Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a charter teacher and half days are common the charter world. We need them in order to do all the many things necessary in order to have consistently high-quality instruction. We wouldn’t have time otherwise without having an entire day off every month.
Get back to me about “high quality instruction” when you are actually teaching all kids in school 5 days/week.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a charter teacher and half days are common the charter world. We need them in order to do all the many things necessary in order to have consistently high-quality instruction. We wouldn’t have time otherwise without having an entire day off every month.
Anonymous wrote:If they do this the other school days would have to be longer to make up for missing hours from weds
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:IF teachers were to receive high quality and meaningful professional development geared to help them manage the extreme differentiation needs they will be seeing next year, it could be worth it.
That is a very big IF.
On the last pd day our facilitator couldn’t work teams and then had us read one poem out loud 3 times. This took 2 hours. I was so upset to miss the time with my students.
Anonymous wrote:IF teachers were to receive high quality and meaningful professional development geared to help them manage the extreme differentiation needs they will be seeing next year, it could be worth it.
That is a very big IF.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's very unclear how it will result in better learning. The stated purpose (according to one poster) of Bias training and training to "accelerate learning" would be great, but they can do it on the pd days they already have. Of course catching kids up who need it would be great but those kids will be with "external partners" rather than their teachers. Time with their teachers is what the kids need. On a personal note, in another country we experienced full Wednesdays off and it felt like a total loss. The kids lost their sense of routine mid week. Naturally a half day is better than no Wednesday. Also the majority of kids may not be labeled as struggling but that does not mean that they don't need instruction and specials (specials would be cut under this system). Aftercare is not a substitute for school. It is also already difficult to find enough time in the week for all the specials classes. Science would probably be the one to go. In my opinion what DCPS needs is more/better science, more experiential learning and field trips to keep the kids engaged. A field trip on a few of those Wednesday afternoons would probably be more beneficial than this idea.
Yes, I totally agree. Taking an afternoon a week to do a different type activity that is **part of the curriculum** and overseen by classroom teachers could be great. Field trips, labs, projects integrated into the curriculum. But just throwing away an afternoon a week (adding up to a whole week of school time) for some vague plan is not that.
I was the PP talking about how fewer hours can lead to better learning and I completely agree with what your saying. Just remember that setting up all of these things does take time and teachers currently get only 45 minutes a day for grading, lesson planning, parent communication, student check ins (particularly necessary for kids dealing with trauma/peer conflicts). At some point, something will have to kid to make the programming you are recommending, which I think is an awesome idea, possible.