Anonymous wrote:Coleman doesn't have many years left at SR. She is a Mother first and foremost and about to have another child (her 4th I believe). Please leave her be.

I do think most people on here who throw mud at her are simply jealous of her success.

She has put SR on the lacrosse map. If you don't like the intensity she brings, there are plenty of other options in the DMV to consider.

Her 5th. All working moms are mother’s first and foremost, but need to be prepared and act professional at work. This post doesn’t hold water. Intensity and being out of control are not the same thing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NCS has a good coach, they will get better but the ceiling at a school like NCS is not nearly as high as a the ceiling is at a school like SJC, VISI or SR.

Its just a fact.

Fact is NCS is a better academic school. The others are not even comparable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NCS has a good coach, they will get better but the ceiling at a school like NCS is not nearly as high as a the ceiling is at a school like SJC, VISI or SR.

Its just a fact.

Fact is NCS is a better academic school. The others are not even comparable.

Anonymous wrote:NCS has a good coach, they will get better but the ceiling at a school like NCS is not nearly as high as a the ceiling is at a school like SJC, VISI or SR.

Its just a fact.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SSSAS over Holton 15-4

ISL AA. As one who like to see disruption and upsets, I think we have enough information to say that this is not the year that Holy Child or Holton break into the top 4 in the ISL. Could Holy Child compete with Potomac toward the end of the season if they improve? Maybe, but I don't see any other possible wins for the "next two".

And for the Bullis booster, they appear to be slightly improved, but are not going to beat any of those 6 teams.

As for the the ISL A level, some speculated that Sidwell might step up. Then they lost to St. Mary's Ryken. Only remaining potential interesting development I see, is whether NCS can compete. They simply haven't played much lacrosse yet, but should be ready to take the ISL A on paper. If they handle Sidwell tomorrow, then the Holton Arms game next week might be worth watching.

How was this match up?

Holton by 4 (13-9), but you probably knew that. Notable that top tier of ISL A (NCS and Sidwell) are closer to Holton (within 4 goals), than Holton is to the top of the ISL AA (6-11 goals). Seems likely that NCS and Sidwell appear to be as good or better than Bullis and Episcopal. Maybe a Premier league style relegation/promotion would make sense.

Yes Holton by four, but that’s not the whole story. At half it was 8-3 and Holton played a man down for the entire second half. The player who was benched also is Holton’s top player. While just a scrimmage at the beginning of the year, Holton played Sidwell and handled them easily. NCS has a lot of great young talent that will be fun to watch grow over the next few years, and I am confident they will be better and stronger.

There’s a need for a middle division. Maybe. AAA, AA, A. And there should be a shot clock in lower divisions. It does the A teams a disservice to not be playing with one because once they move up to AA they don’t have the style of play needed when using a shot clock.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Potomac started out ahead. SR was aggressive and went on a run. SR got a bunch of yellow cards including one for their coach who apparently wakes up everyday and eats a bowl of bit*hy for breakfast. Potomac came back. The game was tied. 3 overtimes. Could have gone either way. Both teams are good.

SR would have kept a comfortable lead if the coach was sane. Never have I seen a coach frequently put their team at a disadvantage like that coach. She Somehow can’t figure out it’s not about her.

Why are these parents allowing this to happen week in and week out? Where is the SR administration?

We put up with it because she is a great leader. Demonstrates all the right core values for our girls, and she beats your daughter's team more often than not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Potomac started out ahead. SR was aggressive and went on a run. SR got a bunch of yellow cards including one for their coach who apparently wakes up everyday and eats a bowl of bit*hy for breakfast. Potomac came back. The game was tied. 3 overtimes. Could have gone either way. Both teams are good.

SR would have kept a comfortable lead if the coach was sane. Never have I seen a coach frequently put their team at a disadvantage like that coach. She Somehow can’t figure out it’s not about her.

Why are these parents allowing this to happen week in and week out? Where is the SR administration?

We put up with it because she is a great leader. Demonstrates all the right core values for our girls, and she beats your daughter's team more often than not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Potomac started out ahead. SR was aggressive and went on a run. SR got a bunch of yellow cards including one for their coach who apparently wakes up everyday and eats a bowl of bit*hy for breakfast. Potomac came back. The game was tied. 3 overtimes. Could have gone either way. Both teams are good.

SR would have kept a comfortable lead if the coach was sane. Never have I seen a coach frequently put their team at a disadvantage like that coach. She Somehow can’t figure out it’s not about her.

Why are these parents allowing this to happen week in and week out? Where is the SR administration?

Anonymous wrote:Who won SJC vs Loyola Academy game?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Potomac started out ahead. SR was aggressive and went on a run. SR got a bunch of yellow cards including one for their coach who apparently wakes up everyday and eats a bowl of bit*hy for breakfast. Potomac came back. The game was tied. 3 overtimes. Could have gone either way. Both teams are good.

SR would have kept a comfortable lead if the coach was sane. Never have I seen a coach frequently put their team at a disadvantage like that coach. She Somehow can’t figure out it’s not about her.

Why are these parents allowing this to happen week in and week out? Where is the SR administration?

But she wiiiiiinnnnsss

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SSSAS over Holton 15-4

ISL AA. As one who like to see disruption and upsets, I think we have enough information to say that this is not the year that Holy Child or Holton break into the top 4 in the ISL. Could Holy Child compete with Potomac toward the end of the season if they improve? Maybe, but I don't see any other possible wins for the "next two".

And for the Bullis booster, they appear to be slightly improved, but are not going to beat any of those 6 teams.

As for the the ISL A level, some speculated that Sidwell might step up. Then they lost to St. Mary's Ryken. Only remaining potential interesting development I see, is whether NCS can compete. They simply haven't played much lacrosse yet, but should be ready to take the ISL A on paper. If they handle Sidwell tomorrow, then the Holton Arms game next week might be worth watching.

How was this match up?

Holton by 4 (13-9), but you probably knew that. Notable that top tier of ISL A (NCS and Sidwell) are closer to Holton (within 4 goals), than Holton is to the top of the ISL AA (6-11 goals). Seems likely that NCS and Sidwell appear to be as good or better than Bullis and Episcopal. Maybe a Premier league style relegation/promotion would make sense.