Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pelosi should have taken the $1.8T deal. It WAS over half of what the Dems initially wanted ($3T). In what world of negotiations is getting over half of what you wanted a 'bad deal'? The $1.8T package included $1200 checks, money for states, and unemployment relief, but Pelosi nixed it. Pelosi thought she was being smart, because if it passed she calculated it might help Trump. Except now it has stupendously backfired just like her stupid charade into impeachment to no where. Now the govt is about to get shutdown and Pelosi is now talking about providing no relief all the way until January. She's an incompetent moron, who lives in multi-million dollar gated homes in her exclusive properties in SF and Nappa Valley while reaping millions of dollars from stocks like Visa and Crowdstrike. Meanwhile, Americans suffer because she wants to play politics with the relief bill that could have passed weeks ago with everything she wanted!

Same.

DP. So why can’t it pas now? Ohhhh wait. Mitch. There’s no reason the number had to get smaller other than absolute vindictiveness cruelty and apathy. She said no because of the corporate liability shield, so the number got smaller and smaller until she would be forced to accept it to get crumbs. It’s sick.

She knew what Mitch was from the get go. If he could go smaller he would. She should have accepted the $1.8T. Pelosi yelled and screeched 'it wasn't enough, we need to CRUSH the virus.' How's that crushing going for you? People are starving, its snowing in half the U.S. now with families facing evictions, and we're averaging 3,000+ deaths a day now.

Not really. No relief bill passed the Senate or received a floor vote. Mitch wasn't sure he could get his own caucus to agree on anything. It wasn't clear that even the 1.8T would pass the Senate.

Its Nancy's fault because Mitch is too evil to actually help citizens without trading for corporate interests? What kind of misogynist gaslighting is this??

Not everything is misogyny. I would say the same thing about a male House leader. KNOW WHEN TO FOLD YOUR CARDS. She had a winning hand for the American people most effected by this crisis and she held it back for a gamble. A gamble she lost. Now there's no solution pending. And she's been doing this since July. Always 'CRUSH THE VIRUS'. Never compromise.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pelosi should have taken the $1.8T deal. It WAS over half of what the Dems initially wanted ($3T). In what world of negotiations is getting over half of what you wanted a 'bad deal'? The $1.8T package included $1200 checks, money for states, and unemployment relief, but Pelosi nixed it. Pelosi thought she was being smart, because if it passed she calculated it might help Trump. Except now it has stupendously backfired just like her stupid charade into impeachment to no where. Now the govt is about to get shutdown and Pelosi is now talking about providing no relief all the way until January. She's an incompetent moron, who lives in multi-million dollar gated homes in her exclusive properties in SF and Nappa Valley while reaping millions of dollars from stocks like Visa and Crowdstrike. Meanwhile, Americans suffer because she wants to play politics with the relief bill that could have passed weeks ago with everything she wanted!

Same.

DP. So why can’t it pas now? Ohhhh wait. Mitch. There’s no reason the number had to get smaller other than absolute vindictiveness cruelty and apathy. She said no because of the corporate liability shield, so the number got smaller and smaller until she would be forced to accept it to get crumbs. It’s sick.

\



Hello clown. You don't get everything you want during a negotiation. That's why it is a negotiation. Pelosi and the Dems literally got everything they wanted in the $1.8T offer. So what if they have to give some in terms of liability shields. YOU DO NOT GET EVERYTHING YOU WANT. They should have just signed the damn thing and moved on. Who cares about a liability shield? It would have only been in place for a few months now that the vaccine is rolling out. As usual, Pelosi overplayed her hand and it backfired. Americans could have gotten relief a long time ago and the Dems would have basically gotten everything they're asking for.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pelosi should have taken the $1.8T deal. It WAS over half of what the Dems initially wanted ($3T). In what world of negotiations is getting over half of what you wanted a 'bad deal'? The $1.8T package included $1200 checks, money for states, and unemployment relief, but Pelosi nixed it. Pelosi thought she was being smart, because if it passed she calculated it might help Trump. Except now it has stupendously backfired just like her stupid charade into impeachment to no where. Now the govt is about to get shutdown and Pelosi is now talking about providing no relief all the way until January. She's an incompetent moron, who lives in multi-million dollar gated homes in her exclusive properties in SF and Nappa Valley while reaping millions of dollars from stocks like Visa and Crowdstrike. Meanwhile, Americans suffer because she wants to play politics with the relief bill that could have passed weeks ago with everything she wanted!

Same.

DP. So why can’t it pas now? Ohhhh wait. Mitch. There’s no reason the number had to get smaller other than absolute vindictiveness cruelty and apathy. She said no because of the corporate liability shield, so the number got smaller and smaller until she would be forced to accept it to get crumbs. It’s sick.

She knew what Mitch was from the get go. If he could go smaller he would. She should have accepted the $1.8T. Pelosi yelled and screeched 'it wasn't enough, we need to CRUSH the virus.' How's that crushing going for you? People are starving, its snowing in half the U.S. now with families facing evictions, and we're averaging 3,000+ deaths a day now.

Its Nancy's fault because Mitch is too evil to actually help citizens without trading for corporate interests? What kind of misogynist gaslighting is this??

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know where the $1,200 figure comes from? That is such a low number. How does it get people beyond one month?

Its calculated based on an average nationwide minimum wage of $7.25/hr and a 40-hour workweek. One single adult would make $1,200/month based on that total. I don't think it was ever supposed to be more than a top-off for individuals to buy lockdown supplies at the beginning of the crisis.

Thank you for answering.

