Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The point you guys are missing is that you can't force teachers to go back. You can't force them to put their lives on the line for you or your kids. What's your plan? Fire all the teachers that won't go back? Are you going to go in and be a long-term sub?

Everyone saying that schools should be prioritized ahead restaurants, movies, etc., clearly don't need those fields to make money. Open restaurants impacts the restaurant, suppliers, shipping, and employees.

DL is tough! I WFH full-time and have two kids learning via DL. I would love for my kids to go in-person, but not if they are going to be crowded in a classroom because teachers aren't showing up or parents send their kids in who have/had a fever and/or cough.

I think you missed the evolution this thread. The hypothesis put forth now is if they opened the schools first - before restaurants, bars, salons, etc - we wouldn’t be in this mess. After essential services should have come education/schools.

That was never an option because of the anti maskers and covid deniers who had fits about bars and hair salons being closed. And they got their cues from the white house.

You mean those parents who were trying to put food on the table by working? Come on - the uproar wasn't about getting beer and a haircut. People are trying to earn a living to pay the rent and for groceries. These are their livelihoods. The lack of sympathy for what family breadwinners were going through during the height of lockdowns is really elitist.

Regardless, those calls about what to open what and when and under what regulations, were made by local elected officials like governors, not "covid deniers".

Most lower income families are making it work. Those that are generally complaining are living in $800K plus houses, nicer cars, travel and didn't plan child care into their budget. Those struggling are able to get child care vouchers. Its the over spenders that have the issue. We are fine with it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The point you guys are missing is that you can't force teachers to go back. You can't force them to put their lives on the line for you or your kids. What's your plan? Fire all the teachers that won't go back? Are you going to go in and be a long-term sub?

Everyone saying that schools should be prioritized ahead restaurants, movies, etc., clearly don't need those fields to make money. Open restaurants impacts the restaurant, suppliers, shipping, and employees.

DL is tough! I WFH full-time and have two kids learning via DL. I would love for my kids to go in-person, but not if they are going to be crowded in a classroom because teachers aren't showing up or parents send their kids in who have/had a fever and/or cough.

I think you missed the evolution this thread. The hypothesis put forth now is if they opened the schools first - before restaurants, bars, salons, etc - we wouldn’t be in this mess. After essential services should have come education/schools.

That was never an option because of the anti maskers and covid deniers who had fits about bars and hair salons being closed. And they got their cues from the white house.

You mean those parents who were trying to put food on the table by working? Come on - the uproar wasn't about getting beer and a haircut. People are trying to earn a living to pay the rent and for groceries. These are their livelihoods. The lack of sympathy for what family breadwinners were going through during the height of lockdowns is really elitist.

Regardless, those calls about what to open what and when and under what regulations, were made by local elected officials like governors, not "covid deniers".

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s completely insane to me that public school parents are still tolerating this. It’s like that old saying: when people tell you who you are, believe them. The failure of leadership told you everything you needed to know.

+1000.

Your kids will pay the price for this for years to come.

Anonymous wrote:Y’all this is super depressing as a parent of two SN kiddos who need more than an average child for support but are not severely disabled....

but the ACIP or whatever the acronym is came out with a framework for the vaccine phases. Meaning who gets the first, second, etc.

Kids and teachers are in phase 3. AND important to note, kids will only get the vaccine after a clinical trial deems it safe and effective for children. I don’t think there are any clinical trials on children going right now.

https://www.nationalacademies.org/news/2020/10/national-academies-release-framework-for-equitable-allocation-of-a-covid-19-vaccine-for-adoption-by-hhs-state-tribal-local-and-territorial-authorities

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The point you guys are missing is that you can't force teachers to go back. You can't force them to put their lives on the line for you or your kids. What's your plan? Fire all the teachers that won't go back? Are you going to go in and be a long-term sub?

Everyone saying that schools should be prioritized ahead restaurants, movies, etc., clearly don't need those fields to make money. Open restaurants impacts the restaurant, suppliers, shipping, and employees.

