Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The text messages seem to imply it was a consensual relationship.

What does that have to do with anything? Sex with a minor is illegal. Sex with a student is gross.

She was 18 and they never had "sex" per Bill Clinton's definition.

Just means the laws were created to protect men. We need to change the laws. 4 years ago the 17 year old rape victim (there were 2 so far) wouldn’t even been able to have him arrested “according to the law”.

Where exact is the rape charge?

Sex in the 1st degree with a student is rape no matter their age. Sex with a 17 year old is rape. Even oral or digit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is it even legit for teachers to text students? It should be officially prohibited. Every communication strictly through the school email.

+1.

Happens all the time. DS in HS has a female coach and receives texts.

Individual texts or texts to the entire team?

Principals need to train staff better and write them up when they breach this rule. It is not allowed in MCPS to text students. It should be documented when it happens.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is it even legit for teachers to text students? It should be officially prohibited. Every communication strictly through the school email.

+1.

Happens all the time. DS in HS has a female coach and receives texts.

Anonymous wrote:Why is it even legit for teachers to text students? It should be officially prohibited. Every communication strictly through the school email.

+1.

Anonymous wrote:The text messages seem to imply it was a consensual relationship.

.

It is not consensual when it is your teacher, even when you are 18. The teacher is in a position of authority over the student. It is per se illegal for a teacher to sleep with a student - “consent” isn’t a defense (although I am sure Shipley’s lawyer will try fo assert that).

It is also not consensual when it is your coach. Your coach is like your boss - he is someone who holds power over your opportunities and achievements. The crew coach decides whether you will row, what position you will row, whether you are in 1st or second boat, go to special regattas, etc. All of these opportunities can make a difference in college opportunities and scholarships. Many of us have been in this position as adults - when a boss hits on us. It is impossible to deal with - we face reputational loss, career loss, loss of personal and professional relationships. It is no different with that girl and she likely felt she had even fewer protections than any one of us have in the office.

The 17 year old believed she was in a real relationship, I’m sure. It went on for several years. I still wouldn’t call that consensual when a much older guy meets you in a mandatory attendance environment and uses that to flatter and get intimate with you and leads you to believe he has your best interests at heart.

Anonymous wrote:Does MCPS release the number or percent of teachers who are put on administrative leave for a report of this nature, or for sexting or grooming or whatever, and then are returned to their position, or placed in the same position in another school? That statistic would be interesting.

LOL.

Not a chance. MCPS prefers to sweep things like this under the rug.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The text messages seem to imply it was a consensual relationship.

What does that have to do with anything? Sex with a minor is illegal. Sex with a student is gross.

She was not a minor at the time of the relationship though still a student. And yes from the text messages it seems consensual. Wonder what happened that caused her to file charges against him

One of the victims was a minor.

Why is it even legit for teachers to text students? It should be officially prohibited. Every communication strictly through the school email.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The text messages seem to imply it was a consensual relationship.

What does that have to do with anything? Sex with a minor is illegal. Sex with a student is gross.

She was not a minor at the time of the relationship though still a student. And yes from the text messages it seems consensual. Wonder what happened that caused her to file charges against him

It was not a consensual relationship and for you to assume as such is disgusting. She was his student and his athlete, which is a relationship that can easily be manipulated when you and your family have put so much trust into someone to look after you. It’s disgusting that he took advantage of that. It doesn’t matter how long it’s been since it happened, women can come forward when they’re ready.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The text messages seem to imply it was a consensual relationship.

What does that have to do with anything? Sex with a minor is illegal. Sex with a student is gross.

She was 18 and they never had "sex" per Bill Clinton's definition.

Just means the laws were created to protect men. We need to change the laws. 4 years ago the 17 year old rape victim (there were 2 so far) wouldn’t even been able to have him arrested “according to the law”.

Where exact is the rape charge?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The text messages seem to imply it was a consensual relationship.

What does that have to do with anything? Sex with a minor is illegal. Sex with a student is gross.

She was not a minor at the time of the relationship though still a student. And yes from the text messages it seems consensual. Wonder what happened that caused her to file charges against him

Does MCPS release the number or percent of teachers who are put on administrative leave for a report of this nature, or for sexting or grooming or whatever, and then are returned to their position, or placed in the same position in another school? That statistic would be interesting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The text messages seem to imply it was a consensual relationship.

What does that have to do with anything? Sex with a minor is illegal. Sex with a student is gross.

She was 18 and they never had "sex" per Bill Clinton's definition.

Just means the laws were created to protect men. We need to change the laws. 4 years ago the 17 year old rape victim (there were 2 so far) wouldn’t even been able to have him arrested “according to the law”.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What the school needs to do now and going forward is to hire an external investigator to investigate and identify other teachers who groom students, those who make inappropriate comments, and those who behave inappropriately in front of the students.

The school has a passive attitude of waiting to see if there are reports as opposed to preventing sexual abuse, assault, and harassment. The school should take it more seriously since these students are minors.

Grooming is not illegal.

You missed the arrest of MCPS Richard Shemer.

Sexting is not grooming.

Also he will teach again.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/wjla.com/amp/news/local/convicted-teacher-taken-off-md-sex-offender-registry-could-possibly-teach-again