Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe Move Bernie to the Boys academy director. He might be able to jumpstart the development that Asa hunt had any luck in doing.
Why would they do that? Have you seen how bad the U9-U12 girls program has become?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe Move Bernie to the Boys academy director. He might be able to jumpstart the development that Asa hunt had any luck in doing.
Why would they do that? Have you seen how bad the U9-U12 girls program has become?
Still much better than the boys. Its gotten really bad on the boys side.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe Move Bernie to the Boys academy director. He might be able to jumpstart the development that Asa hunt had any luck in doing.
Why would they do that? Have you seen how bad the U9-U12 girls program has become?
Anonymous wrote:Maybe Move Bernie to the Boys academy director. He might be able to jumpstart the development that Asa hunt had any luck in doing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fees at the U10 level are lower for the next year, low barrier of entry for young players looking for a travel option. Bridge fees still a fraction of Academy at. U11 and above.
Wow. They really did drop those fees! Need to add players.
Anonymous wrote:Fees at the U10 level are lower for the next year, low barrier of entry for young players looking for a travel option. Bridge fees still a fraction of Academy at. U11 and above.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any NEW travel teams formed will be through the academy only so Bridge will be a legacy thing and die off.
This would not surprise me if it is true. The Bridge teams are fun and do well but they seem to be take away talent from theAcademy. The Academy has always treated the Bridge teams like bad step children.
Anonymous wrote:Any NEW travel teams formed will be through the academy only so Bridge will be a legacy thing and die off.