DL is tough! I WFH full-time and have two kids learning via DL. I would love for my kids to go in-person, but not if they are going to be crowded in a classroom because teachers aren't showing up or parents send their kids in who have/had a fever and/or cough.

I think you missed the evolution this thread. The hypothesis put forth now is if they opened the schools first - before restaurants, bars, salons, etc - we wouldn’t be in this mess. After essential services should have come education/schools.

That was never an option because of the anti maskers and covid deniers who had fits about bars and hair salons being closed. And they got their cues from the white house.

You mean those parents who were trying to put food on the table by working? Come on - the uproar wasn't about getting beer and a haircut. People are trying to earn a living to pay the rent and for groceries. These are their livelihoods. The lack of sympathy for what family breadwinners were going through during the height of lockdowns is really elitist.

Regardless, those calls about what to open what and when and under what regulations, were made by local elected officials like governors, not "covid deniers".

Yeah. It's pretty rich to see the endless shouting and hand wringing about bars / gyms etc opening before little Larla went back to kindy from people who are able to work remotely. Try really hard to think past the initial fixation on people getting their nails done/going out for a drink.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The point you guys are missing is that you can't force teachers to go back. You can't force them to put their lives on the line for you or your kids. What's your plan? Fire all the teachers that won't go back? Are you going to go in and be a long-term sub?

Everyone saying that schools should be prioritized ahead restaurants, movies, etc., clearly don't need those fields to make money. Open restaurants impacts the restaurant, suppliers, shipping, and employees.

DL is tough! I WFH full-time and have two kids learning via DL. I would love for my kids to go in-person, but not if they are going to be crowded in a classroom because teachers aren't showing up or parents send their kids in who have/had a fever and/or cough.

I think you missed the evolution this thread. The hypothesis put forth now is if they opened the schools first - before restaurants, bars, salons, etc - we wouldn’t be in this mess. After essential services should have come education/schools.

That was never an option because of the anti maskers and covid deniers who had fits about bars and hair salons being closed. And they got their cues from the white house.

You mean those parents who were trying to put food on the table by working? Come on - the uproar wasn't about getting beer and a haircut. People are trying to earn a living to pay the rent and for groceries. These are their livelihoods. The lack of sympathy for what family breadwinners were going through during the height of lockdowns is really elitist.

Regardless, those calls about what to open what and when and under what regulations, were made by local elected officials like governors, not "covid deniers".

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well we can see other areas of the country with schools open so it’s not all about the federal government.

And now back to the war on science in the US. The spread of the virus is not uniform over the US. It wasn't uniform in China or other countries either. That isn't how viruses work.

Anonymous wrote:Schools should have been the first to reopen and not the last. We never had leadership in this and definitely need a change in government. Just forcing schools to open now is wrong.

I’m all for the do-over concept! Complete shutdown, testing and then reopen the schools first. Mandatory masks and social distancing nationwide.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We live in Orange County, California. Our private school opened on time and the public schools opened last week. DS’s school has mask and distancing requirements but goes full time as the classes were already small.

But here’s what I think seems to be different in thinking from what I read here: the only thing the kids here do is school. Other than that we are still all very much in shutdown mode. No play dates, no bike riding with friends, no restaurants, no parties, no pods - nothing but school. Reopening was contingent on low numbers in the community only. And they will shutdown again if the numbers go up.

I think this is the only way to go. We have to prioritize school and let go of everything else for awhile.

I really wish we could do that. We can go to the movies, casino, and bars but my K kid can’t learn to read. It’s shameful.

I also agree with this. People are allowing their kids to engage in higher risk behavior to make up for the lack of in person school. Riskier behavior leads to more cases which, in turn, makes it more likely that schools will not reopen in person.

If we could flip that, and prioritize in person school over other higher risk behaviors, we might get kids in school and see lower case numbers. However, I don't see that happening.

Another in full agreement. This is where our government should have set out a PLAN to place education first.