Anonymous wrote:The superiority complexes on this these are enough to make you go hmmm
Having a sub 1400 SAT does not mean the kid didn’t “master” high school. Good lord. Some people are not good test takers. My DC gets so nervous for standardized tests that he threw up the morning of the test. Not everyone can sit in a room and have their entire lives laying out in front of them, depending on whether or not they ace the test.
Anonymous wrote:Schools are political and public entities. They want and NEED to admit more Black students politically. They are willing to lower their statistical standards to get them. The next issue is performance once they get in. Poor grades leads to shifts in majors away from STEM to easier paths. That will be the next correction. (No grades in college?). The correction needs to take place starting in preschool but that is much more difficult because it is expensive and requires a cultural shift in how education is valued and the need for a stable family unit. Instead we get lipstick on a pig.Anonymous wrote:
OK. Let me guess you are one of those 50 white people who think ignoring race makes it all fair and police killings would stop if race was not thought about. The race blind people are racist. what the post means is that anyone who wants to go to a top school needs take make themselves elite/excellent or pointy at something and have good grades. The days of UMC kids with tutors and involved parents getting into top colleges based on tutored test scores and tutored/parent aided grades are over. all kids need to bring something in addition to top grades. its just a changing of the rules. you can pines for the days when all of the rules favored rich white as much as you like but they ain't coming back and they are not race and economic class neutral.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get it. I think this social justice experiment is going to sink the top colleges though. So it doesn't matter if you don't get in because the names won't be worth anything in a few years anyway.
Change is always hard for those who feel disadvantaged by a change.... The top schools are here to stay. It took 100s of years to get so powerful/popular/famous and it will take decades to change the paradigm. The feelings of certain UMC white parents are meaningless as long as elite kids and the likes of Amanda Gore are getting in to T30 colleges and making outsize marks on the United States. This approach to admissions is working very well for top universities.
The point posters are missing is that there is an overall decrease in advantages UMC whites have received for any american prize (education/job). Elite people of any race are now getting those advantages over typical UMC whites. The sooner UMC white parents realize this the better for their kids-- develop an excellence at anything your kid likes and they glide through the door to all the advantages White UMC families had in the past.
Sorry. I just have this strong feeling that it is wrong to judge people based on the color of their skin. And I don't think this feeling will ever go away.
Now that doesn’t benefit you any longer? Got it!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get it. I think this social justice experiment is going to sink the top colleges though. So it doesn't matter if you don't get in because the names won't be worth anything in a few years anyway.
Change is always hard for those who feel disadvantaged by a change.... The top schools are here to stay. It took 100s of years to get so powerful/popular/famous and it will take decades to change the paradigm. The feelings of certain UMC white parents are meaningless as long as elite kids and the likes of Amanda Gore are getting in to T30 colleges and making outsize marks on the United States. This approach to admissions is working very well for top universities.
The point posters are missing is that there is an overall decrease in advantages UMC whites have received for any american prize (education/job). Elite people of any race are now getting those advantages over typical UMC whites. The sooner UMC white parents realize this the better for their kids-- develop an excellence at anything your kid likes and they glide through the door to all the advantages White UMC families had in the past.
Sorry. I just have this strong feeling that it is wrong to judge people based on the color of their skin. And I don't think this feeling will ever go away.
Schools are political and public entities. They want and NEED to admit more Black students politically. They are willing to lower their statistical standards to get them. The next issue is performance once they get in. Poor grades leads to shifts in majors away from STEM to easier paths. That will be the next correction. (No grades in college?). The correction needs to take place starting in preschool but that is much more difficult because it is expensive and requires a cultural shift in how education is valued and the need for a stable family unit. Instead we get lipstick on a pig.Anonymous wrote:
OK. Let me guess you are one of those 50 white people who think ignoring race makes it all fair and police killings would stop if race was not thought about. The race blind people are racist. what the post means is that anyone who wants to go to a top school needs take make themselves elite/excellent or pointy at something and have good grades. The days of UMC kids with tutors and involved parents getting into top colleges based on tutored test scores and tutored/parent aided grades are over. all kids need to bring something in addition to top grades. its just a changing of the rules. you can pines for the days when all of the rules favored rich white as much as you like but they ain't coming back and they are not race and economic class neutral.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:35 ACT helped my DS get into schools.
Was that this year?
