Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her Staff must hate her. Why else would they not stop this PR disaster for her.

I don't think its a message to the kids. It really doesn't make sense to take a surprise visit that you don't give a s*&^ about.

It was clearly a message to Trump. Her statement was pretty close to the other first ladies, she may not be a saint (or hell, even a good person) but she didn't like this policy. And she has been giving him little FUs through her clothing for months. They are not happily marries (obvi).

No offense, but I think this is giving her way too much credit.

She wore a jacket that says, "I don't really care. Do U". You think NO ONE pointed that out to her? Or someone pointed it out and she was like, 'shhh peasant, this is fashion!'

There are widespread reports of her openly weeping on election night. She made a statement earlier this week that perhaps didn't openly criticize Trump but certainly broke with the party line. And she's a model who has used fashion to make statements since she has been first lady.

She might be a gold digging model from slovenia but I think you're giving her too little credit. You don't go on a walk to AF1 (especially after the heels incident in houston which they DEFINITELY listened to because she wasn't wearing them in subsequent shots) in a jacket that says that during this week unless you have something to say. And I really can't think of a rationale behind it being towards the incarcerated families and children considering the purpose of the trip.

So you think it's a secret message to DJT? I just don't get what the message to him could be, secret or not. Totes agree that she seems to care about the kids, but I don't get the meaning of the jacket.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her Staff must hate her. Why else would they not stop this PR disaster for her.

I don't think its a message to the kids. It really doesn't make sense to take a surprise visit that you don't give a s*&^ about.

It was clearly a message to Trump. Her statement was pretty close to the other first ladies, she may not be a saint (or hell, even a good person) but she didn't like this policy. And she has been giving him little FUs through her clothing for months. They are not happily marries (obvi).

No offense, but I think this is giving her way too much credit.

She wore a jacket that says, "I don't really care. Do U". You think NO ONE pointed that out to her? Or someone pointed it out and she was like, 'shhh peasant, this is fashion!'

There are widespread reports of her openly weeping on election night. She made a statement earlier this week that perhaps didn't openly criticize Trump but certainly broke with the party line. And she's a model who has used fashion to make statements since she has been first lady.

She might be a gold digging model from slovenia but I think you're giving her too little credit. You don't go on a walk to AF1 (especially after the heels incident in houston which they DEFINITELY listened to because she wasn't wearing them in subsequent shots) in a jacket that says that during this week unless you have something to say. And I really can't think of a rationale behind it being towards the incarcerated families and children considering the purpose of the trip.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her Staff must hate her. Why else would they not stop this PR disaster for her.

I don't think its a message to the kids. It really doesn't make sense to take a surprise visit that you don't give a s*&^ about.

It was clearly a message to Trump. Her statement was pretty close to the other first ladies, she may not be a saint (or hell, even a good person) but she didn't like this policy. And she has been giving him little FUs through her clothing for months. They are not happily marries (obvi).

No offense, but I think this is giving her way too much credit.

Anonymous wrote:All publicity is good publicity.

Trum ps ratings continue to climb .

Anonymous wrote:Her Staff must hate her. Why else would they not stop this PR disaster for her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her Staff must hate her. Why else would they not stop this PR disaster for her.

I don't think its a message to the kids. It really doesn't make sense to take a surprise visit that you don't give a s*&^ about.

It was clearly a message to Trump. Her statement was pretty close to the other first ladies, she may not be a saint (or hell, even a good person) but she didn't like this policy. And she has been giving him little FUs through her clothing for months. They are not happily marries (obvi).

Anonymous wrote:Her Staff must hate her. Why else would they not stop this PR disaster for her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That can't be real. Melania wouldn't wear a cheap jacket. She is usually fashionable. Remember her Hurricane Harvey skinny jeans and stilettos? I am not a Trumper in any way, shape or form, btw.

It's real. Here's more:

https://twitter.com/meridithmcgraw/status/1009868675829129216

"NEW: @FLOTUS spokeswoman Stephanie Grisham when asked what message the first lady's jacket intends to send: "It's a jacket. There was no hidden message. After today's important visit to Texas, I hope this isn't what the media is going to choose to focus on.""

Like, but, for real - WTF was she thinking? That high heels in the Houston floods wasn't really enough of a f*ck you - this time she'd try to be more explicit?

At least it doesn't say "Womp Womp"!!

Anonymous wrote:All publicity is good publicity.

Trum ps ratings continue to climb .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:How are we supposed to interpret this:

That can't be real. Melania wouldn't wear a cheap jacket. She is usually fashionable. Remember her Hurricane Harvey skinny jeans and stilettos? I am not a Trumper in any way, shape or form, btw.

She isn't dead and she's wearing the jacket. She wore it to send a message fom her husband and her true feeling.