Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
As much evidence as possible, of course. I'm a research scientist. I need to know![]()
Me too, fellow research scientist. But I gather information, data, evidence for a living so I don’t need to be provided with anything concrete. Raise the suspicion and I will investigate myself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:None. Hey f you’re not my closest friend, keep your mouth shut. I cannot imagine getting some note or whatever when I’m due with a baby from some loser who has nothing better to do. So thanks for blowing up my life which you are not even a part of. F you if you are thinking about doing this.
If your spouse was cheating he's the one that would have blown up your life. Don't blame the mailman!
Faulty thinking along with deflection.
But there is no evidence, beyond circumstantial, that the husband is cheating. OP is concocting it. So the life would not be blown up due to an actual cheating husband.
There is not even circumstantial evidence. An inkling is not "evidence" of anything. My guess is that OP is jealous of the attention the other woman gets at work.
My guess is your a cheating husband or an AP and you are worried OP is talking about you.
Or you or just stupid can't think of any other reasons that would lead you to come to such a dumbass conclusion.
Anonymous wrote:
As much evidence as possible, of course. I'm a research scientist. I need to know![]()
Anonymous wrote:OP if they are cheating they are doing it somewhere. Her home if she's not married?
Do a little PI work on your own.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:None. Hey f you’re not my closest friend, keep your mouth shut. I cannot imagine getting some note or whatever when I’m due with a baby from some loser who has nothing better to do. So thanks for blowing up my life which you are not even a part of. F you if you are thinking about doing this.
If your spouse was cheating he's the one that would have blown up your life. Don't blame the mailman!
Faulty thinking along with deflection.
But there is no evidence, beyond circumstantial, that the husband is cheating. OP is concocting it. So the life would not be blown up due to an actual cheating husband.
There is not even circumstantial evidence. An inkling is not "evidence" of anything. My guess is that OP is jealous of the attention the other woman gets at work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Usually, one failed Rice Krispy test will do it.
The Google did not help ... can you explain?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:None. Hey f you’re not my closest friend, keep your mouth shut. I cannot imagine getting some note or whatever when I’m due with a baby from some loser who has nothing better to do. So thanks for blowing up my life which you are not even a part of. F you if you are thinking about doing this.
If your spouse was cheating he's the one that would have blown up your life. Don't blame the mailman!
Faulty thinking along with deflection.
But there is no evidence, beyond circumstantial, that the husband is cheating. OP is concocting it. So the life would not be blown up due to an actual cheating husband.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:None. Hey f you’re not my closest friend, keep your mouth shut. I cannot imagine getting some note or whatever when I’m due with a baby from some loser who has nothing better to do. So thanks for blowing up my life which you are not even a part of. F you if you are thinking about doing this.
If your spouse was cheating he's the one that would have blown up your life. Don't blame the mailman!
Faulty thinking along with deflection.
Anonymous wrote:None. Hey f you’re not my closest friend, keep your mouth shut. I cannot imagine getting some note or whatever when I’m due with a baby from some loser who has nothing better to do. So thanks for blowing up my life which you are not even a part of. F you if you are thinking about doing this.
Anonymous wrote:Usually, one failed Rice Krispy test will do it.