Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What evidence do you have that these changes will actually lead to kids gaining a better understanding of the basics of math? Serious question.
NP. What evidence do you have that they won’t?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's a video on this cite that walks through the initiative: https://www.doe.virginia.gov/instruction/mathematics/vmpi/index.shtml#time
It looks like a positive thing. Kids can still take calculus by the end of high school. I don't know what some of you are talking about. VA is modernizing their math curriculum which has been the same damn courses for the past 30+ years. Kids who love STEM but have a particular focus can tailor 1/2 credit modules to fit their interests, which means they will be more engaged in what they're learning. THAT'S HUGE! So now a kid who is interested in computer science can take modules in logic and reasoning and discrete mathmatics. A kid interested in data science can take statistics and data analysis. Or, they can still take calculus if they really want or need to do so. AND, they're still offering AP classes. I don't get why some parents are so up in arms. It sounds great!
It does! And there’s no stopping it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's a video on this cite that walks through the initiative: https://www.doe.virginia.gov/instruction/mathematics/vmpi/index.shtml#time
It looks like a positive thing. Kids can still take calculus by the end of high school. I don't know what some of you are talking about. VA is modernizing their math curriculum which has been the same damn courses for the past 30+ years. Kids who love STEM but have a particular focus can tailor 1/2 credit modules to fit their interests, which means they will be more engaged in what they're learning. THAT'S HUGE! So now a kid who is interested in computer science can take modules in logic and reasoning and discrete mathmatics. A kid interested in data science can take statistics and data analysis. Or, they can still take calculus if they really want or need to do so. AND, they're still offering AP classes. I don't get why some parents are so up in arms. It sounds great!
I like the greater variety of offerings in 11th-12th and the idea of introducing statistical concepts earlier. My main issue with it is this idea that magically, a teacher is now going to be able to appropriately address the needs of students from remedial to gifted all in one classroom, whether it's kindergarten or 10th grade. That is fantasy land. Reality is the teacher will have to focus on the students who are below standard. The students who pick it up quickly end up bored, turned off of math, and probably drafted to be teachers' aides. It seems their solution to not enough URM students being identified as gifted in math is to just not allow anyone to be gifted in math and get an appropriately demanding experience in the subject. That's not equity. I don't mind that my kids would be introduced to algebra in 8th grade (that's when I took it) but I do mind that they would lose their love of math because they are doing the same thing over and over while the teacher tries to get other kids up to speed. If it's so great to give the quicker kids deeper exploration, then there should be different class sections for the kids who are ready for that depth and a teacher who is actually focused on their needs.
It is also a concern that they are IMO being vague about what they mean about getting to calculus. Will AP Calculus BC be offered? Or is it just AB? Kids applying to elite engineering programs should have BC to be competitive. They say, oh, it won't be a disadvantage in applications since students are judged against what's offered at your school. So, fine (maybe?) for admissions but then you show up for college and are in classes with students who have mostly taken BC. Now you are not able to perform at the same level.
Kids get pushed into accelerated math because their parents have either paid for tutors or have the ability to expose them to advanced math concepts at home, and they've picked up the concepts. Those kids aren't necessarily gifted in math, they are just ahead. It would be a nice change for northern Virginians to get out of this competitive thing we do in all aspects of our lives, including pushing and pressuring our children to be ahead of their peers. 95% of kids won't need BC calculus. Those who do will get it in college again anyway. Hate to break it to you, but there's not much difference between AB and BC. If your kid was ready for BC in 12th, they'll be ready as a freshman.
Some kids are crazy bored and push themselves into accelerated math, without tutors or parents pushing them at home. They're crazy bored because, as PP noted, they end up as just the teacher's aide, responsible for teaching all their peers instead of learning anything new themselves.
I'm also concerned about the vaguery of calculus - I'm worried that the students who do want to take it will have to, in practice, take a year of summer school to get the full progression of topics to get them ready for calculus in 12th.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I never thought I would say this but I actually support the changes that VA is going to make.
It will almost certainly go through because too many parents are disillusion regarding their kids abilities and their kids never learn the basics of math and this becomes evident in high school.
What evidence do you have that these changes will actually lead to kids gaining a better understanding of the basics of math? Serious question.
NP. What evidence do you have that they won’t?
Anonymous wrote:There's a video on this cite that walks through the initiative: https://www.doe.virginia.gov/instruction/mathematics/vmpi/index.shtml#time
It looks like a positive thing. Kids can still take calculus by the end of high school. I don't know what some of you are talking about. VA is modernizing their math curriculum which has been the same damn courses for the past 30+ years. Kids who love STEM but have a particular focus can tailor 1/2 credit modules to fit their interests, which means they will be more engaged in what they're learning. THAT'S HUGE! So now a kid who is interested in computer science can take modules in logic and reasoning and discrete mathmatics. A kid interested in data science can take statistics and data analysis. Or, they can still take calculus if they really want or need to do so. AND, they're still offering AP classes. I don't get why some parents are so up in arms. It sounds great!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I never thought I would say this but I actually support the changes that VA is going to make.
It will almost certainly go through because too many parents are disillusion regarding their kids abilities and their kids never learn the basics of math and this becomes evident in high school.