35 ACT didn’t do much for mine this admission season.
Anonymous wrote:35 ACT helped my DS get into schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get it. I think this social justice experiment is going to sink the top colleges though. So it doesn't matter if you don't get in because the names won't be worth anything in a few years anyway.
Change is always hard for those who feel disadvantaged by a change.... The top schools are here to stay. It took 100s of years to get so powerful/popular/famous and it will take decades to change the paradigm. The feelings of certain UMC white parents are meaningless as long as elite kids and the likes of Amanda Gore are getting in to T30 colleges and making outsize marks on the United States. This approach to admissions is working very well for top universities.
The point posters are missing is that there is an overall decrease in advantages UMC whites have received for any american prize (education/job). Elite people of any race are now getting those advantages over typical UMC whites. The sooner UMC white parents realize this the better for their kids-- develop an excellence at anything your kid likes and they glide through the door to all the advantages White UMC families had in the past.
Sorry. I just have this strong feeling that it is wrong to judge people based on the color of their skin. And I don't think this feeling will ever go away.
Anonymous wrote:Daughter who's a junior pulled a 1490 on her first SAT attempt in March, cold, I mean zero preparation. Now she has a tutor and is signed up to take it again in June. Her tutor told me that based on what she's observed in their sessions so far she expects her to get a 1550+ on the second try.
I want to be excited for her, but after reading this board along with so many newspaper articles on how test optional is changing the admission landscape, I can't help but think she came along a couple years too late to be a high-achiever but an otherwise normal kid, by which I mean she's ranked near the top of her class, plays sports, is involved in clubs, but isn't a "URM" or a "first-generation student" and has no interest in being some nationally known social justice activist or social media influencer.
She's just a really smart kid who'll likely become a doctor, pharmacist, PT, or something in that mold, and her test scores were going to be what set her apart from all the other kids who've been handed high grades during Zoom school and can make up a bunch of extracurriculars and "leadership roles" for their applications.
I worry that some kid like that who probably couldn't pull a 1300-1400 with a year of prep will end up taking a spot that should have gone to my daughter. That might sound bad, but what parent likes seeing their kid lose out on opportunities to someone who they know is less talented and less capable?
I hate test optional!
Test optional can SMD!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get it. I think this social justice experiment is going to sink the top colleges though. So it doesn't matter if you don't get in because the names won't be worth anything in a few years anyway.
Change is always hard for those who feel disadvantaged by a change.... The top schools are here to stay. It took 100s of years to get so powerful/popular/famous and it will take decades to change the paradigm. The feelings of certain UMC white parents are meaningless as long as elite kids and the likes of Amanda Gore are getting in to T30 colleges and making outsize marks on the United States. This approach to admissions is working very well for top universities.
The point posters are missing is that there is an overall decrease in advantages UMC whites have received for any american prize (education/job). Elite people of any race are now getting those advantages over typical UMC whites. The sooner UMC white parents realize this the better for their kids-- develop an excellence at anything your kid likes and they glide through the door to all the advantages White UMC families had in the past.
Sorry. I just have this strong feeling that it is wrong to judge people based on the color of their skin. And I don't think this feeling will ever go away.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get it. I think this social justice experiment is going to sink the top colleges though. So it doesn't matter if you don't get in because the names won't be worth anything in a few years anyway.
Change is always hard for those who feel disadvantaged by a change.... The top schools are here to stay. It took 100s of years to get so powerful/popular/famous and it will take decades to change the paradigm. The feelings of certain UMC white parents are meaningless as long as elite kids and the likes of Amanda Gore are getting in to T30 colleges and making outsize marks on the United States. This approach to admissions is working very well for top universities.
The point posters are missing is that there is an overall decrease in advantages UMC whites have received for any american prize (education/job). Elite people of any race are now getting those advantages over typical UMC whites. The sooner UMC white parents realize this the better for their kids-- develop an excellence at anything your kid likes and they glide through the door to all the advantages White UMC families had in the past.
Anonymous wrote:I get it. I think this social justice experiment is going to sink the top colleges though. So it doesn't matter if you don't get in because the names won't be worth anything in a few years anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Admissions people hate The College Board. Hate it.
They hate that people think they don’t know how to read an application and need a stupid standardized test, which had constant security issues (looking up how many times SATs were cancelled because of cheating) and inherent issues that benefit certain testers.
Admissions doesn’t need testing. Presidents, faculty, trustees, and alumni (and parents) who can’t wrap their heads around reading an application THINK admissions needs testing.