Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Go ahead and try to create a “PTO tax” and see how that works out. DC Council flirted with the idea of taking PTO funds from NW schools and giving them to poor schools. Parents made it clear their funding of the PTO would stop immediately and contributions a would be in-kind instead. Parents who are already paying their fair share in taxes expect the money they spend to benefit their own children to do just that. Not to be used for a Robinhood effort.
The problem with this argument is that many, many school districts prohibit this kind of fundraising by individual PTOs. Having one school raise 100k while another does not even have a PTO is clearly an issue. A redistribution of a portion of funds would make good sense. Or a program with a partner school to build long-term bonds.
Having one PTO raise $100K and another does not is clearly not an issue, because $100,000 is a drop in the bucket of a school budget. DC spends $23,000 on *each* student in a school. We have the second highest school funding in the country. The money PTO's raise is a nice gesture but it ultimately doesn't a lick of difference to anything.
https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/2020/comm/school-system-spending.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just so we are all clear:
Wilson HS- 39% white (Racist)
Washington Latin- 35% white (Not Racist)
https://latinpcs.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2018-10-29-Washington-Latin-PCS-%E2%80%93-Upper-School-HS-PMF.pdf
BASIS DC- 45% white (Not Racist)
https://www.myschooldc.org/schools/profile/138
Makes total sense to me.
You can’t be that dumb. What is the difference between Wilson and the other two schools? Could it be that they’re charters and charters are lottery? Wilson is by property rights. Lottery for all HS would make Wilson in the same category as charters. (Not endorsing just pointing it out.)
I don’t get a meaningful distinction. Different methods of entry, so people get there by different routes. One relies on some luck, and one requires restricting your housing search by geography (and probably settling for much smaller housing).
I don’t see some big moral difference.
Ahh it’s too obvious and you don’t want to see it. I got it.
Is it your belief that children of color are, year after year, exceedingly unlucky at the Basis and Latin lotteries? Or, perhaps, is there some other kind of selection process at issue that results in disproportionately white student bodies?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Go ahead and try to create a “PTO tax” and see how that works out. DC Council flirted with the idea of taking PTO funds from NW schools and giving them to poor schools. Parents made it clear their funding of the PTO would stop immediately and contributions a would be in-kind instead. Parents who are already paying their fair share in taxes expect the money they spend to benefit their own children to do just that. Not to be used for a Robinhood effort.
The problem with this argument is that many, many school districts prohibit this kind of fundraising by individual PTOs. Having one school raise 100k while another does not even have a PTO is clearly an issue. A redistribution of a portion of funds would make good sense. Or a program with a partner school to build long-term bonds.
Having one PTO raise $100K and another does not is clearly not an issue, because $100,000 is a drop in the bucket of a school budget. DC spends $23,000 on *each* student in a school. We have the second highest school funding in the country. The money PTO's raise is a nice gesture but it ultimately doesn't a lick of difference to anything.
https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/2020/comm/school-system-spending.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just so we are all clear:
Wilson HS- 39% white (Racist)
Washington Latin- 35% white (Not Racist)
https://latinpcs.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2018-10-29-Washington-Latin-PCS-%E2%80%93-Upper-School-HS-PMF.pdf
BASIS DC- 45% white (Not Racist)
https://www.myschooldc.org/schools/profile/138
Makes total sense to me.
You can’t be that dumb. What is the difference between Wilson and the other two schools? Could it be that they’re charters and charters are lottery? Wilson is by property rights. Lottery for all HS would make Wilson in the same category as charters. (Not endorsing just pointing it out.)