What evidence do you have that these changes will actually lead to kids gaining a better understanding of the basics of math? Serious question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's a video on this cite that walks through the initiative: https://www.doe.virginia.gov/instruction/mathematics/vmpi/index.shtml#time
It looks like a positive thing. Kids can still take calculus by the end of high school. I don't know what some of you are talking about. VA is modernizing their math curriculum which has been the same damn courses for the past 30+ years. Kids who love STEM but have a particular focus can tailor 1/2 credit modules to fit their interests, which means they will be more engaged in what they're learning. THAT'S HUGE! So now a kid who is interested in computer science can take modules in logic and reasoning and discrete mathmatics. A kid interested in data science can take statistics and data analysis. Or, they can still take calculus if they really want or need to do so. AND, they're still offering AP classes. I don't get why some parents are so up in arms. It sounds great!
I like the greater variety of offerings in 11th-12th and the idea of introducing statistical concepts earlier. My main issue with it is this idea that magically, a teacher is now going to be able to appropriately address the needs of students from remedial to gifted all in one classroom, whether it's kindergarten or 10th grade. That is fantasy land. Reality is the teacher will have to focus on the students who are below standard. The students who pick it up quickly end up bored, turned off of math, and probably drafted to be teachers' aides. It seems their solution to not enough URM students being identified as gifted in math is to just not allow anyone to be gifted in math and get an appropriately demanding experience in the subject. That's not equity. I don't mind that my kids would be introduced to algebra in 8th grade (that's when I took it) but I do mind that they would lose their love of math because they are doing the same thing over and over while the teacher tries to get other kids up to speed. If it's so great to give the quicker kids deeper exploration, then there should be different class sections for the kids who are ready for that depth and a teacher who is actually focused on their needs.
It is also a concern that they are IMO being vague about what they mean about getting to calculus. Will AP Calculus BC be offered? Or is it just AB? Kids applying to elite engineering programs should have BC to be competitive. They say, oh, it won't be a disadvantage in applications since students are judged against what's offered at your school. So, fine (maybe?) for admissions but then you show up for college and are in classes with students who have mostly taken BC. Now you are not able to perform at the same level.
Kids get pushed into accelerated math because their parents have either paid for tutors or have the ability to expose them to advanced math concepts at home, and they've picked up the concepts. Those kids aren't necessarily gifted in math, they are just ahead. It would be a nice change for northern Virginians to get out of this competitive thing we do in all aspects of our lives, including pushing and pressuring our children to be ahead of their peers. 95% of kids won't need BC calculus. Those who do will get it in college again anyway. Hate to break it to you, but there's not much difference between AB and BC. If your kid was ready for BC in 12th, they'll be ready as a freshman.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's a video on this cite that walks through the initiative: https://www.doe.virginia.gov/instruction/mathematics/vmpi/index.shtml#time
It looks like a positive thing. Kids can still take calculus by the end of high school. I don't know what some of you are talking about. VA is modernizing their math curriculum which has been the same damn courses for the past 30+ years. Kids who love STEM but have a particular focus can tailor 1/2 credit modules to fit their interests, which means they will be more engaged in what they're learning. THAT'S HUGE! So now a kid who is interested in computer science can take modules in logic and reasoning and discrete mathmatics. A kid interested in data science can take statistics and data analysis. Or, they can still take calculus if they really want or need to do so. AND, they're still offering AP classes. I don't get why some parents are so up in arms. It sounds great!
I like the greater variety of offerings in 11th-12th and the idea of introducing statistical concepts earlier. My main issue with it is this idea that magically, a teacher is now going to be able to appropriately address the needs of students from remedial to gifted all in one classroom, whether it's kindergarten or 10th grade. That is fantasy land. Reality is the teacher will have to focus on the students who are below standard. The students who pick it up quickly end up bored, turned off of math, and probably drafted to be teachers' aides. It seems their solution to not enough URM students being identified as gifted in math is to just not allow anyone to be gifted in math and get an appropriately demanding experience in the subject. That's not equity. I don't mind that my kids would be introduced to algebra in 8th grade (that's when I took it) but I do mind that they would lose their love of math because they are doing the same thing over and over while the teacher tries to get other kids up to speed. If it's so great to give the quicker kids deeper exploration, then there should be different class sections for the kids who are ready for that depth and a teacher who is actually focused on their needs.
It is also a concern that they are IMO being vague about what they mean about getting to calculus. Will AP Calculus BC be offered? Or is it just AB? Kids applying to elite engineering programs should have BC to be competitive. They say, oh, it won't be a disadvantage in applications since students are judged against what's offered at your school. So, fine (maybe?) for admissions but then you show up for college and are in classes with students who have mostly taken BC. Now you are not able to perform at the same level.
Anonymous wrote:There's a video on this cite that walks through the initiative: https://www.doe.virginia.gov/instruction/mathematics/vmpi/index.shtml#time
It looks like a positive thing. Kids can still take calculus by the end of high school. I don't know what some of you are talking about. VA is modernizing their math curriculum which has been the same damn courses for the past 30+ years. Kids who love STEM but have a particular focus can tailor 1/2 credit modules to fit their interests, which means they will be more engaged in what they're learning. THAT'S HUGE! So now a kid who is interested in computer science can take modules in logic and reasoning and discrete mathmatics. A kid interested in data science can take statistics and data analysis. Or, they can still take calculus if they really want or need to do so. AND, they're still offering AP classes. I don't get why some parents are so up in arms. It sounds great!
Anonymous wrote:You tube link to DOE webinar going on now: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEPUWhIC2tI