Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh please.
My parents did this, and it helped us build equity in a good investment. After a while we sold our first home and bought our second without any additional help.
It’s not different than any other advantages the well off have.
And I am sure you paid your parents back for all that they did for you.
If parents are trying to pull kids into the UMC, they don’t want to be paid back after they transfer wealth
DP. If the parents are gifting their kids luxury homes, the family is UC, not UMC.
not necessarily. I define upper class as enough wealth to be able to live off of that wealth. An attorney making 400k a year still needs to work to enjoy their life style. A kid with a trust fund generating the same amount does not need to work. The attorney will be able to help their kids buy a home, but those kids will also likely have to work to earn a living
The attorney will be taxed more than the trust fund kid and if he/she lives on either coast, they will not have enough money to help their kids buy houses, no. People don’t start making $400 when they start working.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know it's not new for parents to help their adult kids out with their first home financially but the number of parents I know buying their adult kids luxury homes is astounding. Has this become a new trend? I recently reunited with a few old friends from high school (we are now all in our early 30s and yes we grew up in expensive homes in a HCOL area) and a number of them have managed to buy 800K plus homes with their parents co-signing the mortgage because they would never be approved for it on their own. These people include a lawyer who put out a shingle and ekes out 65k a year, a friend who went to dental school and has the loans to prove it but upon graduation got married and pregnant and never practiced while her husband is a middle school teacher and an HR assistant at a fortune 500 company making 55k a year. I get helping your kids but why buy them such expensive houses when there salary would never justify it?
Maybe the HR assistant bought $1000 of Etherium in December 2016 and paid for the house in CASH. You assume a lot and have a toxic jealous mind. you should focus on yourself and not worry about the financial circumstances of others. It isn't healthy
They've openly admitted to their parents co signing so there's no assumption there. There is no jealousy here, I personally would not allow for my parents to co-sign a jumbo loan for me in my 30s. I just find it infantilizing and you'll always be beholden to your parents for their financial help rather than growing up and being an adult.
Totally agree. In a way, it means the parents are still in charge. I’m sure the PPs who were gifted homes have great parents, but usually when someone gives you a large sum of money, they expect things from you in return.
Anonymous wrote:Interesting class study in this thread. It’s very middle class to think you have earn something. Upper class doesn’t view nepotism and social capital as a character flaw but rather a sign that you’re smart and successful and worthy of the benefits this gives you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh please.
My parents did this, and it helped us build equity in a good investment. After a while we sold our first home and bought our second without any additional help.
It’s not different than any other advantages the well off have.
And I am sure you paid your parents back for all that they did for you.
If parents are trying to pull kids into the UMC, they don’t want to be paid back after they transfer wealth
DP. If the parents are gifting their kids luxury homes, the family is UC, not UMC.
not necessarily. I define upper class as enough wealth to be able to live off of that wealth. An attorney making 400k a year still needs to work to enjoy their life style. A kid with a trust fund generating the same amount does not need to work. The attorney will be able to help their kids buy a home, but those kids will also likely have to work to earn a living
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This whole thread would be irrelevant if people could just mind their own business, focus on their own life rather than others, and seek happiness outside of material things.
Do you also not realize how privileged you are to be able to criticize other well off people for not being well off in the “right way”?
90% of you need to look into therapy.
Weirdly defensive response addressed to no one, bro.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I trust you are reading the news about the increasing gap between the haves and the have nots? This is what it looks like to build generational wealth.
+1. Soon enough the ruling class will demand titles.
This is a good idea. I could be an Earl.
I am Sir Loin of Beef.
You need 100billion plus to qualify for a Dukedom, like the Duke of Amazon or the Duke of Tesla so my guess is at least 500M for an Earldom. Are you sure you aren't just landed farmers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I trust you are reading the news about the increasing gap between the haves and the have nots? This is what it looks like to build generational wealth.
+1. Soon enough the ruling class will demand titles.
This is a good idea. I could be an Earl.
I am Sir Loin of Beef.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I trust you are reading the news about the increasing gap between the haves and the have nots? This is what it looks like to build generational wealth.
+1. Soon enough the ruling class will demand titles.
This is a good idea. I could be an Earl.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh please.
My parents did this, and it helped us build equity in a good investment. After a while we sold our first home and bought our second without any additional help.
It’s not different than any other advantages the well off have.
God, I'm so tired of these worthless adult children who cannot manage to eke out a living for themselves. It's so infuriating. My younger brother is the same way and it's definitely a generational crutch. I don't know how the boomers allowed their kids to make it into 30s and 40s while still supporting them. These "kids" are such a drain on the workforce because they cannot actually do things for themselves. They have no residency, no ingenuity, no resolve. They simple just ask mom and dad to open up their wallets and all their issues solved.
This is precisely why in hiring I look at where these kids went to HS. I want to know if they're part of the man-child class of kids who grew up with substantial wealth and privilege and are unable to leave the nest and make a living on their own. I don't want that class working for me.
Parents, we must do better by our kids. I know it's hard, but teach them how to make it themselves. Your kids will learn a lot through hardship. Even if you can afford more, make them work for it themselves. They will thank you for it in the end - and so will society.