Anonymous wrote:Obvious she was employed and living on her own so could've said no.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.
Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?
Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.
Harry and William were right. He shouldn’t have married her.
Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.
Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?
Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.
Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?
Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.
A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.
Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.
Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?
Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.
Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.
Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?
Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.
Anonymous wrote:Most people doesn't like Camilla because she is the other woman and not 1/8th as charming as Diana.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Should be Queen Diana.
With all due respect to Diana, she’s been dead for 25 years and even if she hadn’t died in the car accident she wouldn’t be Queen because she and Charles were divorced.
We will never know what could have happened if Camilla wasn’t in the picture.
Like if she wasn’t born? Come on, Charles and Diana weren’t in love with each other, it was an arranged marriage. They each deserved better and it’s tragic that Diana didn’t get her chance to grow old with someone she loved and loved her for her. Camilla certainly earned people’s distaste for her, but it seems pretty obvious that she and Charles are the loves of each other’s lives.
Anonymous wrote:Should be Queen Diana.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Should be Queen Diana.
With all due respect to Diana, she’s been dead for 25 years and even if she hadn’t died in the car accident she wouldn’t be Queen because she and Charles were divorced.
We will never know what could have happened if Camilla wasn’t in the picture.
I think it’s obvious that she and Charles were quite mismatched. If it hadn’t been Camilla, it would have been something or someone else (for both of them). I am a Diana fan but can admit she suffered from mental illness as a result of an unstable childhood, which would have made a stable marriage with Charles, or anyone, impossible.
Anonymous wrote:Should be Queen Diana.