Before anyone suggests making all schools lottery, make sure you study the SF model. They did that and it has been a complete disaster. Blaming parents is easy. Finding solutions to these complex problems is incredibly hard. For starters, we need better leaders at DCPS. The mayor tries to control education but doesn’t know a damn thing about it. Schools are a marker of the society we live in. Schools cannot fix all our problems. We need an economic model that is a hybrid of capitalism and socialism. We don’t have that unfortunately.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just so we are all clear:
Wilson HS- 39% white (Racist)
Washington Latin- 35% white (Not Racist)
https://latinpcs.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2018-10-29-Washington-Latin-PCS-%E2%80%93-Upper-School-HS-PMF.pdf
BASIS DC- 45% white (Not Racist)
https://www.myschooldc.org/schools/profile/138
Makes total sense to me.
You can’t be that dumb. What is the difference between Wilson and the other two schools? Could it be that they’re charters and charters are lottery? Wilson is by property rights. Lottery for all HS would make Wilson in the same category as charters. (Not endorsing just pointing it out.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The "resources" being "hoarded" in some wards vs. others aren't things the state can fix: parental investment in children, commitment to education, a culture that promotes learning and self discipline and delayed gratification. NONE of these things are race based or even class-based (plenty of first-generation immigrant families send their kids to top-tier competitive schools in this country; plenty of families in economically challenged areas are committed to their kids' education). Some parents prioritize education and other don't. It is not the responsibility of the state or the responsibility of parents who do make this commitment to compromise for those families who don't care. It might sound harsh to say so but as someone whose kids have been told constantly by DCPS that they are oppressors and privileged and their achievements called into question because of the accident of their birth (even as they are being raised by a single mom who did NOT grow up privileged): F that. The more this school system sows racial discord in the name of "equity," the more it will deserve the whirlwind it reaps.
Where does your child go to school that they were told they were oppressors and privileged? My kids went to a predominately AA school and were never told this. In fact, the other parents shared my outlook on parenting and education. I seriously doubt you have a kid in DCPS.
dp: A number of NW schools take the line PP describes. Wilson is an example.
I have kids at Deal and haven’t heard anything from folks at Deal or other parents with older kids at Wilson but ok.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Go ahead and try to create a “PTO tax” and see how that works out. DC Council flirted with the idea of taking PTO funds from NW schools and giving them to poor schools. Parents made it clear their funding of the PTO would stop immediately and contributions a would be in-kind instead. Parents who are already paying their fair share in taxes expect the money they spend to benefit their own children to do just that. Not to be used for a Robinhood effort.
The problem with this argument is that many, many school districts prohibit this kind of fundraising by individual PTOs. Having one school raise 100k while another does not even have a PTO is clearly an issue. A redistribution of a portion of funds would make good sense. Or a program with a partner school to build long-term bonds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just so we are all clear:
Wilson HS- 39% white (Racist)
Washington Latin- 35% white (Not Racist)
https://latinpcs.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2018-10-29-Washington-Latin-PCS-%E2%80%93-Upper-School-HS-PMF.pdf
BASIS DC- 45% white (Not Racist)
https://www.myschooldc.org/schools/profile/138
Makes total sense to me.
You can’t be that dumb. What is the difference between Wilson and the other two schools? Could it be that they’re charters and charters are lottery? Wilson is by property rights. Lottery for all HS would make Wilson in the same category as charters. (Not endorsing just pointing it out.)
I don’t get a meaningful distinction. Different methods of entry, so people get there by different routes. One relies on some luck, and one requires restricting your housing search by geography (and probably settling for much smaller housing).
I don’t see some big moral difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just so we are all clear:
Wilson HS- 39% white (Racist)
Washington Latin- 35% white (Not Racist)
https://latinpcs.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2018-10-29-Washington-Latin-PCS-%E2%80%93-Upper-School-HS-PMF.pdf
BASIS DC- 45% white (Not Racist)
https://www.myschooldc.org/schools/profile/138
Makes total sense to me.
You can’t be that dumb. What is the difference between Wilson and the other two schools? Could it be that they’re charters and charters are lottery? Wilson is by property rights. Lottery for all HS would make Wilson in the same category as charters. (Not endorsing just pointing it out.)
