsky.social/post/3mj3hcbkqye2g

The lies linking me with Jeffrey Epstein need to end today. I've never been friends with Epstein. I never had a relationship with Epstein or his accomplice, Maxwell. My email reply to Maxwell cannot be categorized as anything more than casual correspondence.

Wow Melania commenting on anything is really unusual. Did she take questions?

No, she did not take questions.