Anonymous wrote:Game was ugly. BSC sent Pipeline girl out on a stretcher. Concern for spinal injury. And then BSC coaches made a big stink about getting additional minutes of “stoppage” time added to the game.

Injuries happen and we are all relieved the player is okay.

The behavior by the BSC coaches needs to be addressed somehow. It was disgusting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How do you take parts from three strong teams (Bethesda, Union, Brave) and end up here?

Bad coaching from a group of narcissists.

Or you don't admit is that the player's SES is what got them "recruited" and not what club they played for.

Anonymous wrote:How do you take parts from three strong teams (Bethesda, Union, Brave) and end up here?

Bad coaching from a group of narcissists.

Anonymous wrote:Game was ugly. BSC sent Pipeline girl out on a stretcher. Concern for spinal injury. And then BSC coaches made a big stink about getting additional minutes of “stoppage” time added to the game.

I have no skin in the game, my kids are nowhere near this age group, but... The two things are not mutually exclusive - a girl being hurt is very unfortunate and depending on circumstance should be addressed by the refs (was it an unavoidable accident, on purpose, sloppy play, etc?). The injury does not void the "stoppage" issue.

How do you take parts from three strong teams (Bethesda, Union, Brave) and end up here?

Game was ugly. BSC sent Pipeline girl out on a stretcher. Concern for spinal injury. And then BSC coaches made a big stink about getting additional minutes of “stoppage” time added to the game.

Wow fraud alert for real!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pipeline pwned BSC 10s today.

What is happening NM?

Fraud Alert!

One win 2010 pipeline beat bethesda? That cant be right.

It's so odd that someone would blatantly lie about something so easily fact checked. What would the purpose of that be?

score is not in the system yet

1-1

Oof.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pipeline pwned BSC 10s today.

What is happening NM?

Fraud Alert!

One win 2010 pipeline beat bethesda? That cant be right.

It's so odd that someone would blatantly lie about something so easily fact checked. What would the purpose of that be?

score is not in the system yet

1-1

tied is not pwned

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pipeline pwned BSC 10s today.

What is happening NM?

Fraud Alert!

One win 2010 pipeline beat bethesda? That cant be right.

It's so odd that someone would blatantly lie about something so easily fact checked. What would the purpose of that be?

score is not in the system yet

1-1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pipeline pwned BSC 10s today.

What is happening NM?

Fraud Alert!

One win 2010 pipeline beat bethesda? That cant be right.

It's so odd that someone would blatantly lie about something so easily fact checked. What would the purpose of that be?

score is not in the system yet

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pipeline pwned BSC 10s today.

What is happening NM?

Fraud Alert!

One win 2010 pipeline beat bethesda? That cant be right.

It's so odd that someone would blatantly lie about something so easily fact checked. What would the purpose of that be?

Anonymous wrote:Pipeline pwned BSC 10s today.

What is happening NM?

Fraud Alert!

One win 2010 pipeline beat bethesda? That cant be right.

Pipeline pwned BSC 10s today.

What is happening NM?

Fraud Alert!

Recruiting wise the record really doesn't even matter as long as they go .500