Anonymous wrote:
The aspect of complicity in terms of the teens who were drinking themselves and made the decision not to wear their seat belts would come into play with regard to the disposition of the case of the teen driving the car.
However, the case of the adult parents - especially the one or both if there who was in the house at the time of the party - is what needs to be focused on in a wider sense of the community. From the testimony of the teens present, the Dad had visual knowledge of liquor coming in and also personal one-on-one conversation with at least one teen about the beer. He should be held accountable in a court of law. Also there should be a different "magnitude of sanction" if hosting an underage drinking party results in the loss of life for any adult in a household. Since the girl hosting the party was in her parents home, I would focus less on her and more on them in terms of criminal negligence. This is the only way to try and get more of a sense of accountability in the wider community - threat of prosecution.
I can only imagine the pressures being put on the Montgomery County police in this case, and I do commend them for doing their due diligence. Now let's see how the local district attorney's office follows through.....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree that the driver and party host(s) should face significant punishment. However, shouldn't there be at least SOME acknowledgement of the complicity of the other boys in the car? They too had been drinking, they didn't wear seat belts, I guarantee that they were on board with the fast driving (there was a comment about someone telling the driver that he could avoid a speed camera by going fast), and I believe they were 18 except for the one boy in the passenger seat, and at least one of the boys other than the driver had a history with the police as well - it could just as easily have been one of them who was driving after drinking. I see no evidence that they were anything other than right there on board with what the driver was doing that night leading up to the accident.
Of course this is a tragedy, but to make the driver out as a terrible person compared to the victims and the many, many other teens out there who engage in similar behavior seems disingenuous.
You put my thoughts into words much better than I did. That's the problem I have with the Murks' press release.
Anonymous wrote:I agree that the driver and party host(s) should face significant punishment. However, shouldn't there be at least SOME acknowledgement of the complicity of the other boys in the car? They too had been drinking, they didn't wear seat belts, I guarantee that they were on board with the fast driving (there was a comment about someone telling the driver that he could avoid a speed camera by going fast), and I believe they were 18 except for the one boy in the passenger seat, and at least one of the boys other than the driver had a history with the police as well - it could just as easily have been one of them who was driving after drinking. I see no evidence that they were anything other than right there on board with what the driver was doing that night leading up to the accident.
Of course this is a tragedy, but to make the driver out as a terrible person compared to the victims and the many, many other teens out there who engage in similar behavior seems disingenuous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.wusa9.com/story/news/local/potomac/2015/09/21/family-n-potomac-crash-victim-releases-statement/72583840/
I'm not sure how I feel with this statement. I agree with most of it, especially that the host parent should be held criminally responsible. However, their child wasn't doing right either. It feels like they are blaming everyone else, without admitting that their son was drinking underage.
When I know my kid is going to a house with the parents home, I do not expect underage alcohol. Do you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.wusa9.com/story/news/local/potomac/2015/09/21/family-n-potomac-crash-victim-releases-statement/72583840/
I'm not sure how I feel with this statement. I agree with most of it, especially that the host parent should be held criminally responsible. However, their child wasn't doing right either. It feels like they are blaming everyone else, without admitting that their son was drinking underage.
When I know my kid is going to a house with the parents home, I do not expect underage alcohol. Do you?
Not "expect" but at that age, I question what that are doing. Absolutely. Do you have teens?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.wusa9.com/story/news/local/potomac/2015/09/21/family-n-potomac-crash-victim-releases-statement/72583840/
I'm not sure how I feel with this statement. I agree with most of it, especially that the host parent should be held criminally responsible. However, their child wasn't doing right either. It feels like they are blaming everyone else, without admitting that their son was drinking underage.
When I know my kid is going to a house with the parents home, I do not expect underage alcohol. Do you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.wusa9.com/story/news/local/potomac/2015/09/21/family-n-potomac-crash-victim-releases-statement/72583840/
I'm not sure how I feel with this statement. I agree with most of it, especially that the host parent should be held criminally responsible. However, their child wasn't doing right either. It feels like they are blaming everyone else, without admitting that their son was drinking underage.
Anonymous wrote:http://www.wusa9.com/story/news/local/potomac/2015/09/21/family-n-potomac-crash-victim-releases-statement/72583840/
Anonymous wrote:Between the hosting adult parent and the 18 yr old driver, it doesn't seem right that one pays a minor fine and one goes to jail.
Anonymous wrote:Wasn't the host girl an 18 yr old classmate?