Citizens should be ashamed to have elected this group of people to Congess. This is really heartbreaking.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pelosi should have taken the $1.8T deal. It WAS over half of what the Dems initially wanted ($3T). In what world of negotiations is getting over half of what you wanted a 'bad deal'? The $1.8T package included $1200 checks, money for states, and unemployment relief, but Pelosi nixed it. Pelosi thought she was being smart, because if it passed she calculated it might help Trump. Except now it has stupendously backfired just like her stupid charade into impeachment to no where. Now the govt is about to get shutdown and Pelosi is now talking about providing no relief all the way until January. She's an incompetent moron, who lives in multi-million dollar gated homes in her exclusive properties in SF and Nappa Valley while reaping millions of dollars from stocks like Visa and Crowdstrike. Meanwhile, Americans suffer because she wants to play politics with the relief bill that could have passed weeks ago with everything she wanted!

Same.

DP. So why can’t it pas now? Ohhhh wait. Mitch. There’s no reason the number had to get smaller other than absolute vindictiveness cruelty and apathy. She said no because of the corporate liability shield, so the number got smaller and smaller until she would be forced to accept it to get crumbs. It’s sick.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pelosi should have taken the $1.8T deal. It WAS over half of what the Dems initially wanted ($3T). In what world of negotiations is getting over half of what you wanted a 'bad deal'? The $1.8T package included $1200 checks, money for states, and unemployment relief, but Pelosi nixed it. Pelosi thought she was being smart, because if it passed she calculated it might help Trump. Except now it has stupendously backfired just like her stupid charade into impeachment to no where. Now the govt is about to get shutdown and Pelosi is now talking about providing no relief all the way until January. She's an incompetent moron, who lives in multi-million dollar gated homes in her exclusive properties in SF and Nappa Valley while reaping millions of dollars from stocks like Visa and Crowdstrike. Meanwhile, Americans suffer because she wants to play politics with the relief bill that could have passed weeks ago with everything she wanted!

Same.

DP. So why can’t it pas now? Ohhhh wait. Mitch. There’s no reason the number had to get smaller other than absolute vindictiveness cruelty and apathy. She said no because of the corporate liability shield, so the number got smaller and smaller until she would be forced to accept it to get crumbs. It’s sick.

She knew what Mitch was from the get go. If he could go smaller he would. She should have accepted the $1.8T. Pelosi yelled and screeched 'it wasn't enough, we need to CRUSH the virus.' How's that crushing going for you? People are starving, its snowing in half the U.S. now with families facing evictions, and we're averaging 3,000+ deaths a day now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know where the $1,200 figure comes from? That is such a low number. How does it get people beyond one month?

Its calculated based on an average nationwide minimum wage of $7.25/hr and a 40-hour workweek. One single adult would make $1,200/month based on that total. I don't think it was ever supposed to be more than a top-off for individuals to buy lockdown supplies at the beginning of the crisis.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pelosi should have taken the $1.8T deal. It WAS over half of what the Dems initially wanted ($3T). In what world of negotiations is getting over half of what you wanted a 'bad deal'? The $1.8T package included $1200 checks, money for states, and unemployment relief, but Pelosi nixed it. Pelosi thought she was being smart, because if it passed she calculated it might help Trump. Except now it has stupendously backfired just like her stupid charade into impeachment to no where. Now the govt is about to get shutdown and Pelosi is now talking about providing no relief all the way until January. She's an incompetent moron, who lives in multi-million dollar gated homes in her exclusive properties in SF and Nappa Valley while reaping millions of dollars from stocks like Visa and Crowdstrike. Meanwhile, Americans suffer because she wants to play politics with the relief bill that could have passed weeks ago with everything she wanted!

Same.

DP. So why can’t it pas now? Ohhhh wait. Mitch. There’s no reason the number had to get smaller other than absolute vindictiveness cruelty and apathy. She said no because of the corporate liability shield, so the number got smaller and smaller until she would be forced to accept it to get crumbs. It’s sick.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pelosi should have taken the $1.8T deal. It WAS over half of what the Dems initially wanted ($3T). In what world of negotiations is getting over half of what you wanted a 'bad deal'? The $1.8T package included $1200 checks, money for states, and unemployment relief, but Pelosi nixed it. Pelosi thought she was being smart, because if it passed she calculated it might help Trump. Except now it has stupendously backfired just like her stupid charade into impeachment to no where. Now the govt is about to get shutdown and Pelosi is now talking about providing no relief all the way until January. She's an incompetent moron, who lives in multi-million dollar gated homes in her exclusive properties in SF and Nappa Valley while reaping millions of dollars from stocks like Visa and Crowdstrike. Meanwhile, Americans suffer because she wants to play politics with the relief bill that could have passed weeks ago with everything she wanted!

Same.

Anonymous wrote:Pelosi should have taken the $1.8T deal. It WAS over half of what the Dems initially wanted ($3T). In what world of negotiations is getting over half of what you wanted a 'bad deal'? The $1.8T package included $1200 checks, money for states, and unemployment relief, but Pelosi nixed it. Pelosi thought she was being smart, because if it passed she calculated it might help Trump. Except now it has stupendously backfired just like her stupid charade into impeachment to no where. Now the govt is about to get shutdown and Pelosi is now talking about providing no relief all the way until January. She's an incompetent moron, who lives in multi-million dollar gated homes in her exclusive properties in SF and Nappa Valley while reaping millions of dollars from stocks like Visa and Crowdstrike. Meanwhile, Americans suffer because she wants to play politics with the relief bill that could have passed weeks ago with everything she wanted!

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know where the $1,200 figure comes from? That is such a low number. How does it get people beyond one month?