I don’t get a meaningful distinction. Different methods of entry, so people get there by different routes. One relies on some luck, and one requires restricting your housing search by geography (and probably settling for much smaller housing).
I don’t see some big moral difference.
Ahh it’s too obvious and you don’t want to see it. I got it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Go ahead and try to create a “PTO tax” and see how that works out. DC Council flirted with the idea of taking PTO funds from NW schools and giving them to poor schools. Parents made it clear their funding of the PTO would stop immediately and contributions a would be in-kind instead. Parents who are already paying their fair share in taxes expect the money they spend to benefit their own children to do just that. Not to be used for a Robinhood effort.
The problem with this argument is that many, many school districts prohibit this kind of fundraising by individual PTOs. Having one school raise 100k while another does not even have a PTO is clearly an issue. A redistribution of a portion of funds would make good sense. Or a program with a partner school to build long-term bonds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Go ahead and try to create a “PTO tax” and see how that works out. DC Council flirted with the idea of taking PTO funds from NW schools and giving them to poor schools. Parents made it clear their funding of the PTO would stop immediately and contributions a would be in-kind instead. Parents who are already paying their fair share in taxes expect the money they spend to benefit their own children to do just that. Not to be used for a Robinhood effort.
The problem with this argument is that many, many school districts prohibit this kind of fundraising by individual PTOs. Having one school raise 100k while another does not even have a PTO is clearly an issue. A redistribution of a portion of funds would make good sense. Or a program with a partner school to build long-term bonds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just so we are all clear:
Wilson HS- 39% white (Racist)
Washington Latin- 35% white (Not Racist)
https://latinpcs.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2018-10-29-Washington-Latin-PCS-%E2%80%93-Upper-School-HS-PMF.pdf
BASIS DC- 45% white (Not Racist)
https://www.myschooldc.org/schools/profile/138
Makes total sense to me.
You can’t be that dumb. What is the difference between Wilson and the other two schools? Could it be that they’re charters and charters are lottery? Wilson is by property rights. Lottery for all HS would make Wilson in the same category as charters. (Not endorsing just pointing it out.)
I don’t get a meaningful distinction. Different methods of entry, so people get there by different routes. One relies on some luck, and one requires restricting your housing search by geography (and probably settling for much smaller housing).
I don’t see some big moral difference.
Ahh it’s too obvious and you don’t want to see it. I got it.
I welcome you to explain it to me.
And another question: Two families believe a solid math and science curriculum is right for their kids. They both buy nice row houses in Petworth. They both lottery for Basis. One wins the lottery; one loses. The latter moves to a condo zoned for Wilson.
So that story tells me that one of those families is surely racist and the other not?
Anonymous wrote:My guess is the people on their high horses have never set foot in a school in SE across the river, much less talked to any of the parents there.
I have, as I used to work for a non-profit that helps parents in Anacostia advocate for their kids. The number one question we got from the parents was, “How do I get my kid into a charter school?”
None of those parents wanted to have their kids in those schools, and anyone who could get their kid out did so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just so we are all clear:
Wilson HS- 39% white (Racist)
Washington Latin- 35% white (Not Racist)
https://latinpcs.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2018-10-29-Washington-Latin-PCS-%E2%80%93-Upper-School-HS-PMF.pdf
BASIS DC- 45% white (Not Racist)
https://www.myschooldc.org/schools/profile/138
Makes total sense to me.
You can’t be that dumb. What is the difference between Wilson and the other two schools? Could it be that they’re charters and charters are lottery? Wilson is by property rights. Lottery for all HS would make Wilson in the same category as charters. (Not endorsing just pointing it out.)
I don’t get a meaningful distinction. Different methods of entry, so people get there by different routes. One relies on some luck, and one requires restricting your housing search by geography (and probably settling for much smaller housing).
I don’t see some big moral difference.
Ahh it’s too obvious and you don’t want to see it. I got it.