Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCPS' listening session tonight is a shocking display of NIMBY-ism on the part of the Foxhall community.
I was sick to my stomach.
Summary: “I value diversity BUT I value my ability to picnic outside more”
Bravo to the Hispanic/Jewish gentlemen that spoke up.
Your post is inaccurate and unnecessarily polarizing. Many speakers clearly made the point that the neighborhood values the green space at Hardy Park and they want to preserve it. Why is that so wrong to want to preserve green space in a city and ask questions about other site selection options? And they don't trust DCPS to build out the property in a manner that properly preserves whatever remains of the park. After the Christmas Eve giveaway of the Old Hardy School we should all be skeptical of DC gov/DCPS intentions.
Speakers also pointed out other key problems with the location of the two new schools and the complete lack of transparency for the selection of the Foxhall site or how these new schools fit into the larger, longterm school facilities plan. Just look at a map, the location of the new schools makes no sense for anything other than a single local elementary school which could be located at the old GDS site. DCPS needs to go back to the drawing board.
As for the gentlemen you mentioned, his assertion that the Foxhall neighborhood is racist was belied by the very large and diverse group of neighbors who spoke out against the flawed DCPS plan.
- Ward 3 parent of two DCPS students who lives nowhere near Foxhall but believes opponents of the Foxhall site made some very thoughtful arguments
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCPS' listening session tonight is a shocking display of NIMBY-ism on the part of the Foxhall community.
I was sick to my stomach.
Summary: “I value diversity BUT I value my ability to picnic outside more”
Bravo to the Hispanic/Jewish gentlemen that spoke up.
Anonymous wrote:It was clear that most of the speakers don't know anyone who attends public school. And believe that a school will take up the entire site.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCPS' listening session tonight is a shocking display of NIMBY-ism on the part of the Foxhall community.
I was sick to my stomach.
Summary: “I value diversity BUT I value my ability to picnic outside more”
Bravo to the Hispanic/Jewish gentlemen that spoke up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/29/dc-residents-angry-over-plan-raze-hardy-park-build/
Headline: "D.C. residents angry over plan to raze Hardy Park, build school"
Lede: "Anger, confusion and recrimination have erupted in one of the District’s tonier neighborhoods over city plans to raze parts of a park that is being renovated in order to build a public elementary school."
Truth: Nobody is proposing razing anything.
If half-truths and misinformation have a home in DC, its at the Washington Times. So of course that's where their story ended up. Somehow the geniuses behind this campaign failed to realize that peddling your story to the Washington Times isn't going to help you curry favor with the DC government.
Anonymous wrote:DCPS' listening session tonight is a shocking display of NIMBY-ism on the part of the Foxhall community.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/29/dc-residents-angry-over-plan-raze-hardy-park-build/
Headline: "D.C. residents angry over plan to raze Hardy Park, build school"
Lede: "Anger, confusion and recrimination have erupted in one of the District’s tonier neighborhoods over city plans to raze parts of a park that is being renovated in order to build a public elementary school."
Truth: Nobody is proposing razing anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The GDS site does not seem large enough for a HS, but could see a MS on that campus. Would this replace Hardy Middle School or supplement it? If it were a HS, the enrollment would be between a quarter and a third of Wilson's population.
Curiously, the survey is running over 50% for a new high school on the site. I don't get the thinking behind this. Most sensible option is to make GDS the new Hardy MS and then put a new HS on Wisconsin. Or maybe put a new MS on GDS, keep Hardy on Wisconsin with new boundaries to relieve Deal, and then use this Lord & Taylor site the NIMBYs love so much for a new HS. Lord knows that both a new HS AND MS are needed WOTP to relieve overcrowding at Wilson and Deal.
Right now Hardy is 46% in-boundary. It could also hold a few hundred more kids if needed. If Deal crowding could be solved by sending kids to Hardy, it would have been solved already. Adding more middle school capacity in the southern half of the ward does nothing for Deal, but it creates a whole lot more middle school seats that have the right to attend Wilson. The only way to solve for Deal is going to be a new middle school somewhere within the current Deal boundaries, probably in the northern part of Ward 3.
A new high school that Hardy feeds helps crowding at Wilson, although it doesn't completely solve the problem. The only question I see is whether you put the new high school at MacArthur, or move Hardy to MacArthur and put the new HS at the current Hardy location on Wisconsin. I prefer the second just because MacArthur "feels" more like a middle school location and Wisconsin "feels" more like a HS location to me. But that's my subjective opinion.
PP, I get the "feel" but it also just makes more sense. HS kids can take the multiple bus lines on Wisconsin. Some may take the red/blue/orange lines to closest stop then change to bus. The GDS MacArthur campus can accommodate 575 students, perhaps more if DCPS can negotiate an increase in enrollment numbers for that site. That number is more than the current Hardy level and could siphon off of the Deal enrollment.
The Lord and Taylor site makes a LOT of sense for another high school, especially because it is metro-accessible. And maybe it can be built in a way that a MS can also fit on the land.
GL DC parents! DCPS, do this!
Anonymous wrote:DCPS should just completely junk these plans.
Unless children are in person in standard classroom settings the crowding problem may take care of itself as people opt to move to the suburbs, go to charters, or for those who can afford it, go private.
Why would you buy a building without a plan?
The neighborhood is transit inaccessible because it wants to be "exclusive." GDS realized that it was a poor property for this and other reasons. That is why they sold.
Just because something is available to purchase doesn't mean you should buy it. What incredibly poor planning.
Now there is a site that few want to send their children to -- the justification is some parents told them to buy. Who are these parents? What was the strategy?
DCPS can be so frustrating and disappointing all at once.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/29/dc-residents-angry-over-plan-raze-hardy-park-build/