Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought last night wasn't even about CRT?!

So are the policies she didn't agree with CRT related or transgender related?

Her statement that I saw was all about CRT and the training she is getting, yet this thread assumes otherwise.

The trainings do tell teachers exactly what she said. And we can interpret that as we do. Everyone interprets it differently.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought last night wasn't even about CRT?!

So are the policies she didn't agree with CRT related or transgender related?

Her statement that I saw was all about CRT and the training she is getting, yet this thread assumes otherwise.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have kids in LCPS and am anti-CRT (the radical bits), but this strikes me as grandstanding.

Oh, does CRT give you too much cognitive dissonance? Poor thing.

Do you actually believe it’s being taught in elementary school? It isn’t. If you think it is, you are as gullible as the rest of them.

This idiot woman quit over her hatred of trans people, in any case. Ironic since Jesus would side with the trans kids.

You're a hateful POS, and your types will lead to the replacement of these garbage leftist school boards.

It would be better if CRT were taught in high school than what we're getting now, which is a bunch of low-brow, race-obsessed administrators thinking they can apply (not teach) CRT in elementary, middle, and high schools.

Anonymous wrote:This woman is a total POS who doesn’t GAF about any of the students.

If she legit had concerns she would have quit long ago. Now the school will need to scramble to find a last-minute replacement.

Way to F over the students.

Anonymous wrote:I don't really understand this. The voters of this county elected these people. I imagine they would be re-elected overwhelmingly. It's a very blue county now and will remain so.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good riddance. We don’t need people like her at Byron Cross interacting with our children.

I wonder if she also attends Cornerstone Chapel. They seem to be the common denominator in all of this. Not very Christian.

Yes, I was about to comment on the other thread that this smacks of CC. This was obviously a very emotional and difficult decision for her, but what is sad to me is she truly believes she is persecuted, when she is the one who has been indoctrinated.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^ and Byron Cross.

I do feel sad that this woman is so gullible as to ruin her career and humiliate herself nationally like this as part of this. She has been manipulated like so many else.

But I am also glad she won’t be teaching children anymore. Let her work at Walmart or something.

She's hot enough that she'll probably end up on Fox News, which I bet was in the back of her mind

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since CRT is a graduate school level academic subject, no elementary schooler is studying it.

That snark is stale and it won't hunt. Most sentient people reasonably understand that what's being discussed is not CRT as it is taught in-law schools and in higher education, but rather, aspects derived from its principles.

Could you please elaborate on exactly what those aspects are?

Thanks.

Not the pp, but broadly stated, segregation is one aspect derived from its principles.
https://www.blackenterprise.com/atlanta-school-principal-under-fire-for-racially-segregated-classrooms/

Uh no. CRT would examine the racial impetus behind SYSTEMS of segregation in our country (eg redlining) and the legal ramifications and outcomes . A principal moving kids around this way is not CRT. CRT is a framework for understanding existing systems .

CRT is an academic theory/framework for legal analysis taught at upper levels, but "CRT" as now being used in public discourse refers to something akin to "critical social justice" policies. Whatever you would call the framework or theory behind "moving kids around this way" (and teaching kids about "whiteness", etc.) is what people are shorthanding as "CRT."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since CRT is a graduate school level academic subject, no elementary schooler is studying it.

That snark is stale and it won't hunt. Most sentient people reasonably understand that what's being discussed is not CRT as it is taught in-law schools and in higher education, but rather, aspects derived from its principles.

Could you please elaborate on exactly what those aspects are?

Thanks.

Not the pp, but broadly stated, segregation is one aspect derived from its principles.
https://www.blackenterprise.com/atlanta-school-principal-under-fire-for-racially-segregated-classrooms/

Uh no. CRT would examine the racial impetus behind SYSTEMS of segregation in our country (eg redlining) and the legal ramifications and outcomes . A principal moving kids around this way is not CRT. CRT is a framework for understanding existing systems .

CRT is an academic theory/framework for legal analysis taught at upper levels, but "CRT" as now being used in public discourse refers to something akin to "critical social justice" policies. Whatever you would call the framework or theory behind "moving kids around this way" (and teaching kids about "whiteness", etc.) is what people are shorthanding as "CRT."

Anonymous wrote:Weird that no one is talking about this as it’s on national news

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who doesn’t live in Loudoun County and can avoid the weird weirdos on both sides of this issue is winning.

There is no “both sides” here.

Sure is. Those who are concerned about the direction of the school system and those who aren’t.

False equivalency. Those who are “concerned” are lunatics who are living in some alternate reality.

The board was elected by the people, for the people and is doing fine. They won’t be recalled. And they will be re-elected. This is a bright blue county. There is no appetite for backwards, right-wing school board members.

Anonymous wrote:Good for her. I'm sure she will find another teaching position. She sounds like a great teacher. A loss for Loudoun.

This Loudoun Co. School Board is a mess. Glad that people are calling them out. They are like little tyrants who wield their power because they have it. Not in the best interest of students or parents.
Hope the recall is effective and that they get some reasonable people on the board.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since CRT is a graduate school level academic subject, no elementary schooler is studying it.

That snark is stale and it won't hunt. Most sentient people reasonably understand that what's being discussed is not CRT as it is taught in-law schools and in higher education, but rather, aspects derived from its principles.

Could you please elaborate on exactly what those aspects are?

Thanks.

Not the pp, but broadly stated, segregation is one aspect derived from its principles.
https://www.blackenterprise.com/atlanta-school-principal-under-fire-for-racially-segregated-classrooms/

Uh no. CRT would examine the racial impetus behind SYSTEMS of segregation in our country (eg redlining) and the legal ramifications and outcomes . A principal moving kids around this way is not CRT. CRT is a framework for understanding existing systems .