Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Miraclemomma wrote:
Let's be honest, productivity at home is not even close to productivy in office.
She knows it, you know it, we all know it.
Enough BS people. Show up for work or expect to be fired, in not too far of a future.
This simply is not true. So you really want to sit in traffic all day? Sit through hours of small talk, waiting at a printer, looking for food in unsanitary work cafeterias?
So much of what we do at work is filler. Between commuting, meetings for people to brag about their vacations/kids/pets, and all kinds of office politics that usually start from silly or mindless unintentional comment?
Telework is the best thing for companies. They can cut real estate, overhead, and the already push it off on the employee. If a company cannot measure productivity, then they have a bad system to start with. Work has changed. Slavery used to be the norm, child labor and even certain dangerous jobs. Daily commuting into an office is just not something worth doing anymore.

Anonymous wrote:Miraclemomma wrote:
Let's be honest, productivity at home is not even close to productivy in office.
She knows it, you know it, we all know it.
Enough BS people. Show up for work or expect to be fired, in not too far of a future.
Anonymous wrote:Serious question: does anyone enjoy the birthday celebrations?
Anonymous wrote:It’s a dumb article but there are some valid points. The people who suffer most from telework are the more junior staff that just don’t get as much professional development. I’m a senior person and would love to continue to just work from home most of the time but it’s not really fair to the junior folks. I know they are struggling. Face time for face time’s sake is dumb but the truth is that most humans are better at developing connections in person. We are struggling with finding the balance, as an office.
I also think that many employers will just hire peoole in lower COLA locations rather than people around here, if they are going to be primarily remote. That happened years ago with customer service and then with IT support, when businesses realized how someone could do it from Ohio for 50K just as easily as someone in DC doing it for 80K.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sh*t is going down
Merrill says she didn't make the title of the op-ed, so that's why the first one was changed.
Editors have final say over the titles of articles, not the authors.
What happened is that the WaPo Op-Ed editor created the first title. Then Merrill -being part of an "old money" white DC family - pulled strings and complained to Fred Hiatt that it's too threatening. Even though she directly threatens her employees in her article! They then swapped out with a new title, which clearly was meant to bury the lede.
The damage is already done from a legal perspective. That article was a dumpster fire of liability. I'm sure her attorneys will be getting paid good money to work all weekend.
I wouldn’t be shocked if DOL takes a hard look at their classification of employees / contractors, since this CEO just said, in writing, to the world, that she can change your employee status if you want to work from home.
How truly stupid is this woman?
Inherited wealth means you get to continually fail upward and hold others' lives in your hands, like pawns on a chessboard. This is what happens when people inherit their way into the C-suite.
Any smart, wealthy family turns over the reins to professional managers who can maximize growth and profitability. You think the Mars, Wrigley, or Walton family heirs are managing their respective companies? No, they are counting checks and leave the bean counting to professionals, all while maintaining control of their companies. Their heirs will do the same for generations so long as they are smart enough to not touch the principle.
Miraclemomma wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sh*t is going down
Merrill says she didn't make the title of the op-ed, so that's why the first one was changed.
Editors have final say over the titles of articles, not the authors.
What happened is that the WaPo Op-Ed editor created the first title. Then Merrill -being part of an "old money" white DC family - pulled strings and complained to Fred Hiatt that it's too threatening. Even though she directly threatens her employees in her article! They then swapped out with a new title, which clearly was meant to bury the lede.
The damage is already done from a legal perspective. That article was a dumpster fire of liability. I'm sure her attorneys will be getting paid good money to work all weekend.
I wouldn’t be shocked if DOL takes a hard look at their classification of employees / contractors, since this CEO just said, in writing, to the world, that she can change your employee status if you want to work from home.
How truly stupid is this woman?
Anonymous wrote:It’s a dumb article but there are some valid points. The people who suffer most from telework are the more junior staff that just don’t get as much professional development. I’m a senior person and would love to continue to just work from home most of the time but it’s not really fair to the junior folks. I know they are struggling. Face time for face time’s sake is dumb but the truth is that most humans are better at developing connections in person. We are struggling with finding the balance, as an office.
I also think that many employers will just hire peoole in lower COLA locations rather than people around here, if they are going to be primarily remote. That happened years ago with customer service and then with IT support, when businesses realized how someone could do it from Ohio for 50K just as easily as someone in DC doing it for 80K.
Anonymous wrote:Wow, good work staff!
Think the pro-telework folks should actually thank this "CEO"--she has done a great job undercutting and making ridiculous her side of the argument.